Cited by 15Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityLanguage Development and Disorders

Multisensory cueing facilitates naming in aphasia

Open access
Grechuta, Klaudia, Rubio Ballester, Belén, Espín Munné, Rosa, Usabiaga Bernal, Teresa, Molina Hervás, Begoña, Mohr, Bettina, Pulvermüller, Friedemann, San Segundo, Rosa Maria +1 more·2020·Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Impaired naming is a ubiquitous symptom in all types of aphasia, which often adversely impacts independence, quality of life, and recovery of affected individuals. Previous research has demonstrated that naming can be facilitated by phonological and semantic cueing strategies that are largely incorporated into the treatment of anomic disturbances. Beneficial effects of cueing, whereby naming becomes faster and more accurate, are often attributed to the priming mechanisms occurring within the distributed language network. Objective: We proposed and explored two novel cueing techniques: (1) Silent Visuomotor Cues (SVC), which provided articulatory information of target words presented in the form of silent videos, and (2) Semantic Auditory Cues (SAC), which consisted of acoustic information semantically relevant to target words (ringing for “telephone”). Grounded in neurophysiological evidence, we hypothesized that both SVC and SAC might aid communicative effectiveness possibly by triggering activity in perceptual and semantic language regions, respectively. Methods: Ten participants with chronic non-fluent aphasia were recruited for a longitudinal clinical intervention. Participants were split into dyads (i.e., five pairs of two participants) and required to engage in a turn-based peer-to-peer language game using the Rehabilitation Gaming System for aphasia (RGSa). The objective of the RGSa sessions was to practice communicative acts, such as making a request. We administered SVCs and SACs in a pseudorandomized manner at the moment when the active player selected the object to be requested from the interlocutor. For the analysis, we compared the times from selection to the reception of the desired object between cued and non-cued trials. Results: Naming accuracy, as measured by a standard clinical scale, significantly improved for all stimuli at each evaluation point, including the follow-up. Moreover, the results yielded beneficial effects of both SVC and SAC cues on word naming, especially at the early intervention sessions when the exposure to the target lexicon was infrequent. Conclusions: This study supports the efficacy of the proposed cueing strategies which could be integrated into the clinic or mobile technology to aid naming even at the chronic stages of aphasia. These findings are consistent with sensorimotor accounts of language processing, suggesting a coupling between language, motor, and semantic brain regions. Trial registration: NCT02928822 . Registered 30 May 2016.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12984-020-00751-w

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of studies reported item-specific gains without significant transfer beyond trained targets.

    “The majority of studies reported item‐specific gains without significant transfer beyond trained targets (e.g., Upton et al. 2024; Grechuta et al. 2020)”

    From Exploring the Effectiveness of Technology‐Based Interventions in Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Grechuta et al. 2020

