Imipenem/cilastatin encapsulated polymeric nanoparticles for destroying carbapenem-resistant bacterial isolates
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistance is an extremely growing medical threat in antibacterial therapy as the incurable resistant strains easily develop a multi-resistance action to other potent antimicrobial agents. Nonetheless, the protective delivery of current antibiotics using nano-carriers opens a tremendous approach in the antimicrobial therapy, allowing the nano-formulated antibiotics to beat these health threat pathogens. Herein, we encapsulated imipenem into biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles to destroy the imipenem-resistant bacteria and overcome the microbial adhesion and dissemination. Imipenem loaded poly Ɛ-caprolactone (PCL) and polylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) nanocapsules were formulated using double emulsion evaporation method. The obtained nanocapsules were characterized for mean particle diameter, morphology, loading efficiency, and in vitro release. The in vitro antimicrobial and anti adhesion activities were evaluated against selected imipenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. RESULTS: The obtained results reveal that imipenem loaded PCL nano-formulation enhances the microbial susceptibility and antimicrobial activity of imipenem. The imipenem loaded PCL nanoparticles caused faster microbial killing within 2-3 h compared to the imipenem loaded PLGA and free drug. Successfully, PCL nanocapsules were able to protect imipenem from enzymatic degradation by resistant isolates and prevent the emergence of the resistant colonies, as it lowered the mutation prevention concentration of free imipenem by twofolds. Moreover, the imipenem loaded PCL eliminated bacterial attachment and the biofilm assembly of P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae planktonic bacteria by 74 and 78.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These promising results indicate that polymeric nanoparticles recover the efficacy of imipenem and can be considered as a new paradigm shift against multidrug-resistant isolates in treating severe bacterial infections.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Drug-loaded poly(caprolactone) nanoparticles conferred 250- and 62.5-fold decreases in minimal inhibitory concentrations compared with free imipenem in in vitro cultures of imipenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa, respectively.
“Shaaban et al. developed poly(caprolactone) nanoparticles loaded with imipenem 82 and found that drug-loaded nanoparticles conferred 250- and 62.5-fold decreases in minimal inhibitory concentrations compared with free imipenem in in vitro cultures of imipenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa , respectively.”
From Nanotechnology approaches for global infectious diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [82]
Free imipenem had negligible effect when co-administered with carbapenemase, while the nanoparticles had comparable bactericidal effects regardless of whether carbapenemase had been co-administered.
“The results demonstrated that while free imipenem had negligible effect when co-administered with the enzyme, the nanoparticles had comparable bactericidal effects regardless of whether carbapenemase had been co-administered.”
From Nanotechnology approaches for global infectious diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [82]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 58
- Authors
- Shaaban, M. I., Shaker, M. A., & Mady, F. M.
- Affiliations
- Mansoura University (EG)
- Taibah University (SA)
- Corresponding author
- Shaker, Mohamed A.
- Venue
- Journal of Nanobiotechnology
- Published
- 2017-04-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-29
- ISSN
- 1477-3155 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5387208
- OpenAlex
- W2605410606
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Nanobiotechnology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- Taibah University
- Mansoura University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
- Keywords
- imipenem, carbapenem resistance, polymeric nanoparticles, polycaprolactone, PLGA, nanocapsules, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, biofilm inhibition, bacterial adhesion, multidrug resistance, antibiotic delivery, cilastatin
- MeSH terms
- Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer, Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacterial Adhesion, Bacterial Infections, Drug Carriers, Drug Combinations, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Particle Size, Polyesters, Polyglycolic Acid, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Cilastatin, Imipenem, beta-Lactam Resistance, Biofilms, Lactic Acid, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review