Cited by 20Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Improving pain treatment with a smartphone app: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Suso-Ribera, Carlos, Mesas, Ángela, Medel, Javier, Server, Anna, Márquez, Esther, Castilla, Diana, Zaragozá, Irene, García-Palacios, Azucena·2018·Trials

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain has become a major health problem across the world, especially in older adults. Unfortunately, the effectiveness of medical interventions is modest. Some have argued that assessment strategies should be improved if the impact of medical interventions is to be improved. Ecological momentary assessment using smartphones is now considered the gold standard in monitoring in health settings, including chronic pain. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no randomized controlled trial to show that telemonitoring using a smartphone app can indeed improve the effectiveness of medical treatments in adults with chronic pain. The goal of this study will be to explore the effects of using a smartphone app for telemonitoring adults with chronic pain. METHODS: The study will be a randomized controlled trial with three groups: treatment as usual (TAU), TAU+app, and TAU+app+alarms. All groups will receive the adequate treatment for their pain, which will be prescribed the first day of study according to clinical guidelines. Assessment in the TAU group will be the usual at the Pain Clinic, that is, a paper-and-pencil evaluation at the onset of treatment (beginning of study) and at follow up (end of study, 30 days later). The other two groups (TAU+app and TAU+app+alarms) will be assessed daily using Pain Monitor, a smartphone app developed by our multidisciplinary team. Telemonitoring will only be made in the TAU+app+alarms group. For this group, physicians at the Pain Clinic may decide to adjust pain treatment in response to alarms. Telemonitoring is not the usual practice at the Pain Clinic and will not occur in the other two groups (TAU and TAU+app), so no changes in treatment are expected in these groups after the first appointment. The total sample size will be 150, with 50 patients in each group. The assessment protocol will be the same in all groups and will include pain intensity and side effects of the medication (primary outcomes), together with several pain-related variables like pain interference, activity level, use of rescue medication, pain catastrophizing, and pain acceptance, among others. DISCUSSION: We believe that the present trial has important clinical implications. We think that telemonitoring using ecological momentary assessment is crucial to improve current interventions for pain. The armamentarium of available treatments for pain is large, so physicians can turn to different treatments or dosages in the presence of an undesired event. The use of the app for telemonitoring can allow for this rapid detection of unwanted events, thus improving patient safety (i.e., withdrawal of treatment causing side effects) and augmenting treatment effectiveness (i.e., changing an ineffective treatment or dosage). In a time when smartphones are a mainstream technology, we should take advantage of them in the promotion of health care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03247725 . Registered on 25 July 2017.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13063-018-2539-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 20

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Neuropathic pain in adults: pharmacological management in non-specialist settings. NICE Clin Guidelines. 2013; https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg173. Accessed 15 Jan 2018. 31961628

Authors
Suso-Ribera, C., Mesas, Á., Medel, J., Server, A., Márquez, E., Castilla, D., Zaragozá, I., & García-Palacios, A.
Affiliations
  • Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
  • Universitat Jaume I (ES)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
Venue
Trials
Published
2018-02-27
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
145-145
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2798100295
Cited by
20
References
58
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Zaguan (University of Zaragoza Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Universitat Jaume I (POSDOC/2016/15, UJI-B2016-39)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
chronic pain, mobile application, remote patient monitoring, ecological momentary assessment, pain intensity, adverse drug reactions, pain catastrophizing, pain acceptance, pain interference, rescue medication, treatment modification, patient safety, older adults, pain clinic, mobile health, medication adherence, activity level, pain-related hopelessness, pain-related helplessness
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Humans, Pain Measurement, Spain, Time Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Chronic Pain, Pain Management, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review