Partners matter: The psychosocial well-being of couples when dealing with endometriosis
Open accessAbstract
Background: Endometriosis is often associated with severe dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain and dyspareunia and has a high impact on daily life as well as sexuality. Quality of partnership positively influences the course of various diseases and ability to cope with emotional and physical distress. However, studies focusing on the male partners of endometriosis patients are rare, and even less is known about the reciprocal relationship in these couples. Therefore, this study aims to explore the interrelations in couples with endometriosis in matters of psychological distress, sexual and partnership satisfaction and social support. Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted in two university-affiliated fertility centres in Germany and Austria with n = 104 female/male couples affected by endometriosis. Participants completed a questionnaire regarding endometriosis, partnership, sexuality, stress, anxiety, depression and social support. Both women and men were asked about the impact of women’s endometriosis-related pain (IEP) on their everyday life (e.g. leisure time). Data were analysed using the Actor-Partner-Interdependence Model. Results: Significant partner effects were evident: High depression, anxiety and stress scores in women were associated with a higher IEP in men (all p ≤ 0.01), reciprocally high stress and depression scores in men were correlated with a higher IEP in women (all p ≤ 0.05). Less sexual satisfaction in women was associated with a higher IEP in men ( p = 0.040). There was a significant reciprocal association between the perceived lack of understanding from the social environment and a higher IEP, for both women ( p = 0.022) and men ( p = 0.027). Conclusions: The male partner should be taken into account when counselling or treating women with endometriosis. Our study shows a high interdependence and reciprocal influence from both partners—positively and negatively—concerning psychological distress and sexual satisfaction. Furthermore, there ought to be more awareness for the psychosocial impact of endometriosis, especially in regard to social support and understanding. Talking about and improving sexual satisfaction as well as enhancing stress reducing techniques may hold great benefits for dealing with endometriosis. Registration number The study is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), number DRKS00014362.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A study conducted in Heidelberg and Innsbruck indicated that the subjective experience of major stress heightened the negative impact of endometriosis pain not only on the patients, but also on their partners.
“A study conducted in Heidelberg and Innsbruck indicated that the subjective experience of major stress heightened the negative impact of endometriosis pain not only on the patients, but also on their partners [33].”
From Endometriosis: patient–doctor communication and psychological counselling (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
Methods > Setting identifies Heidelberg and Innsbruck as the study sites. Results > Impact of endometriosis-related pain reports that higher stress scores in women were associated with a greater reported impact of pain on both women and their partners. The cross-sectional study does not establish that stress heightened that impact, and it measured stress scores rather than a distinct experience of “major stress.” No page numbers are supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSocial support had a great deal less influence than the subjectively perceived absence of understanding for the illness from others; the mutual heightening of endometriosis pain was even more marked than in the subjective experience of stress.
“Interestingly, social support had a great deal less influence than the (subjectively perceived) absence of understanding for the illness from others. Here the (mutual) heightening of endometriosis pain was even more marked than in the subjective experience of stress.”
From Endometriosis: patient–doctor communication and psychological counselling (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 27
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [3]Deutsches IVF-Register (DIR). Jahrbuch 2016. In: Journal für reproduktionsmedizin und endokrinologie (Nachdruck). 2017; 14:1–56.
- [23]Brown KS. Dyspareunia due to endometriosis: A qualitative study of its effect on the couple relationship (Dissertation). In: ProQuest Information & Learning, 2007.
- Authors
- Schick, M., Germeyer, A., Böttcher, B., Hecht, S., Geiser, M., Rösner, S., Eckstein, M., Vomstein, K., Toth, B., Strowitzki, T., Wischmann, T., & Ditzen, B.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Schick, Maren
- ORCID
- Venue
- Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Published
- 2022-05-28
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-86
- ISSN
- 1477-7525 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9148469
- OpenAlex
- W4281734287
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 3.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2022-07-28)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health and Quality of Life Outcomes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Keywords
- endometriosis, couples, male partners, psychosocial well-being, psychological distress, depression, anxiety, stress, sexual satisfaction, partnership satisfaction, social support, reciprocal effects, actor-partner interdependence, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, pelvic pain
- MeSH terms
- Cross-Sectional Studies, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Sexual Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review