Cited by 82Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSmoking Behavior and CessationImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Young people’s awareness of the timing and placement of gambling advertising on traditional and social media platforms: a study of 11–16-year-olds in Australia

Open access
Thomas, Samantha L., Bestman, Amy, Pitt, Hannah, Cassidy, Rebecca, McCarthy, Simone, Nyemcsok, Christian, Cowlishaw, Sean, Daube, Mike·2018·Harm Reduction Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research has demonstrated that the promotion of gambling, particularly within sport, may have a significant impact on positively shaping young people's attitudes towards gambling. While some governments have implemented restrictions to limit young people's exposure to gambling advertising, few studies have investigated where young people recall seeing gambling advertising, and whether they perceive that advertising restrictions have gone far enough in reducing exposure to these promotions. METHOD: Mixed methods, interviewer-assisted surveys were conducted with n = 111 young people aged 11-16 years, who were self-reported fans of basketball in Victoria, Australia. Interviews were conducted at basketball stadiums between May and July 2018. The study assessed media viewing patterns; recall and awareness of the timing, placement, and content of gambling advertising; the impact of gambling advertising restrictions; and attitudes towards sporting organisations' roles in the promotion of gambling. RESULTS: The majority of young people recalled seeing gambling advertising on television (n = 101, 91.0%), with most recalling advertising within sporting matches or games (n = 79, 71.2%). Most young people recalled seeing gambling advertising in the early evening before 8:30 pm (n = 75, 67.6%). Just over half of young people described seeing gambling advertisements on social media (n = 61, 55.0%), and over a third (n = 40, 36.0%) recalled gambling advertising on YouTube, predominantly before watching sporting or gaming videos. The majority stated that they continued to watch sport after 8:30 pm (n = 93, 83.7%), which is when restrictions on advertising in live sport in Australia end. The majority (n = 88, 79.3%) stated that there were too many gambling advertisements in sport. Three quarters believed that sporting codes should do more to prevent young people from being exposed to advertising for gambling in sport (n = 84, 75.7%). CONCLUSIONS: There is now a clear body evidence that current regulatory systems for gambling advertising are ineffective, with further restrictions urgently needed across a range of media channels to prevent exposure to promotions that may encourage young people's interest and involvement in gambling.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12954-018-0254-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advertisements and marketing promoting commodities harmful to health such as ultra-processed foods, tobacco, alcohol, and gambling are omnipresent and enhanced via home delivery platforms.

