Associations and prognostic significance of diffuse myocardial fibrosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Increased myocardial fibrosis may play a key role in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) pathophysiology. The study aim was to evaluate the presence, associations, and prognostic significance of diffuse fibrosis in HFpEF patients compared to age- and sex-matched controls. METHODS: We prospectively included 118 consecutive HFpEF patients. Diffuse myocardial fibrosis was estimated by extracellular volume (ECV) quantified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence. We determined an ECV age- and sex-adjusted cutoff value (33%) in 26 controls. RESULTS: Mean ECV was significantly higher in HFpEF patients versus healthy controls (32.9 ± 4.8% vs 28.2 ± 2.4%, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio (OR) =0.92 [0.86-0.98], P = 0.011), diabetes (OR = 2.62 [1.11-6.18], P = 0.028), and transmitral peak E wave velocity (OR = 1.02 [1.00-1.03], P = 0.022) were significantly associated with abnormal ECV value. During a median follow-up of 11 ± 6 months, the primary outcome (all-cause mortality or first heart failure hospitalization) occurred in 38 patients. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, diabetes (hazard ratio (HR) =1.98 [1.04; 3.76], P = 0.038) and hemoglobin level (HR = 0.81 [0.67; 0.98], P = 0.028) were significant predictors of composite outcome. The ECV ability to improve this model added significant prognostic information. We then developed a risk score including diabetes, hemoglobin and ECV > 33% demonstrating significant prediction of risk and validated this score in a validation cohort of 53 patients. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significant difference according to tertiles of the probability score (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Among HFpEF patients, high ECV, likely reflecting abnormal diffuse myocardial fibrosis, was associated with a higher rate of all-cause death and first HF hospitalization in short term follow up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Characterization of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03197350 . Date of registration: 20/06/2017. This trial was retrospectively registered.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CMR imaging revealed more prevalent fibrosis in HFpEF subjects than in control subjects, and the HFpEF group was associated with adverse outcomes.
“Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging revealed more prevalent fibrosis in HFpEF subjects than in control subjects, and the first group was associated with adverse outcomes [105,106].”
From Dysregulated epicardial adipose tissue as a risk factor and potential therapeutic target of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in diabetes (2022) · cites this paper as [106]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 109
- Authors
- Roy, C., Slimani, A., de Meester, C., Amzulescu, M., Pasquet, A., Vancraeynest, D., Beauloye, C., Vanoverschelde, J.-L., Gerber, B. L., & Pouleur, A.-C.
- Affiliations
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Roy, Clotilde
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55
- ISSN
- 1097-6647 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6081897
- OpenAlex
- W2887191819
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11
- FWCI
- 9.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
- AstraZeneca
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
- Keywords
- diffuse myocardial fibrosis, extracellular volume, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, prognostic risk score, diabetes mellitus, hemoglobin, body mass index, E-wave velocity, all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, risk stratification, risk prediction model validation
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cause of Death, Female, Fibrosis, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Myocardium, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Stroke Volume, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies, Ventricular Function, Left, Disease Progression, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine, Ventricular Remodeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review