Epitope analysis following active immunization with tau proteins reveals immunogens implicated in tau pathogenesis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Abnormal tau hyperphosphorylation and its accumulation into intra-neuronal neurofibrillary tangles are linked to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease and similar tauopathies. One strategy to reduce accumulation is through immunization, but the most immunogenic tau epitopes have so far remained unknown. To fill this gap, we immunized mice with recombinant tau to build a map of the most immunogenic tau epitopes. METHODS: Non-transgenic and rTg4510 tau transgenic mice aged 5 months were immunized with either human wild-type tau (Wt, 4R0N) or P301L tau (4R0N). Each protein was formulated in Quil A adjuvant. Sera and splenocytes of vaccinated mice were collected to assess the humoral and cellular immune responses to tau. We employed a peptide array assay to identify the most effective epitopes. Brain histology was utilized to measure the effects of vaccination on tau pathology and inflammation. RESULTS: Humoral immune responses following immunization demonstrated robust antibody titers (up to 1:80,000 endpoint titers) to each tau species in both mice models. The number of IFN-γ producing T cells and their proliferation were also increased in splenocytes from immunized mice, indicating an increased cellular immune response, and tau levels and neuroinflammation were both reduced. We identified five immunogenic motifs within either the N-terminal (9-15 and 21-27 amino acids), proline rich (168-174 and 220-228 amino acids), or the C-terminal regions (427-438 amino acids) of the wild-type and P301L tau protein sequence. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies five previously unknown immunogenic motifs of wild-type and mutated (P301L) tau protein. Immunization with both proteins resulted in reduced tau pathology and neuroinflammation in a tau transgenic model, supporting the efficacy of tau immunotherapy in tauopathy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Similar tau immunogens administered with a milder adjuvant or fewer immunizations do not produce such adverse reactions.
“Similar tau immunogens administered with a milder adjuvant or fewer immunizations do not produce such adverse reactions194,196”
From Tau-targeting therapies for Alzheimer disease (2018) · cites this paper as [196]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 40
- Authors
- Selenica, M.-L. B., Davtyan, H., Housley, S. B., Blair, L. J., Gillies, A., Nordhues, B. A., Zhang, B., Liu, J., Gestwicki, J. E., Lee, D. C., Gordon, M. N., Morgan, D., & Dickey, C. A.
- Affiliations
- University of South Florida (US)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Selenica, Maj-Linda B
- Dickey, Chad A
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroinflammation
- Published
- 2014-09-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 152-152
- ISSN
- 1742-2094 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4167523
- OpenAlex
- W2152620843
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroinflammation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Alzheimer's Association (NIRG-13-281227)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008353, T32GM145304)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS073899, NS073899)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- tau protein, epitope mapping, active immunization, tau immunotherapy, tauopathy, Alzheimer's disease, P301L tau, tau hyperphosphorylation, neurofibrillary tangles, neuroinflammation, IFN-γ T cells, humoral immune response, rTg4510 mice, peptide arrays
- MeSH terms
- Adjuvants, Immunologic, Animals, Antibodies, Epitopes, Disease Models, Animal, Encephalitis, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Humans, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Saponins, T-Lymphocytes, Vaccination, Cytokines, tau Proteins, Epitope Mapping, Tauopathies, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Quillaja Saponins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review