Cited by 36Evolution and Genetic DynamicsPhilosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationLanguage and cultural evolution

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adaptive multiscapes: an up-to-date metaphor to visualize molecular adaptation

Open access
Catalán, Pablo, Arias, Clemente F., Cuesta, Jose A., Manrubia, Susanna·2017·Biology Direct

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wright's metaphor of the fitness landscape has shaped and conditioned our view of the adaptation of populations for almost a century. Since its inception, and including criticism raised by Wright himself, the concept has been surrounded by controversy. Among others, the debate stems from the intrinsic difficulty to capture important features of the space of genotypes, such as its high dimensionality or the existence of abundant ridges, in a visually appealing two-dimensional picture. Two additional currently widespread observations come to further constrain the applicability of the original metaphor: the very skewed distribution of phenotype sizes (which may actively prevent, due to entropic effects, the achievement of fitness maxima), and functional promiscuity (i.e. the existence of secondary functions which entail partial adaptation to environments never encountered before by the population). RESULTS: Here we revise some of the shortcomings of the fitness landscape metaphor and propose a new "scape" formed by interconnected layers, each layer containing the phenotypes viable in a given environment. Different phenotypes within a layer are accessible through mutations with selective value, while neutral mutations cause displacements of populations within a phenotype. A different environment is represented as a separated layer, where phenotypes may have new fitness values, other phenotypes may be viable, and the same genotype may yield a different phenotype, representing genotypic promiscuity. This scenario explicitly includes the many-to-many structure of the genotype-to-phenotype map. A number of empirical observations regarding the adaptation of populations in the light of adaptive multiscapes are reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Several shortcomings of Wright's visualization of fitness landscapes can be overcome through adaptive multiscapes. Relevant aspects of population adaptation, such as neutral drift, functional promiscuity or environment-dependent fitness, as well as entropic trapping and the concomitant impossibility to reach fitness peaks are visualized at once. Adaptive multiscapes should aid in the qualitative understanding of the multiple pathways involved in evolutionary dynamics. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Eugene Koonin and Ricard Solé.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13062-017-0178-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shape spaces share a remarkable universal pattern of organization, including neutrality, characterized by flat regions where different genotypes have the same fitness.

    “They all share a remarkable universal pattern of organization, including neutrality, characterized by flat regions where different genotypes have the same fitness [29] (see also Catalán et al. [218]).”

    From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [218]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 75

  1. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics. 1931; 16:97–159. · DOI
