Cited by 117Metabolism, Diabetes, and CancerPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism

Changes in Insulin Receptor Signaling Underlie Neoadjuvant Metformin Administration in Breast Cancer: A Prospective Window of Opportunity Neoadjuvant Study

Open access
Dowling, Ryan JO, Niraula, Saroj, Chang, Martin C, Done, Susan J, Ennis, Marguerite, McCready, David R, Leong, Wey L, Escallon, Jaime M +3 more·2015·Breast Cancer Research

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The antidiabetic drug metformin exhibits potential anticancer properties that are believed to involve both direct (insulin-independent) and indirect (insulin-dependent) actions. Direct effects are linked to activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and an inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin mTOR signaling, and indirect effects are mediated by reductions in circulating insulin, leading to reduced insulin receptor (IR)-mediated signaling. However, the in vivo impact of metformin on cancer cell signaling and the factors governing sensitivity in patients remain unknown. METHODS: We conducted a neoadjuvant, single-arm, "window of opportunity" trial to examine the clinical and biological effects of metformin on patients with breast cancer. Women with untreated breast cancer who did not have diabetes were given 500 mg of metformin three times daily for ≥2 weeks after diagnostic biopsy until surgery. Fasting blood and tumor samples were collected at diagnosis and surgery. Blood glucose and insulin were assayed to assess the physiologic effects of metformin, and immunohistochemical analysis of tumors was used to characterize cellular markers before and after treatment. RESULTS: Levels of IR expression decreased significantly in tumors (P = 0.04), as did the phosphorylation status of protein kinase B (PKB)/Akt (S473), extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2, T202/Y204), AMPK (T172) and acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (S79) (P = 0.0001, P < 0.0001, P < 0.005 and P = 0.02, respectively). All tumors expressed organic cation transporter 1, with 90% (35 of 39) exhibiting an Allred score of 5 or higher. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced PKB/Akt and ERK1/2 phosphorylation, coupled with decreased insulin and IR levels, suggest insulin-dependent effects are important in the clinical setting. These results are consistent with beneficial anticancer effects of metformin and highlight key factors involved in sensitivity, which could be used to identify patients with breast cancer who may be responsive to metformin-based therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00897884. Registered 8 May 2009.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13058-015-0540-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 117

Authors
Dowling, R. J., Niraula, S., Chang, M. C., Done, S. J., Ennis, M., McCready, D. R., Leong, W. L., Escallon, J. M., Reedijk, M., Goodwin, P. J., & Stambolic, V.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • CancerCare Manitoba (CA)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Stambolic, Vuk
Venue
Breast Cancer Research
Published
2015-03-03
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
32-32
ISSN
  • 1465-5411 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-542X
OpenAlex
W2133721908
Cited by
117
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Breast Cancer Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Susan G. Komen
  • Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (10NOV-467)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Keywords
metformin, breast cancer, insulin receptor signaling, neoadjuvant therapy, AMPK, mTOR signaling, ERK1/2 phosphorylation, OCT1, Allred score, insulin resistance, anticancer drug sensitivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Metformin, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Phosphorylation, Receptor, Insulin, Signal Transduction, Biomarkers, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, Neoplasm Grading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review