Cited by 62Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesPain Management and Opioid UseOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Barriers and enablers for deprescribing benzodiazepine receptor agonists in older adults: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies using the theoretical domains framework

Open access
Evrard, Perrine, Pétein, Catherine, Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste, Spinewine, Anne·2022·Implementation Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many strategies aimed at deprescribing benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRA) in older adults have already been evaluated with various success rates. There is so far no consensus on which strategy components increase deprescribing the most. Yet, despite an unfavourable benefit-to-risk ratio, BZRA use among older adults remains high. We systematically reviewed barriers and enablers for BZRA deprescribing in older adults. METHODS: Two reviewers independently screened records identified from five electronic databases-Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and the Cochrane library-and published before October 2020. They searched for grey literature using Google Scholar. Qualitative and quantitative records reporting data on the attitudes of older adults, caregivers and healthcare providers towards BZRA deprescribing were included. Populations at the end of life or with specific psychiatric illness, except for dementia, were excluded. The two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the included studies using the mixed-methods appraisal tool. Barriers and enablers were identified and then coded into domains of the theoretical domains framework (TDF) using a combination of deductive and inductive qualitative analysis. The most relevant TDF domains for BZRA deprescribing were then identified. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included 13 quantitative, 8 qualitative and 2 mixed-method studies. The points of view of older adults, general practitioners and nurses were reported in 19, 9 and 3 records, respectively. We identified barriers and enablers in the majority of TDF domains and in two additional themes: "patient characteristics" and "BZRA prescribing patterns". Overall, the most relevant TDF domains were "beliefs about capabilities", "beliefs about consequences", "environmental context and resources", "intention", "goals", "social influences", "memory, attention and decision processes". Perceived barriers and enablers within domains differed across settings and across stakeholders. CONCLUSION: The relevant TDF domains we identified can now be linked to behavioural change techniques to help in the design of future strategies and health policies. Future studies should also assess barriers and enablers perceived by under-evaluated stakeholders (such as pharmacists, psychiatrists and health care professionals in the hospital setting). TRIAL REGISTRATION: This work was registered on PROSPERO under the title "Barriers and enablers to benzodiazepine receptor agonists deprescribing". REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020213035.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13012-022-01206-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fragmented care can be a barrier to effective BZD tapering because attitudes, knowledge, and conflicting advice from a patient's medical teams and care partners can influence the BZD tapering process.

    “Fragmented care can be a barrier to effective BZD tapering because attitudes, knowledge, and conflicting advice from a patient’s medical teams (e.g., primary care, psychiatry, neurology, other specialty clinicians) and care partners can influence the BZD tapering process.92,169,170”

    From Joint Clinical Practice Guideline on Benzodiazepine Tapering: Considerations When Risks Outweigh Benefits (2025) · cites this paper as [169]

    The Results (Social influences; Social, professional role and identity; Knowledge; no page numbers provided) identify clinicians’ attitudes and knowledge, patients’ reliance on GP advice, and scarce multidisciplinary collaboration as factors in BZRA deprescribing. The review does not establish that conflicting advice across medical teams or care partners impedes tapering; its Discussion (Recommendations for future research) says relatives and informal caregivers were not included in the reviewed studies. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Barriers and enablers of BZD deprescribing success are being increasingly understood from the exploration of patient and prescriber experiences.

    “Barriers and enablers of BZD deprescribing success are being increasingly understood from the exploration of the patient and prescriber experiences.165”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 62

Authors
Evrard, P., Pétein, C., Beuscart, J.-B., & Spinewine, A.
Affiliations
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Université de Lille (FR)
  • CHU Dinant Godinne UCL Namur (BE)
Corresponding author
Evrard, Perrine
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2022-07-08
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
41-41
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4284889623
Cited by
62
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • LillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
benzodiazepine receptor agonists, deprescribing, older adults, barriers and facilitators, Theoretical Domains Framework, clinician attitudes, caregiver attitudes, patient attitudes, prescribing patterns, behaviour change techniques, general practitioners, nurses, polypharmacy, cognitive impairment, dementia, end-of-life care, health policy, behavioral interventions, stakeholder perspectives
MeSH terms
Deprescriptions, Aged, Humans, Pharmacists, Receptors, GABA-A, Intention, Qualitative Research, General Practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review