  2. Pigliucci M. Sewall Wright’s adaptive landscapes: 1932 vs. 1988. Biol Philos. 2008; 23:591–603. · DOI
  3. Svensson EI, Calsbeek R. The Adaptive Landscape in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
  4. Wright S. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proc 6 t h Int Congr Genet. 1932; 1:356–66.
  5. Mustonen V, Lässig M. From fitness landscapes to seascapes: non-equilibrium dynamics of selection and adaptation. Trends Genet. 2009; 25:111–9. · DOI
  6. Gavrilets S. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2004. · DOI
  7. Pigliucci M. Landscapes, surfaces, and morphospaces: what are they good for? In: Svensson E, Calsbeek R, (eds.), editors. The Adaptive Landscape in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 2012. p. 26–38. Chap. 3. · DOI
  8. Smith JM. Natural selection and the concept of a protein space. Nature. 1970; 225:563–4. · DOI
  9. Huynen MA, Stadler PF, Fontana W. Smoothness within ruggedness: The role of neutrality in adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996; 93:397–401. · DOI
  10. Bastolla U, Porto M, Roman HE, Vendruscolo M. Connectivity of neutral networks, overdispersion, and structural conservation in protein evolution. J Mol Evol. 2003; 56:243–54. · DOI
  11. Ciliberti S, Martin OC, Wagner A. Innovation and robustness in complex regulatory gene networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007; 104:13591–6. · DOI
  12. Rodrigues JFM, Wagner A. Genotype networks, innovation, and robustness in sulfur metabolism. BMC Syst Biol. 2011; 5:39. · DOI
  13. Schultes EA, Bartel DP. One sequence, two ribozymes: implications for the emergence of new ribozyme folds. Science. 2000; 289:448–52. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Bloom JD, Romero PA, Lu Z, Arnold FH. Neutral genetic drift can alter promiscuous protein functions, potentially aiding functional evolution. Biol Dir. 2007; 2:17. · DOI
  15. Koelle K, Cobey S, Grenfell B, Pascual M. Epochal evolution shapes the phylodynamics of interpandemic influenza A (H3N2) in humans. Science. 2006; 314:1898–903. · DOI
  16. Gavrilets S. Evolution and speciation on holey adaptive landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol. 1997; 12:307–12. · DOI
  17. Kaplan J. The end of the adaptive landscape metaphor?Biol Philos. 2008; 23:625–38. · DOI
  18. Gould SJ, Vrba ES. Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology. 1982; 8:4–15. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Gavrilets S, Gravner J. Percolation on the fitness hypercube and the evolution of reproductive isolation. J Theor Biol. 1997; 184:51–64. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Huynen MA. Exploring phenotype space through neutral evolution. J Mol Evol. 1996; 43:165–9. · DOI
  21. Babajide A, Hofacker IL, Sippl MJ, Stadler PF. Neutral networks in protein space: a computational study based on knowledge-based potentials of mean force. Fold Des. 1997; 2:261–9. · DOI
  22. Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD. The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nat Revs Genet. 2007; 8:610–8. · DOI
  23. Grüner W, Giegerich R, Strothmann D, Reidys C, Weber J, Hofacker IL, Stadler PF, Schuster P. Analysis of RNA sequence structure maps by exhaustive enumeration. I. Neutral networks. Monatsh Chem. 1996; 127:355–74. · DOI
  24. Cowperthwaite MC, Economo EP, Harcombe WR, Miller EL, Meyers LA. The ascent of the abundant: How mutational networks constrain evolution. PLoS Comp Biol. 2008; 4:1000110. · DOI
  25. Dingle K, Schaper S, Louis AA. The structure of the genotype-phenotype map strongly constrains the evolution of non-coding RNA. J R Soc Interf Focus. 2015; 5:20150053. · DOI
  26. Irbäck A, Troein C. Enumerating designing sequences in the HP model. J Biol Phys. 2002; 28:1–15. · DOI
  27. Holzgräfe C, Irbäck A, Troein C. Mutation-induced forld switching among lattice proteins. J Chem Phys. 2011; 135:195101. · DOI
  28. Jörg T, Martin OC, Wagner A. Neutral network sizes of biological RNA molecules can be computed and are not atypically small. BMC Bioinforma. 2008; 9:464. · DOI
  29. Stich M, Briones C, Manrubia SC. On the structural repertoire of pools of short, random RNA sequences. J Theor Biol. 2008; 252:750–63. · DOI