    The Methods (Measures) say the naming test included all trained items, and the Results report significant improvement on that test. The Discussion says generalization would be analysed in follow-up studies; this paper therefore supports gains on trained items but does not establish an absence of significant transfer beyond them. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. [1]Engelter ST Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis Stroke 2006 37 6 1379 1384 16690899
  2. [3]Laine M, Martin N. Brain damage, behaviour and cognition. Anomia: theoretical and clinical aspects. Psychology Press. 2006.
  3. [5]Schwartz MF. Theoretical analysis of word production deficits in adult aphasia. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2014;369(1634) Royal Society. PMC3866420 24324234
  4. [6]Levelt WJM Roelofs A Meyer AS A theory of lexical access in speech production Behav Brain Sci 1999 22 1 1 75 11301520
  5. [7]Oldfield RC Things, words and the brain* Q J Exp Psychol 1966 18 4 340 353 5956077
  6. [9]Levelt WJM Spoken word production: a theory of lexical access Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001 98 23 13464 13471 11698690 PMC60894
  7. [13]Heath S Neural mechanisms underlying the facilitation of naming in aphasia using a semantic task: an fMRI study BMC Neurosci 2012 13 1 98 22882806 PMC3477078
  8. [16]van Hees S Angwin A McMahon K Copland D A comparison of semantic feature analysis and phonological components analysis for the treatment of naming impairments in aphasia Neuropsychol Rehabil 2013 23 1 102 132 23098246
  9. [18]Meteyard L Bose A What does a cue do? Comparing phonological and semantic cues for picture naming in aphasia J Speech, Lang Hear Res 2018 61 3 658 674 29486495
  10. [20]Kurland J Wilkins A Stokes P iPractice: piloting the effectiveness of a tablet-based home practice program in aphasia treatment Semin Speech Lang 2014 35 01 051 064 PMC3931518 24449465
  11. [22]Grechuta K Augmented dyadic therapy boosts recovery of language function in patients with nonfluent aphasia Stroke 2019 50 5 1270 1274 30913976
  12. [24]Lavoie M Macoir J Bier N Effectiveness of technologies in the treatment of post-stroke anomia: a systematic review J Commun Disord 2017 65 43 53 28171741
  13. [27]Madden E Robinson R Kendall D Phonological treatment approaches for spoken word production in aphasia Semin Speech Lang 2017 38 01 062 074 28201838
  14. [28]Nardo D Holland R Leff AP Price CJ Crinion JT Less is more: neural mechanisms underlying anomia treatment in chronic aphasic patients Brain 2017 140 11 3039 3054 29053773 PMC5808641
  15. [30]Howard D Hickin J Redmond T Clark P Best W Re-visiting ‘semantic facilitation’ of word retrieval for people with aphasia: facilitation yes but semantic no Cortex 2006 42 6 946 962 17131601
  16. [34]Wyss R König P Verschure PFMJF Konig P A model of the ventral visual system based on temporal stability and local memory PLoS Biol 2006 4 5 120 PMC1436026 16605306
  17. [36]Mcgurk H Macdonald J Hearing lips and seeing voices Nature 1976 264 5588 746 748 1012311
  18. [37]Grechuta K The effects of silent visuomotor cueing on word retrieval in Broca’s aphasies: A pilot study Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 2017 International Conference on 2017 193 199 28813817
  19. [38]Ojemann G Ojemann J Lettich E Berger M Cortical language localization in left, dominant hemisphere. An electrical stimulation mapping investigation in 117 patients J Neurosurg 1989 71 3 316 326 2769383
  20. [39]Duffau H, Capelle L, Denvil D, Gatignol P, N. S.- Neuroimage, and undefined 2003. The role of dominant premotor cortex in language: a study using intraoperative functional mapping in awake patients. Elsevier.. 14683696
  21. [40]Petrides M Cadoret G Mackey S Orofacial somatomotor responses in the macaque monkey homologue of Broca’s area Nature 2005 435 7046 1235 1238 15988526
  22. [41]Nishitani N Hari R Viewing lip forms: cortical dynamics Neuron 2002 36 6 1211 1220 12495633
  23. [42]Kiefer M Sim EJ Herrnberger B Grothe J Hoenig K The sound of concepts: four markers for a link between auditory and conceptual brain systems J Neurosci 2008 28 47 12224 12230 19020016 PMC6671691
  24. [43]Kiefer M Pulvermüller F Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions Cortex 2012 48 7 805 825 21621764
  25. [44]Segaert K Menenti L Weber K Petersson KM Hagoort P Shared syntax in language production and language comprehension--an fMRI study Cereb Cortex 2012 22 7 1662 1670 21934094 PMC3377967
