Cited by 135Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Knowledge-primed neural networks enable biologically interpretable deep learning on single-cell sequencing data

Open access
Fortelny, Nikolaus, Bock, Christoph·2020·Genome Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Deep learning has emerged as a versatile approach for predicting complex biological phenomena. However, its utility for biological discovery has so far been limited, given that generic deep neural networks provide little insight into the biological mechanisms that underlie a successful prediction. Here we demonstrate deep learning on biological networks, where every node has a molecular equivalent, such as a protein or gene, and every edge has a mechanistic interpretation, such as a regulatory interaction along a signaling pathway. Results: With knowledge-primed neural networks (KPNNs), we exploit the ability of deep learning algorithms to assign meaningful weights in multi-layered networks, resulting in a widely applicable approach for interpretable deep learning. We present a learning method that enhances the interpretability of trained KPNNs by stabilizing node weights in the presence of redundancy, enhancing the quantitative interpretability of node weights, and controlling for uneven connectivity in biological networks. We validate KPNNs on simulated data with known ground truth and demonstrate their practical use and utility in five biological applications with single-cell RNA-seq data for cancer and immune cells. Conclusions: We introduce KPNNs as a method that combines the predictive power of deep learning with the interpretability of biological networks. While demonstrated here on single-cell sequencing data, this method is broadly relevant to other research areas where prior domain knowledge can be represented as networks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-020-02100-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A combined LSTM and GNN model has been used to represent patient status sequences and temporal medical event graphs to predict future prescriptions or disease codes.

    “A combined LSTM and GNN model has also been used to represent patient status sequences and temporal medical event graphs, respectively, to predict future prescriptions or disease codes (Section 2.2) [208, 209].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [209]

  • Neural networks have been used to perform interpretable deep learning on biological networks to differentiate cell types and determine regulatory differences in single-cell RNA sequencing data.

    “Related work has used neural networks to perform interpretable deep learning on biological networks to differentiate cell types and determine regulatory differences in single cell RNA sequencing data (Fortelny and Bock, 2020).”

    From Mapping the multiscale structure of biological systems (2021) · cites this paper as Fortelny and Bock, 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 151 · Cited by 135

Authors
Fortelny, N., & Bock, C.
Affiliations
Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT)
Corresponding author
Bock, Christoph
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2020-08-03
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
190-190
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W3047163763
Cited by
135
References
151
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Austrian Science Fund (SFB F 6102-B21)
  • European Research Council (679146)
  • European Molecular Biology Organization (ALTF 241-2017)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
explainable deep learning, biological networks, single-cell RNA sequencing, network redundancy, signaling pathways, gene regulatory interactions, cancer cells, immune cells, domain knowledge integration
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Humans, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, Signal Transduction, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review