Cited by 0Aortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesAortic aneurysm repair treatmentsConnective tissue disorders research

Risk factors and prognosis of postoperative hepatic dysfunction after Stanford type A aortic dissection repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Liu, Hongtao, Arjune, Ronecca, Xie, Aini·2026·Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery

Abstract

Evidence on postoperative hepatic dysfunction after Stanford type A aortic dissection repair remains limited. Existing studies have used heterogeneous definitions and have reported inconsistent perioperative factors and clinical outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the incidence of postoperative hepatic dysfunction, summarize associated perioperative variables, and evaluate its association with short-term postoperative outcomes. PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for clinical studies investigating postoperative hepatic dysfunction in patients undergoing surgical repair for Stanford type A aortic dissection. Pooled analyses were performed to estimate the incidence of postoperative hepatic dysfunction and its associations with perioperative variables and postoperative outcomes. A total of 960 records were identified, and nine single-center retrospective cohort studies involving 3,234 patients were included. The pooled incidence of postoperative hepatic dysfunction was 37%. Male sex was associated with postoperative hepatic dysfunction (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10–1.64, I 2 = 0%). Compared with patients without postoperative hepatic dysfunction, those who developed postoperative hepatic dysfunction had higher preoperative white blood cell counts (MD 0.94 × 10⁹/L, 95% CI 0.21–1.67, I 2 = 67%), longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (MD 21.29 min, 95% CI 11.25–31.34, I 2 = 85%), longer aortic cross-clamp time (MD 11.57 min, 95% CI 7.88–15.26, I 2 = 52%), and greater perioperative red blood cell transfusion volume (MD 1.90 units, 95% CI 0.92–2.88, I 2 = 90%). Postoperative hepatic dysfunction was also associated with higher odds of short-term mortality (OR 5.59, 95% CI 3.96–7.88, I 2 = 0%) and acute kidney injury (OR 5.62, 95% CI 4.16–7.59, I 2 = 30%), as well as longer intensive care unit stay (MD 60.18 h, 95% CI 54.83–65.53, I 2 = 23%). Postoperative hepatic dysfunction was common after Stanford type A aortic dissection repair and was associated with worse short-term postoperative outcomes. Several preoperative and intraoperative variables were associated with postoperative hepatic dysfunction; however, the available evidence was limited by retrospective study designs, heterogeneous definitions, and residual confounding. Future multicenter studies using standardized definitions and systematically collected malperfusion-related, operative, and perfusion-related variables are needed to clarify its clinical significance and support risk-stratification research. PROSPERO CRD420251234391.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13019-026-04486-y

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41

Authors
Liu, H., Arjune, R., & Xie, A.
Affiliations
Tongji Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Xie, Aini
Venue
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Published
2026-06-26
Volume
21
Issue
1
ISSN
1749-8090 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7166016197
Cited by
0
References
41
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
Keywords
type A aortic dissection, aortic dissection repair, risk factors, prognosis, cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamp time, red blood cell transfusion, white blood cell count, short-term mortality, acute kidney injury, ICU length of stay, postoperative outcomes, incidence, sex differences, postoperative complications
MeSH terms
Dissection, Ascending Aorta, Aortic Dissection, Humans, Liver Diseases, Postoperative Complications, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review