The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women’s perspectives on the measures that need to be taken to increase the use of health-care facility delivery service among slums women, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a qualitative study
Open accessAbstract
Background: Global strategies to target high maternal mortality ratios are focused on providing skilled attendance at delivery along with access to emergency obstetric care. Research that examines strategies to increase facility-based skilled birth attendance among slum residents in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, is limited. Objective: The study aimed to explore women's perspectives on the measures that need to be taken to increase the use of the facility—delivery service among slums women, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Methods: Qualitative exploratory and descriptive research designs were used. Participants in the study were women in the reproductive age group (18–49 years of age) living in the slum areas of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A purposive sampling strategy was used to select study participants. Potential participants' names were gathered from health facilities and followed to their homes for the study. Four audio-recorded focus group discussions [FGDs] were conducted with 32 participants from the three public health centers and one district hospital. The number of participants in FGDs was between 6 and 10 women. Data were analyzed simultaneously with data collection. Thematic analysis was used in data analysis, which entails three interconnected stages: data reduction, data display, and data conclusion. In addition, thematic analysis entailed evaluating the structure and content of textual data, identifying data themes, coding the themes, and then interpreting the structure and content of the themes. A codebook was first devised, discussed, and adopted by the writers before they could use this technique. Using the codebook, the theme codes were then manually produced. To explain the study results, verbatim excerpts from participants were given. The researcher used Techs' eight steps of qualitative data analysis method for analyzing the data. A multi-level life-course framework of facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) developed by Bohren et al. was used to frame the current study and link the findings of the study to the body of knowledge. Results: The FGDs included a total of 32 participants. The mean age of the overall sample was 32.6 years (± SD = 5.2). Participants' educational characteristics indicate that the majority (24 out of 32) was found to have no formal education, and two-thirds of participants were found to have one to five children. Three-fourths of them attended the ANC twice and they all gave birth to their last child at home. Two themes emerged from the analysis of focus group data, namely provision of quality, respectful and dignified midwifery care, and lack of awareness about facility delivery. These themes were described as a rich and comprehensive account of the views and suggestions made by focused antenatal care [FANC] participants on measures required to improve the use of the facility-delivery services. The findings of the study raise concerns about the effectiveness of FANC in encouraging facility-deliveries since FANC participants had not used health facilities for their last childbirth. According to the findings of the focus groups, women who took part in this study identified measures required to increase the use of health facility-delivery services among FANC participants in Addis Ababa's slum residents. It is to be expected that diligent counseling during antenatal care about birth plans would facilitate prompt arrival at facilities consistent with the desires of women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Research related to C-section deliveries among women in urban informal settlements and the reasons thereof has, however, been limited”
From "Everywhere you see, C-sections are happening": examining trends and reasons for a rise in cesarean-section deliveries among women in urban informal settlements, Mumbai Metropolitan Region, using a mixed methods approach (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 · Cited by 42,509
Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
Creswell, J. W. (1994) · Cited by 35,204
Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
Caldas, M. (2003) · Revista de Administração Contemporânea · doi:10.1590/s1415-65552003000100015 · Cited by 18,688
Ethiopia demographic and health survey, 2000
Central Statistical Agency, & Ethiopia (2017) · Cited by 3,873
Alkema, L., Chou, D., Hogan, D., Zhang, S., Moller, A.-B., Gemmill, A., Fat, D. M., Boerma, T., Temmerman, M., Mathers, C., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00838-7 · Cited by 2,261
Ishtiaq, M. (2019) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v12n5p40 · Cited by 1,502
Bohren, M. A., Hunter, E. C., Munthe-Kaas, H. M., Souza, J. P., Vogel, J. P., & Gülmezoglu, A. M. (2014) · Reproductive Health · doi:10.1186/1742-4755-11-71 · Cited by 823 · cited 5×
“The results of the research are consistent with prior studies [6, 9].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialFinlayson, K. W., & Downe, S. M. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001373 · Cited by 509
Barsan, V. V., Briceño, V., Gandhi, M., & Jea, A. H. (2016) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0735-5 · Cited by 435
Ng, S., Cameron, C. M., Hills, A. P., McClure, R., & Scuffham, P. (2014) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-14-314 · Cited by 398
Cited by
Yihune, M., Bante, A., Belete, A. G., Crutzen, R., Spigt, M., & Stutterheim, S. E. (2025) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-025-07225-8 · Cited by 73
Park, J., Kibe, P., Yeboah, G., Oyebode, O. O., Harris, B., Ajisola, M. M., Griffiths, F. E., Aujla, N., Gill, P. S., Lilford, R. J., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055415 · Cited by 44
Intrapartum respectful maternity care practices and its barriers in Eastern India
Yadav, P., Smitha, M. V., Jacob, J., & Begüm, J. (2022) · Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care · doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1032_22 · Cited by 24
Debie, A., Wassie, M. M., Roberts, C. T., Molla, M. D., Wilson, A. M., & Stephens, J. H. (2025) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-025-07995-1 · Cited by 4
Spencer, J., Rajan, S., Sawant, R., Patil, S., Pantvaidya, S., D’Souza, V., & Das, S. (2026) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-026-09160-8
“Research related to C-section deliveries among women in urban informal settlements and the reasons thereof has, however, been limited [24–27].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Sendo, E. G., Chauke, M. E., & Ganga-Limando, M.
- Affiliations
- Addis Ababa University (ET)
- University of South Africa (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Sendo, Endalew G.
- Venue
- Reproductive Health
- Published
- 2021-08-23
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 174-174
- ISSN
- 1742-4755 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8381586
- OpenAlex
- W3195562875
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Reproductive Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Addis Ababa University
- University of South Africa
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Keywords
- institutional delivery, skilled birth attendance, maternal health service utilization, slum women, women's perspectives, home birth, quality of care, maternal mortality, low- and middle-income countries, emergency obstetric care, prenatal care, maternal health policy, healthcare workers
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Ethiopia, Female, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Middle Aged, Poverty Areas, Pregnancy, Parturition, Delivery, Obstetric, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review