APOE effects on regional tau in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease
Open accessAbstract
Background: APOE variants are strongly associated with abnormal amyloid aggregation and additional direct effects of APOE on tau aggregation are reported in animal and human cell models. The degree to which these effects are present in humans when individuals are clinically unimpaired (CU) but have abnormal amyloid (Aβ+) remains unclear. Methods: We analyzed data from CU individuals in the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic AD (A4) and Longitudinal Evaluation of Amyloid Risk and Neurodegeneration (LEARN) studies. Amyloid PET data were available for 4486 participants (3163 Aβ-, 1323 Aβ+) and tau PET data were available for a subset of 447 participants (55 Aβ-, 392 Aβ+). Linear models examined APOE (number of e2 and e4 alleles) associations with global amyloid and regional tau burden in medial temporal lobe (entorhinal, amygdala) and early neocortical regions (inferior temporal, inferior parietal, precuneus). Consistency of APOE 4 effects on regional tau were examined in 220 Aβ + CU and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) participants from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Results: APOE 2 and APOE 4 were associated with lower and higher amyloid positivity rates, respectively. Among Aβ+ CU, e2 and e4 were associated with reduced (−12 centiloids per allele) and greater (+15 centiloids per allele) continuous amyloid burden, respectively. APOE 2 was associated with reduced regional tau in all regions (-0.05 to -0.09 SUVR per allele), whereas APOE 4 was associated with greater regional tau (+0.02 to +0.07 SUVR per allele). APOE differences were confirmed by contrasting e3/e3 with e2/e3 and e3/e4. Mediation analyses among Aβ+ s showed that direct effects of e2 on regional tau were present in medial temporal lobe and early neocortical regions, beyond an indirect pathway mediated by continuous amyloid burden. For e4, direct effects on regional tau were only significant in medial temporal lobe. The magnitude of protective e2 effects on regional tau was consistent across brain regions, whereas detrimental e4 effects were greatest in medial temporal lobe. APOE 4 patterns were confirmed in Aβ+ ADNI participants. Conclusions: APOE influences early regional tau PET burden, above and beyond effects related to cross-sectional amyloid PET burden. Therapeutic strategies targeting underlying mechanisms related to APOE may modify tau accumulation among Aβ+ individuals.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Entorhinal cortex is a site of preclinical neuropathological tau deposition that is elevated for APOE4 carriers.
“The regional specificity of these findings aligns with evidence that entorhinal cortex is a site of preclinical neuropathological tau deposition that is elevated for APOE4 carriers [37] and predicts cognitive decline [38], and which undergoes accelerated atrophy in preclinical AD [39].”
From Effects of APOE2 and APOE4 on brain microstructure in older adults: modification by age, sex, and cognitive status (2024) · cites this paper as [37]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 83 · Cited by 80
- Authors
- Young, C. B., Johns, E., Kennedy, G., Belloy, M. E., Insel, P. S., Greicius, M. D., Sperling, R. A., Johnson, K. A., Poston, K. L., Mormino, E. C., Initiative, F. T. A. D. N., & the A4 Study Team
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Young, Christina B.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Molecular Neurodegeneration
- Published
- 2023-01-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1750-1326 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9811772
- OpenAlex
- W4313455452
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 9
- FWCI
- 14.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Molecular Neurodegeneration (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institute of Aging (K99AG071837, K99AG075238, P30AG066515, K01AG051718, P01AG036694, P50AG005134, U24AG074855)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS115114)
- Alzheimer's Association (AARFD-21-849349, AARF-20-683984)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Keywords
- apolipoprotein E, APOE ε4, APOE2, preclinical Alzheimer's disease, tau PET, amyloid PET, amyloid fibril formation, medial temporal lobe, entorhinal cortex, amygdala, mild cognitive impairment, A4 study, ADNI, mediation analysis, genetic risk
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Animals, Brain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Positron-Emission Tomography, Apolipoprotein E4, Apolipoprotein E2, Amyloidogenic Proteins, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review