  30. Schuster P, Fontana W, Stadler PF, Hofacker IL. From sequences to shapes and back: a case study in RNA secondary structures. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1994; 255:279–84. · DOI
  31. Aguirre J, Buldú JM, Stich M, Manrubia SC. Topological structure of the space of phenotypes: The case of RNA secondary structure. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6:26324. · DOI
  32. Greenbury SF, Ahnert SE. The organization of biological sequences into constrained and unconstrained parts determines fundamental properties of genotype–phenotype maps. J Royal Soc Interface. 2015; 12:20150724. · DOI
  33. Wilke CO, Wang JL, Ofria C, Lenski RE, Adami C. Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flattest. Nature. 2001; 412:331–3. · DOI
  34. Codoñer FM, Darós JA, Solé RV, Elena SF. The fittest versus the flattest: Experimental confirmation of the quasispecies effect with subviral pathogens. PLoS Path. 2006; 2:136. · DOI
  35. Bornberg-Bauer E. How are model protein structures distributed in sequence space?. Biophys J. 1997; 73:2393–403. · DOI
  36. Johnston IG, Ahnert SE, Doye JPK, Louis AA. Evolutionary dynamics in a simple model of self-assembly. Phys Rev E. 2011; 83:066105. · DOI
  37. Wagner A. The Origins of Evolutionary Innovations. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. · DOI
  38. Lynch M. The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007; 104:8597–604. · DOI
  39. Fontana W, Schuster P. Continuity in evolution: On the nature of transitions. Science. 1998; 280:1451–5. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Fontana W, Schuster P. Shaping space: the possible and the attainable in RNA genotype-phenotype mapping. J Theor Biol. 1998; 194:491–515. · DOI
  41. Fontana W. Modelling ’evo-devo’ with RNA. BioEssays. 2002; 24:1164–77. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Schaper S, Louis AA. The arrival of the frequent: How bias in genotype-phenotype maps can steer populations to local optima. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9:86635. · DOI
  43. McCaskill J. The equilibrium partition function and base pair binding probabilities for RNA secondary structure. Biopolymers. 1990; 29:1105–19. · DOI
  44. García-Martín JA, Bayegan AH, Dotu I, Clote P. Rnadualpf: software to compute the dual partition function with sample applications in molecular evolution theory. BMC Bioinforma. 2016; 17:424. · DOI
  45. Reidys C, Stadler PF, Schuster P. Generic properties of combinatory maps: neutral networks of RNA secondary structures. Bull Math Biol. 1997; 59:339–97. · DOI
  46. Manzourolajdad A, Arnold J. Secondary structural entropy in RNA switch (riboswitch) identification. BMC Bioinforma. 2015; 16:133. · DOI
  47. Vaidya N, Lehman N. One RNA plays three roles to provide catalytic activity to a group I intron lacking an endogenous internal guide sequence. Nucl Acids Res. 2009; 37:3981–9. · DOI
  48. Piatigorsky J. Gene Sharing and Evolution: the Diversity of Protein Functions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2007. · DOI
  49. Wistow G, Piatigorsky J. Recruitment of enzymes as lens structural proteins. Science. 1987; 236:1554–6. · DOI
  50. Jensen RA. Enzyme recruitment in evolution of new function. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1976; 30:409–25. · DOI
  51. Aharoni A, Gaidukov L, Khersonsky O, Gould SM, Roodveldt C, Tawfik DS. The “evolvability” of promiscuous protein functions. Nat Gen. 2005; 37:73. · DOI
  52. Barve A, Wagner A. A latent capacity for evolutionary innovation through exaptation in metabolic systems. Nature. 2013; 500:203–8. · DOI
  53. Arias CF, Catalán P, Manrubia S, Cuesta JA. toyLIFE: a computational framework to study the multi-level organization of the genotype-phenotype map. Sci Rep. 2014; 4:7549. · DOI
  54. Amitai G, Gupta RD, Tawfik DS. Latent evolutionary potentials under the neutral mutational drift of an enzyme. HFSP J. 2007; 1:67–78. · DOI
  55. Aguirre J, Buldú JM, Manrubia SC. Evolutionary dynamics on networks of selectively neutral genotypes: Effects of topology and sequence stability. Phys Rev E. 2009; 80:066112. · DOI
  56. Wagner A. Robustness and evolvability: A paradox resolved. Proc Roy Soc Lond B. 2008; 275:91–100. · DOI · Paper page
