Cited by 1Protein Structure and DynamicsHeat shock proteins researchBiochemical and Structural Characterization

Design of stable circular permutants of the GroEL chaperone apical domain

Open access
Melnik, Tatiana N., Majorina, Maria A., Vorobeva, Daria E., Nagibina, Galina S., Veselova, Victoria R., Glukhova, Ksenia A., Pak, Marina A., Ivankov, Dmitry N. +2 more·2024·Cell Communication and Signaling

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Enhancing protein stability holds paramount significance in biotechnology, therapeutics, and the food industry. Circular permutations offer a distinctive avenue for manipulating protein stability while keeping intra-protein interactions intact. Amidst the creation of circular permutants, determining the optimal placement of the new N- and C-termini stands as a pivotal, albeit largely unexplored, endeavor. In this study, we employed PONDR-FIT’s predictions of disorder propensity to guide the design of circular permutants for the GroEL apical domain (residues 191–345). Our underlying hypothesis posited that a higher predicted disorder value would correspond to reduced stability in the circular permutants, owing to the increased likelihood of fluctuations in the novel N- and C-termini. To substantiate this hypothesis, we engineered six circular permutants, positioning glycines within the loops as locations for the new N- and C-termini. We demonstrated the validity of our hypothesis along the set of the designed circular permutants, as supported by measurements of melting temperatures by circular dichroism and differential scanning microcalorimetry. Consequently, we propose a novel computational methodology that rationalizes the design of circular permutants with projected stability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12964-023-01426-4

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Melnik, T. N., Majorina, M. A., Vorobeva, D. E., Nagibina, G. S., Veselova, V. R., Glukhova, K. A., Pak, M. A., Ivankov, D. N., Uversky, V. N., & Melnik, B. S.
Affiliations
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU)
  • Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (RU)
Corresponding author
  • Uversky, Vladimir N.
  • Melnik, Bogdan S.
Venue
Cell Communication and Signaling
Published
2024-02-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
90-90
ISSN
1478-811X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391450021
Cited by
1
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Communication and Signaling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Russian Science Foundation (21-14-00268)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
Keywords
circular permutation, GroEL, protein stability, intrinsically disordered regions, melting point, protein engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review