Cited by 109Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies

Associations and prognostic significance of diffuse myocardial fibrosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Open access
Roy, Clotilde, Slimani, Alisson, de Meester, Christophe, Amzulescu, Mihaela, Pasquet, Agnes, Vancraeynest, David, Beauloye, Christophe, Vanoverschelde, Jean-Louis +2 more·2018·Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased myocardial fibrosis may play a key role in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) pathophysiology. The study aim was to evaluate the presence, associations, and prognostic significance of diffuse fibrosis in HFpEF patients compared to age- and sex-matched controls. METHODS: We prospectively included 118 consecutive HFpEF patients. Diffuse myocardial fibrosis was estimated by extracellular volume (ECV) quantified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence. We determined an ECV age- and sex-adjusted cutoff value (33%) in 26 controls. RESULTS: Mean ECV was significantly higher in HFpEF patients versus healthy controls (32.9 ± 4.8% vs 28.2 ± 2.4%, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio (OR) =0.92 [0.86-0.98], P = 0.011), diabetes (OR = 2.62 [1.11-6.18], P = 0.028), and transmitral peak E wave velocity (OR = 1.02 [1.00-1.03], P = 0.022) were significantly associated with abnormal ECV value. During a median follow-up of 11 ± 6 months, the primary outcome (all-cause mortality or first heart failure hospitalization) occurred in 38 patients. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, diabetes (hazard ratio (HR) =1.98 [1.04; 3.76], P = 0.038) and hemoglobin level (HR = 0.81 [0.67; 0.98], P = 0.028) were significant predictors of composite outcome. The ECV ability to improve this model added significant prognostic information. We then developed a risk score including diabetes, hemoglobin and ECV > 33% demonstrating significant prediction of risk and validated this score in a validation cohort of 53 patients. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significant difference according to tertiles of the probability score (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Among HFpEF patients, high ECV, likely reflecting abnormal diffuse myocardial fibrosis, was associated with a higher rate of all-cause death and first HF hospitalization in short term follow up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Characterization of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03197350 . Date of registration: 20/06/2017. This trial was retrospectively registered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12968-018-0477-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 109

Authors
Roy, C., Slimani, A., de Meester, C., Amzulescu, M., Pasquet, A., Vancraeynest, D., Beauloye, C., Vanoverschelde, J.-L., Gerber, B. L., & Pouleur, A.-C.
Affiliations
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE)
Corresponding author
Roy, Clotilde
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
55
ISSN
1097-6647 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2887191819
Cited by
109
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11
FWCI
9.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
  • AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Keywords
diffuse myocardial fibrosis, extracellular volume, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, prognostic risk score, diabetes mellitus, hemoglobin, body mass index, E-wave velocity, all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, risk stratification, risk prediction model validation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cause of Death, Female, Fibrosis, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Myocardium, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Stroke Volume, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies, Ventricular Function, Left, Disease Progression, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine, Ventricular Remodeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review