Cited by 35Cardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionAortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesConnective tissue disorders research

Impaired aortic distensibility and elevated central blood pressure in Turner syndrome: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

Open access
Wen, Jan, Trolle, Christian, Viuff, Mette H., Ringgaard, Steffen, Laugesen, Esben, Gutmark, Ephraim J., Subramaniam, Dhananjay Radhakrishnan, Backeljauw, Philippe +4 more·2018·Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with Turner Syndrome have an increased risk for aortic dissection. Arterial stiffening is a risk factor for aortic dilatation and dissection. Here we investigate if arterial stiffening can be observed in Turner Syndrome patients and is an initial step in the development of aortic dilatation and subsequent dissection. METHODS: Fifty-seven women with Turner Syndrome (48 years [29-66]) and thirty-six age- and sex-matched controls (49 years [26-68]) were included. Distensibility, blood pressure, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), the augmentation index (Aix) and central blood pressure were determined using cardiovascular magnetic resonance, a 24-h blood pressure measurement and applanation tonometry. Aortic distensibility was determined at three locations: ascending aorta, transverse aortic arch, and descending aorta. RESULTS: Mean aortic distensibility in the descending aorta was significantly lower in Turner Syndrome compared to healthy controls (P = 0.02), however, this was due to a much lower distensibility among Turner Syndrome with coarctation, while Turner Syndrome without coarctation had similar distensibility as controls. Both the mean heart rate adjusted Aix (31.4% vs. 24.4%; P = 0.02) and central diastolic blood pressure (78.8 mmHg vs. 73.7 mmHg; P = 0.02) were higher in Turner Syndrome compared to controls, and these indices correlated significantly with ambulatory night-time diastolic blood pressure. The presence of aortic coarctation (r = - 0.44, P = 0.005) and a higher central systolic blood pressure (r = - 0.34, P = 0.03), age and presence of diabetes were inversely correlated with aortic distensibility in TS. CONCLUSION: Aortic wall function in the descending aorta is impaired in Turner Syndrome with lower distensibility among those with coarctation of the aorta, and among all Turner Syndrome higher Aix, and elevated central diastolic blood pressure when compared to sex- and age-matched controls. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( #NCT01678274 ) on September 3, 2012.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12968-018-0497-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 35

Authors
Wen, J., Trolle, C., Viuff, M. H., Ringgaard, S., Laugesen, E., Gutmark, E. J., Subramaniam, D. R., Backeljauw, P., Gutmark-Little, I., Andersen, N. H., Mortensen, K. H., & Gravholt, C. H.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Gravholt, Claus H.
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
80
ISSN
1097-6647 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901989065
Cited by
35
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Lundbeckfonden
  • Augustinus Fonden
  • Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF13OC0003234, NNF15OC0016474)
  • The Toyota Foundation
  • the Aase og Einar Danielsen Foundation
  • “Fonden til lægevidenskabens fremme”
  • the Familien Hede Nielsen foundation
  • Aarhus Universitet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
Keywords
Turner syndrome, aortic distensibility, arterial stiffness, coarctation of the aorta, central blood pressure, augmentation index, pulse wave velocity, aortic dilatation, aortic dissection risk, descending aorta
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aortic Dissection, Aorta, Aortic Aneurysm, Dilatation, Pathologic, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Turner Syndrome, Case-Control Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine, Vascular Stiffness, Pulse Wave Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review