Genomic landscape of oxidative DNA damage and repair reveals regioselective protection from mutagenesis
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
BACKGROUND: DNA is subject to constant chemical modification and damage, which eventually results in variable mutation rates throughout the genome. Although detailed molecular mechanisms of DNA damage and repair are well understood, damage impact and execution of repair across a genome remain poorly defined. RESULTS: To bridge the gap between our understanding of DNA repair and mutation distributions, we developed a novel method, AP-seq, capable of mapping apurinic sites and 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine bases at approximately 250-bp resolution on a genome-wide scale. We directly demonstrate that the accumulation rate of apurinic sites varies widely across the genome, with hot spots acquiring many times more damage than cold spots. Unlike single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in cancers, damage burden correlates with marks for open chromatin notably H3K9ac and H3K4me2. Apurinic sites and oxidative damage are also highly enriched in transposable elements and other repetitive sequences. In contrast, we observe a reduction at chromatin loop anchors with increased damage load towards inactive compartments. Less damage is found at promoters, exons, and termination sites, but not introns, in a seemingly transcription-independent but GC content-dependent manner. Leveraging cancer genomic data, we also find locally reduced SNV rates in promoters, coding sequence, and other functional elements. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals that oxidative DNA damage accumulation and repair differ strongly across the genome, but culminate in a previously unappreciated mechanism that safeguards the regulatory and coding regions of genes from mutations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bulk sequencing revealed that oxidative DNA damage hotspots are non-randomly distributed, preferring regulatory regions and heterochromatin.
“Sequencing technologies were developed to pinpoint the locations of oxidative DNA damage in bulk cell populations and revealed the damage hotspots are non-randomly distributed, which prefer regulatory regions and heterochromatin19–29.”
From Single-cell parallel analysis of DNA damage and transcriptome reveals selective genome vulnerability (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
The Abstract (Results) supports a non-random distribution of oxidative damage, with hotspots and cold spots. But the Results (‘Genomic features shape distribution of AP-sites and 8-oxoG,’ Figs. 2–3) report that damage correlates with euchromatic features, anticorrelates with heterochromatic ones, and is reduced at regulatory sites—the opposite of the claimed preference. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe salamander's large genome may have provided lines of defense for potentially harmful mutations, laying the foundation for the prevention of tumors.
“The salamander’s large genome may have provided lines of defense for potentially harmful mutations, such as regulators. This also laid the foundation for the prevention of tumors.315”
From Inflammation and aging: signaling pathways and intervention therapies (2023) · cites this paper as [315]
The Conclusions (page unavailable) say that patterns of oxidative DNA damage and repair safeguard regulatory and coding regions from mutations. The paper does not link that protection to salamanders, large genome size, or tumor prevention; those parts of the attributed claim are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredATAC-seq and non-targeting tagmentation control signals poorly correlate with both Paired-Damage-seq DNA and reference DNA damage profiles.
“On the other hand, the signals from ATAC-seq and non-targeting tagmentation control poorly correlated with both Paired-Damage-seq DNA and the refence DNA damage profiles21,43 (Extended Data Fig. 1g).”
From Single-cell parallel analysis of DNA damage and transcriptome reveals selective genome vulnerability (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
DNA damage are not randomly distributed and open chromatin regions are prone to be oxidized.
“Previously developed bulk sequencing methods19–29 revealed that DNA damage are not randomly distributed and open chromatin regions are prone to be oxidized.”
From Single-cell parallel analysis of DNA damage and transcriptome reveals selective genome vulnerability (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 97 · Cited by 132
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [92]Feuerbach L Sieverling L Deeg K Ginsbach P Hutter B Buchhalter I Northcott PA Lichter P Pfister SM Jones DTW Rippe K Brors B TelomereHunter: telomere content estimation and characterization from whole genome sequencing data bioRxiv 2016
- Authors
- Poetsch, A. R., Boulton, S. J., & Luscombe, N. M.
- Affiliations
- Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP)
- The Francis Crick Institute (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Poetsch, Anna R.
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 215-215
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-760X
- PMC
- PMC6284305
- OpenAlex
- W2951609967
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 3.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University
- Peter and Traudl Engelhorn Foundation
- Winton Charitable Foundation
- Wellcome Trust (103760/Z/14/Z, FC001110, FC001048)
- Medical Research Council (MR/L016311/1, FC001110, FC001048)
- Cancer Research UK (FC001110, FC001048)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Keywords
- oxidative DNA damage, DNA repair, mutagenesis, apurinic sites, 8-oxoguanine, chromatin accessibility, H3K9ac, H3K4me2, transposable elements, repetitive DNA, chromatin looping, GC content, single nucleotide variants, cancer mutations
- MeSH terms
- Apurinic Acid, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Guanine, Humans, Genome, Human, Mutagenesis, Oxidative Stress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review