  57. Manrubia S, Cuesta JA. Evolution on neutral networks accelerates the ticking rate of the molecular clock. J R Soc Interf. 2015; 12:20141010. · DOI
  58. Duarte EA, Novella IS, Ledesma S, Clarke DK, Moya A, Elena SF, Domingo E, Holland JJ. Subclonal components of consensus fitness in an RNA virus clone. J Virol. 1994; 68:4295–301. · DOI
  59. Manrubia S, Lázaro E, Pérez-Mercader J, Escarmís C, Domingo E. Fitness distribution in exponentially growing asexual populations. Phys Rev Lett. 2003; 90:188102. · DOI
  60. Lafforgue G, Martínez F, Sardanyés J, de la Iglesia F, Niu QW, Lin SS, Solé RV, Chua NH, Daròs JA, Elena SF. Tempo and mode of plant RNA Virus Escape from RNA interference-mediated resistance. J Virol. 2011; 85:9686. · DOI
  61. Coffin JM. HIV population dynamics in vivo: implications for genetic variation, pathogenesis, and therapy. Science. 1995; 267:483–9. · DOI
  62. Alexander HK, Bonhoeffer S. Pre-existence and emergence of drug resistance in a generalized model of intra-host viral dynamics. Epidemics. 2012; 4:187–202. · DOI
  63. Innan H, Kondrashov F. The evolution of gene duplications: classifying and distinguishing between models. Nat Rev Genet. 2010; 11:97–108. · DOI
  64. Waddington CH. Genetic assimilation of an acquired character. Evolution. 1953; 7:118–26. · DOI
  65. Waddington CH. Genetic assimilation of the bithorax phenotype. Evolution. 1956; 10:1–13. · DOI
  66. Schenk MF, Szendro IG, Salverda MLM, Krug J, de Visser JAGM. Patterns of epistasis between beneficial mutations in an antibiotic resistance gene. Mol Biol Evol. 2013; 30:1779–87. · DOI
  67. Ancel LW, Fontana W. Plasticity, evolvability, and modularity in rna. J Exp Zool. 2000; 288:242–83. · DOI
  68. Borenstein E, Meilijson I, Ruppin E. The effect of phenotypic plasticity on evolution in multipeaked fitness landscapes. J Evol Biol. 2006; 19:1555–70. · DOI
  69. Kin T, Yamada K, Terai G, Okida H, Yoshinari Y, Ono Y, Kojima A, Kimura Y, Komori T, et al. fRNAdb: a platform for mining/annotating functional RNA candidates from non-coding RNA sequences. Nuc Acids Res. 2007; 35:145–8. · DOI
  70. Bloom JD, Arnold FH. In the light of directed evolution: Pathways of adaptive protein evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106:9995–10000. · DOI
  71. Salverda MLM, Dellus E, Gorter FA, Debets AJM, van der Oost J, Hoekstra RF, Tawfik DS, de Visser JAGM. Initial mutations direct alternative pathways of protein evolution. PLoS Genet. 2011; 7:1001321. · DOI
  72. Cabanillas L, Arribas M, Lázaro E. Evolution at increased error rate leads to the coexistence of multiple adaptive pathways in an rna virus. BMC Evol Biol. 2013; 13:11. · DOI
  73. Lobkovsky AE, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. Predictability of evolutionary trajectories in fitness landscapes. PLoS Comp Biol. 2011; 7:1002302. · DOI
  74. Lobkovsky AE, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. Quantifying the similarity of monotonic trajectories in rough and smooth fitness landscapes. Mol Biosyst. 2013; 9:1627. · DOI
  75. Aguirre J, Manrubia S. Tipping points and early warning signals in the genomic composition of populations induced by environmental changes. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:9664. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Catalán, P., Arias, C. F., Cuesta, J. A., & Manrubia, S.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Corresponding author
Manrubia, Susanna
Venue
Biology Direct
Published
2017-02-28
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
7-7
ISSN
1745-6150 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2594151757
Cited by
36
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Biology Direct (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-Archivo (Carlos III University of Madrid) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (FIS2014-057686-P, FIS2015-64349-P)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
Keywords
fitness landscape, molecular adaptation, genotype-phenotype mapping, neutral drift, entropic trapping, fitness peaks, evolutionary dynamics, neutral mutations
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Biological, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Phenotype, Population Dynamics, Selection, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review