Cited by 305Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research

Long-term survival in patients treated with ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis: COMFORT-I and -II pooled analyses

Open access
Verstovsek, Srdan, Gotlib, Jason, Mesa, Ruben A., Vannucchi, Alessandro M., Kiladjian, Jean-Jacques, Cervantes, Francisco, Harrison, Claire N., Paquette, Ronald +6 more·2017·Journal of Hematology & Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myelofibrosis (MF) is associated with a variety of burdensome symptoms and reduced survival compared with age-/sex-matched controls. This analysis evaluated the long-term survival benefit with ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor, in patients with intermediate-2 (int-2) or high-risk MF. METHODS: This was an exploratory analysis of 5-year data pooled from the phase 3 COMFORT-I and -II trials. In both trials, patients could cross over to ruxolitinib from the control group (COMFORT-I, placebo; COMFORT-II, best available therapy). All continuing patients in the control groups crossed over to ruxolitinib by the 3-year follow-up. Overall survival (OS; a secondary endpoint in both trials) was evaluated using pooled intent-to-treat data from patients randomized to ruxolitinib or the control groups. OS was also evaluated in subgroups stratified by baseline anemia and transfusion status at week 24. RESULTS: A total of 528 patients were included in this analysis; 301 were originally randomized to ruxolitinib (COMFORT-I, n = 155; COMFORT-II, n = 146) and 227 to control (n = 154 and n = 73, respectively). The risk of death was reduced by 30% among patients randomized to ruxolitinib compared with patients in the control group (median OS, 5.3 vs 3.8 years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.70 [95% CI, 0.54-0.91]; P = 0.0065). After correcting for crossover using a rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) method, the OS advantage was more pronounced for patients who were originally randomized to ruxolitinib compared with patients who crossed over from control to ruxolitinib (median OS, 5.3 vs 2.3 years; HR [ruxolitinib vs RPSFT], 0.35 [95% CI, 0.23-0.59]). An analysis of OS censoring patients at the time of crossover also demonstrated that ruxolitinib prolonged OS compared with control (median OS, 5.3 vs 2.4 years; HR [ruxolitinib vs censored at crossover], 0.53 [95% CI, 0.36-0.78]; P = 0.0013). The survival benefit with ruxolitinib was observed irrespective of baseline anemia status or transfusion requirements at week 24. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support ruxolitinib treatment for patients with int-2 or high-risk MF, regardless of anemia or transfusion status. Further analyses will be important for exploring ruxolitinib earlier in the disease course to assess the effect on the natural history of MF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT00952289 and NCT00934544 .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13045-017-0527-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Treatment with ruxolitinib resulted in clinical improvements in polycythemia vera and increased survival in primary myelofibrosis.

    “Treatment with the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib resulted in clinical improvements in polycythemia vera and an increased survival in primary myelofibrosis. 32 , 33”

    From Sepsis induces interleukin 6, gp130/JAK2/STAT3, and muscle wasting (2022) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Results report longer overall survival with ruxolitinib than with control in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis. The Background says this population includes primary myelofibrosis, but the reported survival result is for myelofibrosis overall, not a primary-myelofibrosis subgroup. This paper does not evaluate clinical improvement in polycythemia vera; the sentence also cites another source for that part. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [2]Mesa R Miller CB Thyne M Mangan J Goldberger S Fazal S Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) have a significant impact on patients’ overall health and productivity: the MPN Landmark survey BMC Cancer 2016 16 167 10.1186/s12885-016-2208-2 26922064 PMC4769833 · DOI
  2. [3]Hultcrantz M Kristinsson SY Andersson TM Landgren O Eloranta S Derolf AR Patterns of survival among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms diagnosed in Sweden from 1973 to 2008: a population-based study J Clin Oncol 2012 30 2995 3001 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.1925 22802311 PMC3417050 · DOI
  3. [4]Cervantes F Dupriez B Pereira A Passamonti F Reilly JT Morra E New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment Blood 2009 113 2895 2901 10.1182/blood-2008-07-170449 18988864 · DOI
  4. [5]Gangat N Caramazza D Vaidya R George G Begna K Schwager S DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status J Clin Oncol 2011 29 392 397 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2446 21149668 · DOI
  5. [8]Verstovsek S Mesa RA Gotlib J Levy RS Gupta V DiPersio JF A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis N Engl J Med 2012 366 799 807 10.1056/NEJMoa1110557 22375971 PMC4822164 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [9]Cervantes F Vannucchi AM Kiladjian JJ Al-Ali HK Sirulnik A Stalbovskaya V Three-year efficacy, safety, and survival findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study comparing ruxolitinib with best available therapy for myelofibrosis Blood 2013 122 4047 4053 10.1182/blood-2013-02-485888 24174625 · DOI
  7. [10]Harrison C Kiladjian JJ Al-Ali HK Gisslinger H Waltzman R Stalbovskaya V JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis N Engl J Med 2012 366 787 798 10.1056/NEJMoa1110556 22375970 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [11]Gupta V Harrison C Hexner EO Al-Ali HK Foltz L Montgomery M The impact of anemia on overall survival in patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib in the COMFORT studies Haematologica 2016 101 e482 e4e4 10.3324/haematol.2016.151449 27587385 PMC5479619 · DOI
  9. [12]Verstovsek S Mesa RA Gotlib J Levy RS Gupta V DiPersio JF Efficacy, safety, and survival with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis: results of a median 3-year follow-up of COMFORT-I Haematologica 2015 100 479 488 10.3324/haematol.2014.115840 25616577 PMC4380721 · DOI
  10. [14]Al-Ali HK Stalbovskaya V Gopalakrishna P Perez-Ronco J Foltz L Impact of ruxolitinib treatment on the hemoglobin dynamics and the negative prognosis of anemia in patients with myelofibrosis Leuk Lymphoma 2016 57 2464 2467 10.3109/10428194.2016.1146950 26916563 · DOI
  11. [15]Passamonti F Cervantes F Vannucchi AM Morra E Rumi E Pereira A A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment) Blood 2010 115 1703 1708 10.1182/blood-2009-09-245837 20008785 · DOI
  12. [16]Gowin K Kosiorek H Dueck A Mascarenhas J Hoffman R Reeder C Multicenter phase 2 study of combination therapy with ruxolitinib and danazol in patients with myelofibrosis Leuk Res 2017 60 31 35 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.06.005 28646676 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verstovsek, S., Gotlib, J., Mesa, R. A., Vannucchi, A. M., Kiladjian, J.-J., Cervantes, F., Harrison, C. N., Paquette, R., Sun, W., Naim, A., Langmuir, P., Dong, T., Gopalakrishna, P., & Gupta, V.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Cancer Institute (US)
  • Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio (US)
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • Incyte (United States) (US)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
Published
2017-09-29
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
156-156
ISSN
1756-8722 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2759277150
Cited by
305
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 17 · 2016: 1
FWCI
14.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Hematology & Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Incyte Corporation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Keywords
myelofibrosis, ruxolitinib, JAK1/2 inhibitor, overall survival, long-term survival, crossover, anemia, transfusion dependence, best available therapy
MeSH terms
Anemia, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Nitriles, Pyrazoles, Pyrimidines, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression, Primary Myelofibrosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review