Cited by 19Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Do mobile phone-based reminders and conditional financial transfers improve the timeliness of childhood vaccinations in Tanzania? Study protocol for a quasi-randomized controlled trial

Open access
Ostermann, Jan, Vasudevan, Lavanya, Baumgartner, Joy Noel, Ngadaya, Esther, Mfinanga, Sayoki Godfrey·2019·Trials

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vaccination is a cost-effective strategy for reducing morbidity and mortality among children under 5 years old. To be fully protected from diseases such as tuberculosis, diphtheria, pertussis, and polio, children must receive all recommended vaccinations in a timely manner. In many countries, including Tanzania, high overall vaccination rates mask substantial regional variation in vaccination coverage and low rates of vaccination timeliness. This study evaluates the efficacy of mobile phone-based (mHealth) reminders and incentives for improving vaccination timeliness in the first year of life. METHODS: The study, conducted in Mtwara Region in Tanzania, includes 400 late-stage pregnant women enrolled from rural and urban health facilities and surrounding communities. The primary outcome is timeliness of vaccinations among their children at 6, 10, and 14 weeks after birth. Timeliness is defined as vaccination receipt within 28 days after the vaccination due date. The quasi-randomized controlled trial includes three arms: (1) standard of care (no reminders or incentives), (2) mobile phone-based reminders, and (3) mobile phone-based reminders and incentives in the form of conditional financial transfers. Assignment into study arms is based on scheduled vaccination dates. Reminder messages are sent to arms 2 and 3 participants via mobile phones 1 week and 1 day prior to each scheduled vaccination. For arm 3 participants, reminder messages offer an incentive that is provided in the form of a mobile phone airtime recharge voucher code for each timely vaccination. Vaccination dates are recorded via participant contact with an mHealth system, phone calls with mothers, and a review of government-issued vaccination cards during an end-line survey. Random effects logistic regression models will be used to estimate the effects of reminders and incentives on the timeliness of vaccinations. DISCUSSION: The results will inform implementation science research on the effectiveness of reminders and incentives as a means of improving vaccination timeliness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03252288 . Registered on 17 August 2017 (retrospectively registered).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13063-019-3430-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 19

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [36]Fox K Adolescent consent to HIV testing: a review of current policies and issues in sub-Saharan Africa. In: HIV and adolescents: guidance for HIV testing and counselling and care for adolescents living with HIV 2013 Geneva World Health Organization

Authors
Ostermann, J., Vasudevan, L., Baumgartner, J. N., Ngadaya, E., & Mfinanga, S. G.
Affiliations
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • National Institute for Medical Research (TZ)
Corresponding author
Vasudevan, Lavanya
Venue
Trials
Published
2019-07-04
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
397-397
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2953539248
Cited by
19
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Fogarty International Center (1R21TW010261)
  • Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University (Maternal, Adolescent and Child Health (MACH) pilot grant)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (1KL2TR002554)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
childhood immunization, vaccination timeliness, conditional cash transfers, incentives, mobile health, pregnant women, maternal health, vaccination coverage, Mtwara region
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Female, Humans, Immunization Schedule, Infant, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mothers, Motivation, Tanzania, Time Factors, Token Economy, Vaccination, Reminder Systems, Telemedicine, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review