Towards a consensus definition of maternal sepsis: results of a systematic review and expert consultation
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: There is a need for a clear and actionable definition of maternal sepsis, in order to better assess the burden of this condition, trigger timely and effective treatment and allow comparisons across facilities and countries. The objective of this study was to review maternal sepsis definitions and identification criteria and to report on the results of an expert consultation to develop a new international definition of maternal sepsis. METHODS: All original and review articles and WHO documents, as well as clinical guidelines providing definitions and/or identification criteria of maternal sepsis were included. A multidisciplinary international panel of experts was surveyed through an online consultation in March-April 2016 on their opinion on the existing sepsis definitions, including new definition of sepsis proposed for the adult population (2016 Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock) and importance of different criteria for identification of maternal sepsis. The definition was agreed using an iterative process in an expert face-to-face consensus development meeting convened by WHO and Jhpiego. RESULTS: Standardizing the definition of maternal sepsis and aligning it with the current understanding of sepsis in the adult population was considered a mandatory step to improve the assessment of the burden of maternal sepsis by the expert panel. The literature review and expert consultation resulted in a new WHO consensus definition "Maternal sepsis is a life-threatening condition defined as organ dysfunction resulting from infection during pregnancy, child-birth, post-abortion, or post-partum period". Plans are in progress to validate the new WHO definition of maternal sepsis in a large international population. CONCLUSION: The operationalization of the new maternal sepsis definition requires generation of a set of practical criteria to identify women with sepsis. These criteria should enable clinicians to focus on the timely initiation of actionable elements of care (administration of antimicrobials and fluids, support of vital organ functions, and referral) and improve maternal outcomes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are challenges in estimating maternal sepsis burden due to differences in its definitions.
“However, there are challenges in estimating maternal sepsis burden due to differences in its definitions [9, 10].”
From The aetiology and antimicrobial resistance of bacterial maternal infections in Sub-Saharan Africa—a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
on behalf of the Maternal Morbidity Working Group, Chou, D., Tunçalp, Ö., Firoz, T., Barreix, M., Filippi, V., von Dadelszen, P., van den Broek, N., Cecatti, J. G., & Say, L. (2016) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0789-4 · Cited by 156 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The new definition also aligns with the WHO definition of maternal morbidity defined as “any health condition attributed to and/or complicating pregnancy and childbirth that has a negative impact on the woman’s wellbeing and/or functioning” [53].”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- [1]Singer M Deutschman CS Seymour CW Shankar-Hari M Annane D Bauer M Bellomo R Bernard GR Chiche JD Coopersmith CM The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3) JAMA 2016 315 8 801 810 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 26903338 PMC4968574 · DOI · Paper page
- [2]Acosta CD Knight M Sepsis and maternal mortality Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2013 25 2 109 116 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32835e0e82 23385771 · DOI
- [3]Bauer ME Bauer ST Rajala B MacEachern MP Polley LS Childers D Aronoff DM Maternal physiologic parameters in relationship to systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis Obstet Gynecol 2014 124 3 535 541 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000423 25162253 · DOI
- [4]Buddeberg BS Aveling W Puerperal sepsis in the 21st century: progress, new challenges and the situation worldwide Postgrad Med J 2015 91 1080 572 578 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133475 26310266 · DOI
- [5]Morgan J Roberts S Maternal sepsis Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2013 40 1 69 87 10.1016/j.ogc.2012.11.007 23466138 · DOI
- [6]Chan GJ Lee AC Baqui AH Tan J Black RE Risk of early-onset neonatal infection with maternal infection or colonization: a global systematic review and meta-analysis PLoS Med 2013 10 8 e1001502 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001502 23976885 PMC3747995 · DOI · Paper page
- [7]Bellizzi S Bassat Q Ali MM Sobel HL Temmerman M Effect of puerperal infections on early neonatal mortality: a secondary analysis of Six demographic and health surveys PLoS One 2017 12 1 e0170856 10.1371/journal.pone.0170856 28122046 PMC5266333 · DOI
- [8]Anderson BL Puerperal group a streptococcal infection: beyond semmelweis Obstet Gynecol 2014 123 4 874 882 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000175 24785617 · DOI
