Roadmap to strengthen global mental health systems to tackle the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The COVID pandemic has been devastating for not only its direct impact on lives, physical health, socio-economic status of individuals, but also for its impact on mental health. Some individuals are affected psychologically more severely and will need additional care. However, the current health system is so fragmented and focused on caring for those infected that management of mental illness has been neglected. An integrated approach is needed to strengthen the health system, service providers and research to not only manage the current mental health problems related to COVID but develop robust strategies to overcome more long-term impact of the pandemic. A series of recommendations are outlined in this paper to help policy makers, service providers and other stakeholders, and research and research funders to strengthen existing mental health systems, develop new ones, and at the same time advance research to mitigate the mental health impact of COVID19. The recommendations refer to low, middle and high resource settings as capabilities vary greatly between countries and within countries. DISCUSSION: The recommendations for policy makers are focused on strengthening leadership and governance, finance mechanisms, and developing programme and policies that especially include the most vulnerable populations. Service provision should focus on accessible and equitable evidence-based community care models commensurate with the existing mental health capacity to deliver care, train existing primary care staff to cater to increased mental health needs, implement prevention and promotion programmes tailored to local needs, and support civil societies and employers to address the increased burden of mental illness. Researchers and research funders should focus on research to develop robust information systems that can be enhanced further by linking with other data sources to run predictive models using artificial intelligence, understand neurobiological mechanisms and community-based interventions to address the pandemic driven mental health problems in an integrated manner and use innovative digital solutions. CONCLUSION: Urgent action is needed to strengthen mental health system in all settings. The recommendations outlined can be used as a guide to develop these further or identify new ones in relation to local needs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Those themes (third cluster) appear to be still early in their development, but they have a great potential for growth, possibly fuelled by a greater variation in discussions and approaches to mental health prevention driven by the COVID-19 impact and the challenges posed for sustainable healthcare in the future.
“Those themes appear to be still early in their development, but they have a great potential for growth, possibly fuelled by a greater variation in discussions and approaches to mental health prevention driven by the COVID-19 impact and the challenges posed for sustainable healthcare in the future [75,76,77].”
From Evolution of Primary Research Studies in Digital Interventions for Mental Well-Being Promotion from 2004 to 2023: A Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on the Web of Science (2024) · cites this paper as [75]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 84
- Authors
- Maulik, P. K., Thornicroft, G., & Saxena, S.
- Affiliations
- Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
- King's College London (GB)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Maulik, Pallab K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Mental Health Systems
- Published
- 2020-07-29
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-57
- ISSN
- 1752-4458 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7389161
- OpenAlex
- W3046113880
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Mental Health Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Department of Health and Social Care
- King's College London
- National Institutes of Health
- Medical Research Council (MR/R023697/1, MR/S001255/1)
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1143911)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH100470)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, mental health outcomes, health system strengthening, mental health policy, mental health funding, primary care mental health, community mental health services, vulnerable populations, artificial intelligence in mental health, low- and middle-income countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review