Awareness of female students attending higher educational institutions toward legalization of safe abortion and associated factors, Harari Region, Eastern Ethiopia: a cross sectional study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Unsafe abortion has been recognized as an important public health problem in the world. It accounts for 14% of all maternal deaths in sub-Saharan African countries. In Ethiopia, 32% of all maternal deaths are accounted to unsafe abortion. Taking the problem of unsafe abortion into consideration, the penal code of Ethiopia was amended in 2005, to permit safe abortion under a set of circumstances. However, lack of awareness on the revised penal code is a major barrier that hinders women to seek safe abortion. The aim of this study is to assess awareness of female students attending higher educational institutions toward legalization of safe abortion and associated factors in Harari region, eastern Ethiopia. METHODS: Institution-based descriptive cross sectional study was conducted among 762 female students who are attending five higher educational institutions in Harari Region. Systematic sampling method was used to identify study participants from randomly selected colleges. Self administered structured questionnaire was used to collect data. Data were entered in to Epi Info version 6.04 and analyzed by SPSS version 17.0 statistical packages. Frequency, percentage and ratio were used to describe variables. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to control confounders and odds ratio with 95% confidence interval was used to identify factors associated with awareness of female students to legalization of abortion. RESULTS: 762 study participants completed the survey questionnaire making the response rate 90.2%. Only 272 (35.7%) of the respondents reported that they have good awareness about legalization of safe abortion. Studying other fields than health and medicine [AOR 0.48; 95%CI (0.23, 0.85)], being the only child for their family [AOR 0.28; 95%CI (0.13, 0.86)], having no boy friend [AOR 0.34; 95%CI (0.12, 0.74)], using family planning [AOR 0.50; 95%CI (0.13 and 0.86)], being 25 years or older [AOR 1.64; 95%CI (1.33, 2.80)] were significantly associated with awareness of female students to legalization of safe abortion. CONCLUSIONS: Only slightly more than a third of the study participants, 35.7% have good awareness of legalization of safe abortion. Strengthening information dissemination regarding legalization of safe abortion is required for female reproductive age group in general and higher institution female students in particular.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The finding that the abortion law is not known is consistent with studies in Ethiopia and Nigeria where only a third of surveyed women were aware of the legal status of abortion.
“This is consistent with other studies in Ethiopia [27] and Nigeria [30] where only a third of the surveyed women were aware of the legal status of abortion.”
From Induced abortion: a cross-sectional study on knowledge of and attitudes toward the new abortion law in Maputo and Quelimane cities, Mozambique (2020) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Estimated Incidence of Induced Abortion in Ethiopia, 2008
Singh, S., Fetters, T., Gebreselassie, H., Abdella, A., Gebrehiwot, Y., Kumbi, S., & Audam, S. (2010) · International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/3601610 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- [2]From concept to measurement: operationalizing WHO’s definition of unsafe abortion. 2014. Bull World Health Organ 2014;92:155. www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/92/3/14-136333.pdf PMC3949603 24700971
- [3]Chelsea M Landon M Kemilembe T Knowledge of the abortion legislation among South African women: a cross-sectional study Reprod Health 2006 3 7 10.1186/1742-4755-3-7 16887015 PMC1555575 · DOI · Paper page
- [5]Hailemichael G Tamara F Susheela S Caring for Women with Abortion Complications in Ethiopia: National Estimates and Future Implications, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2010 36 1 6 15 10.1363/3600610 20403801 · DOI · Paper page
- [6]Berer M Making abortions safe: a matter of good public health policy and practice, Geneva Bull World Health Organ 2000 78 5 Print version ISSN 0042–9686 PMC2560758 10859852
- [10]Ojha N Sharma S Paudel J Post legalisation challenge: minimizing complications of abortion, Nepal Kathmandu Univ Med J 2003 2 2 131 6 15821380
- [12]Worku A Binyam B Awareness and Attitude to Liberalized Safe Abortion Services among Female Students in University and Colleges of Arba Minch Town, Ethiopia Sci J Public Health 2014 2 5 440 6 10.11648/j.sjph.20140205.20 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Frederico, M., Arnaldo, C., Decat, P., Juga, A., Kemigisha, E., Degomme, O., & Michielsen, K. (2020) · BMC Women's Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-020-00988-6 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Geleto, A., & Markos, J.
- Affiliations
- Haramaya University (ET)
- Corresponding author
- Geleto, Ayele
- Venue
- Reproductive Health
- Published
- 2015-03-17
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-19
- ISSN
- 1742-4755 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4383196
- OpenAlex
- W2109621110
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Reproductive Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Haramaya University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
- Keywords
- safe abortion, abortion legalization, awareness, female university students, maternal mortality, family planning, associated factors, reproductive health education, information dissemination, only child status, field of study, Eastern Ethiopia, Harari region, maternal health policy
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Spontaneous, Abortion, Induced, Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Ethiopia, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Students, Universities, Women's Rights, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review