Cited by 194Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network Analysis

GCNG: graph convolutional networks for inferring gene interaction from spatial transcriptomics data

Open access
Yuan, Ye, Bar-Joseph, Ziv·2020·Genome Biology

Abstract

Most methods for inferring gene-gene interactions from expression data focus on intracellular interactions. The availability of high-throughput spatial expression data opens the door to methods that can infer such interactions both within and between cells. To achieve this, we developed Graph Convolutional Neural networks for Genes (GCNG). GCNG encodes the spatial information as a graph and combines it with expression data using supervised training. GCNG improves upon prior methods used to analyze spatial transcriptomics data and can propose novel pairs of extracellular interacting genes. The output of GCNG can also be used for downstream analysis including functional gene assignment. Supporting website with software and data: https://github.com/xiaoyeye/GCNG .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-020-02214-w

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gene expression data can be turned into a colored graph that captures the shape of the data, for example with TDA, enabling downstream analysis with network science metrics and graph machine learning.

    “Gene expression data can be transformed into a colored graph that captures the shape of the data (e.g., using TDA [148]; refer to SI Note 3), which then enables downstream analysis using network science metrics and graph machine learning.”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [148]

  • Methods that use only gene expression data typically transform the co-expression matrix into a more topologically meaningful form.

    “Methods that rely solely on gene expression data typically transform the co-expression matrix into a more topologically meaningful form [146, 147, 148].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [148]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 194

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [13]Bruna J, Zaremba W, Szlam A, LeCun Y. Spectral networks and locally connected networks on graphs. 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2014. 2014.
  2. [15]Zhou J, Cui G, Zhang Z, Yang C, Liu Z, Wang L, et al. Graph neural networks: a review of methods and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:08434. 2018.
  3. [18]Defferrard M, Bresson X, Vandergheynst P, editors. Convolutional neural networks on graphs with fast localized spectral filtering. Advances in neural information processing systems; 2016.
  4. [19]Kipf TN, Welling M. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:02907. 2016.

Authors
Yuan, Y., & Bar-Joseph, Z.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2020-12
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
300-300
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W3113349968
Cited by
194
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 3
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1R01GM122096)
  • NIH Office of the Director (OT2OD026682)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
gene-gene interaction, spatial transcriptomics, graph convolutional networks, spatial gene expression, intercellular communication
MeSH terms
Animals, Epistasis, Genetic, Humans, Ligands, Software, Gene Expression, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology, Mice, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review