  26. [45]Rodd JM Longe OA Randall B Tyler LK The functional organisation of the fronto-temporal language system: evidence from syntactic and semantic ambiguity Neuropsychologia 2010 48 5 1324 1335 20038434
  27. [46]Acheson DJ Hagoort P Stimulating the brain’s language network: syntactic ambiguity resolution after TMS to the inferior frontal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus J Cogn Neurosci 2013 25 10 1664 1677 23767923
  28. [47]Hickok G. Speech Perception, Conduction Aphasia, and the Functional Neuroanatomy of Language. In: Language and the Brain: Elsevier; 2000. p. 87–104.
  29. [48]WISE R CHOLLET F HADAR U FRISTON K HOFFNER E FRACKOWIAK R Distribution of cortical neural networks involved in word comprehension and word retrieval Brain 1991 114 4 1803 1817 1884179
  30. [49]Price CJ Hearing and saying Brain 1996 119 3 919 931 8673502
  31. [50]Paus T Perry DW Zatorre RJ Worsley KJ Evans AC Modulation of cerebral blood flow in the human auditory cortex during speech: role of motor-to-sensory discharges Eur J Neurosci 1996 8 11 2236 2246 8950088
  32. [51]Töpper R Mottaghy FM Brügmann M Noth J Huber W Facilitation of picture naming by focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of Wernicke’s area Exp Brain Res 1998 121 4 371 378 9746143
  33. [52]Bookheimer SY, Zeffiro TA, Blaxton T, Gaillard W, Theodore W. Regional cerebral blood flow during object naming and word reading. Hum Brain Mapp. 995;3(2):93–106.
  34. [53]& U, Hickok G, Erhard P, Kassubek J, Helms-Tillery AK, Naeve-Velguth S, Strupp JP, Strick PL. KAuditory cortex participates in speech production. Cogn Neurosci Soc Abstr. 1999;97. 10854735
  35. [56]Maier M Rubio Ballester B Duff A Duarte Oller E Verschure PFMJ Effect of Specific Over Nonspecific VR-Based Rehabilitation on Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Systematic Meta-analysis Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2019 33 2 112 129 30700224 PMC6376608
  36. [58]Oldfield RC The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory Neuropsychologia 1971 9 1 97 113 5146491
  37. [59]Folstein MF Folstein SE McHugh PR ‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician J Psychiatr Res 1975 12 3 189 198 1202204
  38. [60]Fugl Meyer AR Jaasko L Leyman I The post stroke hemiplegic patient. I. a method for evaluation of physical performance Scand J Rehabil Med 1975 7 1 13 31 1135616
  39. [63]Pulvermüller F Berthier ML Aphasia therapy on a neuroscience basis Aphasiology 2008 22 6 563 599 18923644 PMC2557073
  40. [65]Alario FX Ferrand L Laganaro M New B Frauenfelder UH Segui J Predictors of picture naming speed Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2004 36 1 140 155 15190709
  41. [66]Kittredge AK Dell GS Verkuilen J Schwartz MF Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors Cogn Neuropsychol 2008 25 4 463 492 18704797 PMC2963561
  42. [67]Berthier ML Pulvermüller F Neuroscience insights improve neurorehabilitation of poststroke aphasia Nat Rev Neurol 2011 7 2 86 97 21297651
  43. [68]Stahl B Mohr B Dreyer FR Lucchese G Pulvermüller F Using language for social interaction: communication mechanisms promote recovery from chronic non-fluent aphasia Cortex 2016 85 90 99 27842269
  44. [69]Wallace SJ A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement Int J Stroke 2019 14 2 180 185 30303810
  45. [70]Pulvermüller F Fadiga L Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language Nat Rev Neurosci 2010 11 5 351 20383203

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grechuta, K., Rubio Ballester, B., Espín Munné, R., Usabiaga Bernal, T., Molina Hervás, B., Mohr, B., Pulvermüller, F., San Segundo, R. M., & Verschure, P. F. M. J.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (ES)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Verschure, Paul F. M. J.
Venue
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Published
2020-09-09
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
122-122
ISSN
1743-0003 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3083950940
Cited by
15
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rovira & Virgili repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • H2020 European Research Council (341196)
  • Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (SANAR)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (BES2014068791)
  • EIT Health (ID19277)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
aphasia, word naming, non-fluent aphasia, chronic aphasia, anomic aphasia
MeSH terms
Virtual Reality, Adult, Aged, Aphasia, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Speech Therapy, Video Games, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review