- [9]Say L Chou D Gemmill A Tuncalp O Moller AB Daniels J Gulmezoglu AM Temmerman M Alkema L Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis Lancet Glob Health 2014 2 6 e323 e333 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X 25103301 · DOI · Paper page
- [10]Barton JR Sibai BM Severe sepsis and septic shock in pregnancy Obstet Gynecol 2012 120 3 689 706 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318263a52d 22914482 · DOI
- [11]Oud L Pregnancy-associated severe sepsis: contemporary state and future challenges Infect Dis Ther 2014 3 2 175 189 10.1007/s40121-014-0037-7 25199805 PMC4269633 · DOI
- [12]van Dillen J Zwart J Schutte J van Roosmalen J Maternal sepsis: epidemiology, etiology and outcome Curr Opin Infect Dis 2010 23 3 249 254 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328339257c 20375891 · DOI · Paper page
- [14]Kramer HM Schutte JM Zwart JJ Schuitemaker NW Steegers EA van Roosmalen J Maternal mortality and severe morbidity from sepsis in the Netherlands Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009 88 6 647 653 10.1080/00016340902926734 19412806 · DOI
- [15]Acosta CD Knight M Lee HC Kurinczuk JJ Gould JB Lyndon A The continuum of maternal sepsis severity: incidence and risk factors in a population-based cohort study PLoS One 2013 8 7 e67175 10.1371/journal.pone.0067175 23843991 PMC3699572 · DOI
- [17]Bone RC Balk RA Cerra FB Dellinger RP Fein AM Knaus WA Schein RM Sibbald WJ Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM consensus conference committee. American college of chest physicians/society of critical care medicine Chest 1992 101 6 1644 1655 10.1378/chest.101.6.1644 1303622 · DOI
- [18]Levy MM Fink MP Marshall JC Abraham E Angus D Cook D Cohen J Opal SM Vincent JL Ramsay G 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS international sepsis definitions conference Intensive Care Med 2003 29 4 530 538 10.1007/s00134-003-1662-x 12664219 · DOI
- [19]Dellinger RP Levy MM Rhodes A Annane D Gerlach H Opal SM Sevransky JE Sprung CL Douglas IS Jaeschke R Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012 Crit Care Med 2013 41 2 580 637 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af 23353941 · DOI · Paper page
- [20]Arulkumaran N Singer M Puerperal sepsis Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2013 27 6 893 902 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.07.004 23993724 · DOI
- [21]Bamfo JE Managing the risks of sepsis in pregnancy Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2013 27 4 583 595 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.04.003 23639681 · DOI
- [22]Chebbo A Tan S Kassis C Tamura L Carlson RW Maternal sepsis and septic shock Crit Care Clin 2016 32 1 119 135 10.1016/j.ccc.2015.08.010 26600449 · DOI
- [23]Cordioli RL Cordioli E Negrini R Silva E Sepsis and pregnancy: do we know how to treat this situation? Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2013 25 4 334 344 10.5935/0103-507X.20130056 24553516 PMC4031877 · DOI
- [24]Eschenbach DA Treating spontaneous and induced septic abortions Obstet Gynecol 2015 125 5 1042 1048 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000795 25932831 · DOI
- [25]Ford JM Scholefield H Sepsis in obstetrics: cause, prevention, and treatment Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2014 27 3 253 258 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000082 24751792 · DOI
- [26]Frise CJ Frise MC Nelson-Piercy C Management of the critically-ill obstetric patient Obstet Gynecol Reprod Med 2015 25 7 188 194 10.1016/j.ogrm.2015.04.002 · DOI
- [27]Guntupalli KK Karnad DR Bandi V Hall N Belfort M Critical illness in pregnancy part II: common medical conditions complicating pregnancy and puerperium Chest 2015 148 5 1333 1345 10.1378/chest.14-2365 26020727 · DOI
- [28]Hamilton SM Stevens DL Bryant AE Pregnancy-related group a streptococcal infections: temporal relationships between bacterial acquisition, infection onset, clinical findings, and outcome Clin Infect Dis 2013 57 6 870 876 10.1093/cid/cit282 23645851 PMC3749745 · DOI
- [29]Hashmi M Khan FH A review of critical care management of maternal sepsis Anaesthesia, Pain Intensive Care 2014 18 4 436 442
- [30]Karsnitz DB Puerperal infections of the genital tract: a clinical review J Midwifery Womens Health 2013 58 6 632 642 10.1111/jmwh.12119 24406036 · DOI
- [31]Lamy C Mezan de malartic C, perdriolle E, gauchotte E, villeroy-de-galhau S, delaporte MO, morel O, judlin P: [management of post-abortum infections] J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2012 41 8 904 912 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.025 23140618 · DOI
- [32]Lapinsky SE Obstetric infections Crit Care Clin 2013 29 3 509 520 10.1016/j.ccc.2013.03.006 23830651 · DOI · Paper page
- [33]Lucas DN Robinson PN Nel MR Sepsis in obstetrics and the role of the anaesthetist Int J Obstet Anesth 2012 21 1 56 67 10.1016/j.ijoa.2011.11.001 22168972 · DOI
- [34]Neligan PJ Laffey JG Clinical review: Special populations - critical illness and pregnancy Crit Care 2011 15 4 227 10.1186/cc10256 21888683 PMC3387584 · DOI
