Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 396

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation

Open access
Pisano, Michele, Zorcolo, Luigi, Merli, Cecilia, Cimbanassi, Stefania, Poiasina, Elia, Ceresoli, Marco, Agresta, Ferdinando, Allievi, Niccolò, Bellanova, Giovanni, Coccolini, Federico, Coy, Claudio, Fugazzola, Paola, Martinez, Carlos Augusto, Montori, Giulia, Paolillo, Ciro, Penachim, Thiago Josè, Pereira, Bruno, Reis, Tarcisio, Restivo, Angelo, Rezende-Neto, Joao, Sartelli, Massimo, Valentino, Massimo, Abu-Zidan, Fikri M., Ashkenazi, Itamar, Bala, Miklosh, Chiara, Osvaldo, de’ Angelis, Nicola, Deidda, Simona, De Simone, Belinda, Di Saverio, Salomone, Finotti, Elena, Kenji, Inaba, Moore, Ernest, Wexner, Steven, Biffl, Walter, Coimbra, Raul, Guttadauro, Angelo, Leppäniemi, Ari, Maier, Ron, Magnone, Stefano, Mefire, Alain Chicom, Peitzmann, Andrew, Sakakushev, Boris, Sugrue, Michael, Viale, Pierluigi, Weber, Dieter, Kashuk, Jeffry, Fraga, Gustavo P., Kluger, Ioran, Catena, Fausto, Ansaloni, Luca·2018·World Journal of Emergency Surgery

Abstract

ᅟ: Obstruction and perforation due to colorectal cancer represent challenging matters in terms of diagnosis, life-saving strategies, obstruction resolution and oncologic challenge. The aims of the current paper are to update the previous WSES guidelines for the management of large bowel perforation and obstructive left colon carcinoma (OLCC) and to develop new guidelines on obstructive right colon carcinoma (ORCC). Methods: The literature was extensively queried for focused publication until December 2017. Precise analysis and grading of the literature has been performed by a working group formed by a pool of experts: the statements and literature review were presented, discussed and voted at the Consensus Conference of the 4th Congress of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) held in Campinas in May 2017. Results: CT scan is the best imaging technique to evaluate large bowel obstruction and perforation. For OLCC, self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS), when available, offers interesting advantages as compared to emergency surgery; however, the positioning of SEMS for surgically treatable causes carries some long-term oncologic disadvantages, which are still under analysis. In the context of emergency surgery, resection and primary anastomosis (RPA) is preferable to Hartmann's procedure, whenever the characteristics of the patient and the surgeon are permissive. Right-sided loop colostomy is preferable in rectal cancer, when preoperative therapies are predicted.With regards to the treatment of ORCC, right colectomy represents the procedure of choice; alternatives, such as internal bypass and loop ileostomy, are of limited value.Clinical scenarios in the case of perforation might be dramatic, especially in case of free faecal peritonitis. The importance of an appropriate balance between life-saving surgical procedures and respect of oncologic caveats must be stressed. In selected cases, a damage control approach may be required.Medical treatments including appropriate fluid resuscitation, early antibiotic treatment and management of co-existing medical conditions according to international guidelines must be delivered to all patients at presentation. Conclusions: The current guidelines offer an extensive overview of available evidence and a qualitative consensus regarding management of large bowel obstruction and perforation due to colorectal cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13017-018-0192-3

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 91 references

Cited by

See all 396

Metadata

Authors
Pisano, M., Zorcolo, L., Merli, C., Cimbanassi, S., Poiasina, E., Ceresoli, M., Agresta, F., Allievi, N., Bellanova, G., Coccolini, F., Coy, C., Fugazzola, P., Martinez, C. A., Montori, G., Paolillo, C., Penachim, T. J., Pereira, B., Reis, T., Restivo, A., Rezende-Neto, J., Sartelli, M., Valentino, M., Abu-Zidan, F. M., Ashkenazi, I., Bala, M., Chiara, O., de’ Angelis, N., Deidda, S., De Simone, B., Di Saverio, S., Finotti, E., Kenji, I., Moore, E., Wexner, S., Biffl, W., Coimbra, R., Guttadauro, A., Leppäniemi, A., Maier, R., Magnone, S., Mefire, A. C., Peitzmann, A., Sakakushev, B., Sugrue, M., Viale, P., Weber, D., Kashuk, J., Fraga, G. P., Kluger, I., Catena, F., & Ansaloni, L.
Venue
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
Published
2018-08-13
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
36-36
ISSN
1749-7922 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2887426913
Cited by
396
References
91
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13017-018-0192-3
The paper
Pisano, M., Zorcolo, L., Merli, C., Cimbanassi, S., Poiasina, E., Ceresoli, M., Agresta, F., Allievi, N., Bellanova, G., Coccolini, F., Coy, C., Fugazzola, P., Martinez, C. A., Montori, G., Paolillo, C., Penachim, T. J., Pereira, B., Reis, T., Restivo, A., . . . Ansaloni, L. (2018). 2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0192-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.