Cited by 327

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Next-generation genome annotation: we still struggle to get it right

Salzberg, Steven L.·2019·Genome Biology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-019-1715-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Finding the genes in a genome is not a trivial task, especially in eukaryotic species in which most of the sequence is noncoding and the coding regions are separated by intronic sequences.

    “Finding the genes in a genome is not a trivial task, especially in eukaryotic species in which most of the sequence is noncoding and the coding regions are separated by intronic sequences (Salzberg 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Fleischmann RD, Adams MD, White O, Clayton RA, Kirkness EF, Kerlavage AR, et al. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science. 1995;269(5223):496–512. · DOI
  2. MGC Project Team, Temple G, Gerhard DS, Rasooly R, Feingold EA, Good PJ, et al. The completion of the mammalian gene collection (MGC). Genome Res. 2009;19:2324–33. · DOI
  3. Cantarel BL, Korf I, Robb SM, Parra G, Ross E, Moore B, et al. MAKER: an easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes. Genome Res. 2008;18:188–96. · DOI
  4. Frankish A, Diekhans M, Ferreira AM, Johnson R, Jungreis I, Loveland J, et al. GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D766–73. · DOI
  5. Koutsovoulos G, Kumar S, Laetsch DR, Stevens L, Daub J, Conlon C, et al. No evidence for extensive horizontal gene transfer in the genome of the tardigrade Hypsibius dujardini. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:5053–8. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Salzberg SL. Horizontal gene transfer is not a hallmark of the human genome. Genome Biol. 2017;18:85. · DOI
  7. Lu J, Salzberg SL. Removing contaminants from databases of draft genomes. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018;14:e1006277. · DOI
  8. Kryukov K, Imanishi T. Human contamination in public genome assemblies. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0162424. · DOI
  9. Workman RE, Tang AD, Tang PS, Jain M, Tyson JR, Zuzarte PC, et al. Nanopore native RNA sequencing of a human poly(a) transcriptome. bioRxiv; 2018. p. 459529. https://doi.org/10.1101/459529 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Salzberg, S. L.
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2019-05-16
Volume
20
Issue
1
ISSN
1474-760X
Cited by
327
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R35-GM130151)
  • National Science Foundation (IOS-1744309)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review