- [35]Oud L Pregnancy-associated severe sepsis Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2016 28 2 73 78 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000250 26825182 · DOI
- [36]Pacheco LD Saade GR Hankins GD Severe sepsis during pregnancy Clin Obstet Gynecol 2014 57 4 827 834 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000066 25286297 · DOI
- [37]Sriskandan S Severe peripartum sepsis J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2011 41 4 339 346 10.4997/JRCPE.2011.411 22184573 · DOI
- [38]Yamada T Yamada T Yamamura MK Katabami K Hayakawa M Tomaru U Shimada S Morikawa M Seki T Ariga S Invasive group a streptococcal infection in pregnancy J Infect 2010 60 6 417 424 10.1016/j.jinf.2010.03.011 20359498 · DOI
- [39]Sung E George J Porter M Sepsis in pregnancy Fetal Matern Med Rev 2011 22 4 287 305 10.1017/S0965539511000155 · DOI
- [41]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management; 2016. [ https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng51]. Accessed 10 Feb 2017. 32011837
- [52]Say L Souza JP Pattinson RC Maternal near miss--towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009 23 3 287 296 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.007 19303368 · DOI · Paper page
- [54]Edwards SE Grobman WA Lappen JR Winter C Fox R Lenguerrand E Draycott T Modified obstetric early warning scoring systems (MOEWS): validating the diagnostic performance for severe sepsis in women with chorioamnionitis Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 212 4 536e1 536e8 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.007 25446705 · DOI
- [55]Aarvold AB Ryan HM Magee LA von Dadelszen P Fjell C Walley KR Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score Is Superior to the Obstetric-Specific Sepsis in Obstetrics Score in Predicting Mortality in Septic Obstetric Patients Crit Care Med 2016 45 1 e49 e57 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002018 PMC5364515 27618276 · DOI
- [56]The Global Maternal and Neonatal Sepsis Initiative Working Group The Global Maternal and Neonatal Sepsis Initiative: a call for collaboration and action by 2030 Lancet Glob Health 2017 5 4) e390 e391 28215849
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bonet, M., Brizuela, V., Abalos, E., Cuesta, C., Baguiya, A., Chamillard, M., Fawole, B., Knight, M., Kouanda, S., Lumbiganon, P., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(20)30109-1 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Self-citationChapuma, C., Twabi, H. H., Monk, E. J. M., Jafali, J., Weeks, A., Beales, E., Kulapani, D., Selemani, A., Nliwasa, M., Gadama, L., et al. (2024) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-024-09855-3 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationMaternal sepsis in Italy: a prospective, population-based cohort and nested case-control study
Ornaghi, S., Maraschini, A., Buoncristiano, M., Corsi Decenti, E., Colciago, E., Cetin, I., Donati, S., & on behalf of the ItOSS-Regional Working Group (2022) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms11010105 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Adequate assessment of the burden associated with maternal sepsis has been challenging, due to the lack of a clear, evidence-based, and actionable definition of the condition [7].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIncidence and determinants of maternal sepsis in Ghana in the midst of a pandemic
Noora, C. L., Manu, A., Addo-Lartey, A., Mohammed, A. G., Ameme, D. K., Kenu, E., Torpey, K., & Adanu, R. (2022) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-022-05182-0 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“WHO now defines maternal sepsis as “organ dysfunction resulting from infection during pregnancy, childbirth, post-abortion, or postpartum period”, which includes 42 days after the pregnancy has terminated, irrespective of the cause [1].”
Background
- Authors
- Bonet, M., Nogueira Pileggi, V., Rijken, M. J., Coomarasamy, A., Lissauer, D., Souza, J. P., & Gülmezoglu, A. M.
- Affiliations
- World Health Organization (CH)
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- National Health Service (GB)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bonet, Mercedes
- ORCID
- Venue
- Reproductive Health
- Published
- 2017-05-30
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-67
- ISSN
- 1742-4755 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5450299
- OpenAlex
- W2617799798
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2018-01-08)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Reproductive Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research
- Utrecht University Medical Centre
- University of Birmingham
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Keywords
- maternal sepsis, sepsis definitions, organ dysfunction, postpartum infection, post-abortion infection, maternal infection, maternal morbidity, antimicrobial therapy, fluid resuscitation
- MeSH terms
- Consensus Statements as Topic, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Referral and Consultation, Prevalence, Sepsis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review