    “Advertisements and marketing promoting commodities harmful to health such as ultra-processed foods, tobacco, alcohol, and gambling are omnipresent 3 -7 and enhanced via home delivery platforms (e.g., Just Eat and Deliveroo).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. [1]Messerlian C Derevensky JL Youth gambling: A public health perspective Journal of Gambling Issues 2005 20 1 69 79 15681591
  2. [3]Pitt H Thomas SL Bestman A Daube M Derevensky J What do children observe and learn from televised sports betting advertisements? A qualitative study among Australian children Aust N Z J Public Health 2017 41 6 604 610 10.1111/1753-6405.12728 29044821 · DOI
  3. [4]Delfabbro P King D Griffiths MD From adolescent to adult gambling: an analysis of longitudinal gambling patterns in South Australia Journal Of Gambling Studies / Co-Sponsored By The National Council On Problem Gambling And Institute For The Study Of Gambling And Commercial Gaming 2014 30 3 547 563 23595217
  4. [6]Volberg RA Gupta R Griffiths MD Olason DT Delfabbro P An international perspective on youth gambling prevalence studies International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health 2010 22 1 3 20491416
  5. [7]Derevensky J Shek D Joav M Youth Gambling: The Hidden Addiction 2011 Germany Walter De Gruyter Inc
  6. [10]Castrén S Grainger M Lahti T Alho H Salonen AH At-risk and problem gambling among adolescents: a convenience sample of first-year junior high school students in Finland Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy 2015 10 1 1 10.1186/1747-597X-10-1 PMC4381398 25879923 · DOI
  7. [11]Fröberg F Rosendahl IK Abbott M Romild U Tengström A Hallqvist J The incidence of problem gambling in a representative cohort of Swedish female and male 16–24 year-olds by socio-demographic characteristics, in comparison with 25–44 year-olds J Gambl Stud 2015 31 3 621 641 10.1007/s10899-014-9450-9 24590609 · DOI
  8. [14]Messerlian C Byrne AM Derevensky JL Gambling, youth and the Internet: Should we be concerned The Canadian Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Review 2004 13 1 3 6 19030146 PMC2533814
  9. [15]Gupta R Derevensky JL Ellenbogen S Personality characteristics and risk-taking tendencies among adolescent gamblers Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement 2006 38 3 201 10.1037/cjbs2006008 · DOI
  10. [16]Hardoon KK Derevensky JL Social influences involved in children's gambling behavior J Gambl Stud 2001 17 3 191 215 10.1023/A:1012216305671 11761604 · DOI
  11. [17]Reith G Dobbie F Beginning gambling: The role of social networks and environment Addict Res Theory 2011 19 6 483 493 10.3109/16066359.2011.558955 · DOI
  12. [18]Pitt H Thomas SL Bestman A Daube M Derevensky J Factors that influence children’s gambling attitudes and consumption intentions: Lessons for gambling harm prevention research, policies and advocacy strategies Harm Reduction Journal. 2017 14 11 1 12 28212685 PMC5316223
  13. [19]Blinn-Pike L Worthy SL Jonkman JN Adolescent gambling: a review of an emerging field of research J Adolesc Health 2010 47 3 223 236 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.05.003 20708560 · DOI
  14. [23]Pitt H Thomas SL Bestman A Stoneham M Daube M “It's just everywhere!” Children and parents discuss the marketing of sports wagering in Australia Aust N Z J Public Health 2016 40 5 480 486 10.1111/1753-6405.12564 27524502 · DOI
  15. [25]Pitt H Thomas SL Bestman A Initiation, influence, and impact: adolescents and parents discuss the marketing of gambling products during Australian sporting matches BMC Public Health 2016 16 1 967 10.1186/s12889-016-3610-z 27620167 PMC5020565 · DOI
  16. [26]Hing N Vitartas P Lamont M Fink E Adolescent exposure to gambling promotions during televised sport: An exploratory study of links with gambling intentions Int Gambl Stud 2014 14 3 374 393 10.1080/14459795.2014.902489 · DOI
  17. [27]Derevensky J Sklar A Gupta R Messerlian C An empirical study examining the impact of gambling advertisements on adolescent gambling attitudes and behaviors Int J Ment Heal Addict 2010 8 1 21 34 10.1007/s11469-009-9211-7 · DOI
  18. [29]McCarthy S Thomas S Randle M Bestman A Pitt H Cowlishaw S Daube M Women's gambling behaviour, product preferences, and perceptions of product harm: Differences by age and gambling risk status Harm Reduction Journal 2018 15 22 1 12 29690876 PMC5916584
  19. [30]Houghton S Hunter SC Rosenberg M Wood L Zadow C Martin K Shilton T Virtually impossible: limiting Australian children and adolescents daily screen based media use BMC Public Health 2015 15 1 5 10.1186/1471-2458-15-5 25613954 PMC4324783 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [32]Lobstein T Landon J Thornton N Jernigan D The commercial use of digital media to market alcohol products: a narrative review Addiction 2017 112 21 27 10.1111/add.13493 27327239 · DOI
  21. [33]Freeman B New media and tobacco control Tob Control 2012 21 2 139 144 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050193 22345236 · DOI
  22. [47]Bestman A Thomas SL Randle M Thomas SD Children’s implicit recall of junk food, alcohol and gambling sponsorship in Australian sport BMC Public Health 2015 15 1 1022 10.1186/s12889-015-2348-3 26438080 PMC4595000 · DOI
  23. [48]Oates C Blades M Gunter B Children and television advertising: When do they understand persuasive intent? J Consum Behav 2002 1 3 238 245 10.1002/cb.69 · DOI
  24. [49]Calvert SL Children as consumers: Advertising and marketing Futur Child 2008 18 1 205 234 10.1353/foc.0.0001 21338011 · DOI
  25. [56]Tobacco Free Kids. New Investigation Exposes How Tobacco Companies Market Cigarettes on Social Media in the U.S. and Around the World. 2018 [cited 03.09.18]. Available from: https://www.tobaccofreekids.org/press-releases/2018_08_27_ftc.
  26. [60]Stensholt J. Sportsbet takes AFL TV deal from Crownbet. Financial Review. 2017 18th January [cited 24.04.17]. Available from: http://www.afr.com/business/gambling/sportsbet-takes-afl-tv-deal-from-crownbet-20170118-gttl7o.
  27. [62]Petticrew M, Katikireddi SV, Knai C, Cassidy R, Hessari NM, Thomas J, Weishaar H. ‘Nothing can be done until everything is done’: the use of complexity arguments by food, beverage, alcohol and gambling industries. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017:jech-2017-209710. PMC5847098 28978619

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, S. L., Bestman, A., Pitt, H., Cassidy, R., McCarthy, S., Nyemcsok, C., Cowlishaw, S., & Daube, M.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • University of London (GB)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Thomas, Samantha L.
Venue
Harm Reduction Journal
Published
2018-10-19
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
51-51
ISSN
1477-7517 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2895924655
Cited by
82
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Harm Reduction Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Goldsmiths (University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
gambling advertising, youth gambling, advertising restrictions, social media advertising, television advertising, advertising recall, basketball fans, gambling regulation, youth
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Advertising, Attitude to Health, Awareness, Child, Female, Gambling, Humans, Male, Mental Recall, Socioeconomic Factors, Sports, Television, Time Factors, Victoria, Harm Reduction, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review