Brain trauma elicits non-canonical macrophage activation states
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Macrophage polarization programs, commonly referred to as "classical" and "alternative" activation, are widely considered as distinct states that are exclusive of one another and are associated with different functions such as inflammation and wound healing, respectively. In a number of disease contexts, such as traumatic brain injury (TBI), macrophage polarization influences the extent of pathogenesis, and efforts are underway to eliminate pathogenic subsets. However, previous studies have not distinguished whether the simultaneous presence of both classical and alternative activation signatures represents the admixture of differentially polarized macrophages or if they have adopted a unique state characterized by components of both classical and alternative activation. METHODS: We analyzed the gene expression profiles of individual monocyte-derived brain macrophages responding to TBI using single-cell RNA sequencing. RNA flow cytometry was used as another single-cell analysis technique to validate the single-cell RNA sequencing results. RESULTS: The analysis of signature polarization genes by single-cell RNA sequencing revealed the presence of diverse activation states, including M(IL4), M(IL10), and M(LPS, IFNγ). However, the expression of a given polarization marker was no more likely than at random to predict simultaneous expression or repression of markers of another polarization program within the same cell, suggesting a lack of exclusivity in macrophage polarization states in vivo in TBI. Also unexpectedly, individual TBI macrophages simultaneously expressed high levels of signature polarization genes across two or three different polarization states and in several distinct and seemingly incompatible combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Single-cell gene expression profiling demonstrated that monocytic macrophages in TBI are not comprised of distinctly polarized subsets but are uniquely and broadly activated. TBI macrophage activation in vivo is deeply complex, with individual cells concurrently adopting both inflammatory and reparative features with a lack of exclusivity. These data provide physiologically relevant evidence that the early macrophage response to TBI is comprised of novel activation states that are discordant with the current paradigm of macrophage polarization-a key consideration for therapeutic modulation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reactive microglia in diseased brains demonstrate a mixed phenotype with expression of pro- or anti-inflammatory and homeostatic markers, particularly showing heterogeneity at the single-cell level, rather than completely reproducing the phenotype obtained from homogenous in vitro polarization studies.
“There is increasing evidence that reactive microglia in diseased brains demonstrate a mixed phenotype with expression of pro- or anti-inflammatory and homeostatic markers, particularly showing heterogeneity at the single-cell level, rather than completely reproducing the phenotype obtained from homogenous in vitro polarization studies (58,60,61,100–103).”
From <i>Trem2</i> promotes anti-inflammatory responses in microglia and is suppressed under pro-inflammatory conditions (2020) · cites this paper as [100]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 149
- Authors
- Kim, C. C., Nakamura, M. C., & Hsieh, C. L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hsieh, Christine L.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroinflammation
- Published
- 2016-05-24
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-117
- ISSN
- 1742-2094 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4879757
- OpenAlex
- W2407337075
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 9.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroinflammation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 BX002690, Career Development Award-2)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (AI027763)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK063720)
- National Institute of Health (AG046282)
- Rheumatology Research Foundation
- Russell/Engleman Rheumatology Research Center
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- traumatic brain injury, macrophage polarization, classical activation, alternative activation, monocyte-derived macrophages, single-cell gene expression, IL-4, IL-10, LPS, interferon-gamma, neuroinflammation
- MeSH terms
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Flow Cytometry, Lipopolysaccharides, Macrophage Activation, Macrophages, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Monocytes, Neuroglia, Neurons, RNA, Cytokines, Cell Polarity, Principal Component Analysis, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review