Cited by 12Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationElectronic Health Records SystemsMusculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation

SupportPrim—a computerized clinical decision support system for stratified care for patients with musculoskeletal pain complaints in general practice: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Lervik, Lars Christian Naterstad, Vasseljen, Ottar, Austad, Bjarne, Bach, Kerstin, Bones, Anita Formo, Granviken, Fredrik, Hill, Jonathan C., Jørgensen, Pål +4 more·2023·Trials

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal disorders represented 149 million years lived with disability world-wide in 2019 and are the main cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Current treatment recommendations are based on “one-size fits all” principle, which does not take into account the large degree of biopsychosocial heterogeneity in this group of patients. To compensate for this, we developed a stratified care computerized clinical decision support system for general practice based on patient biopsychosocial phenotypes; furthermore, we added personalized treatment recommendations based on specific patient factors to the system. In this study protocol, we describe the randomized controlled trial for evaluating the effectiveness of computerized clinical decision support system for stratified care for patients with common musculoskeletal pain complaints in general practice. The aim of this study is to test the effect of a computerized clinical decision support system for stratified care in general practice on subjective patient outcome variables compared to current care. Methods: We will perform a cluster-randomized controlled trial with 44 general practitioners including 748 patients seeking their general practitioner due to pain in the neck, back, shoulder, hip, knee, or multisite. The intervention group will use the computerized clinical decision support system, while the control group will provide current care for their patients. The primary outcomes assessed at 3 months are global perceived effect and clinically important improvement in function measured by the Patient-Specific Function Scale (PSFS), while secondary outcomes include change in pain intensity measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (0–10), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D), general musculoskeletal health (MSK-HQ), number of treatments, use of painkillers, sick-leave grading and duration, referral to secondary care, and use of imaging. Discussion: The use of biopsychosocial profile to stratify patients and implement it in a computerized clinical decision support system for general practitioners is a novel method of providing decision support for this patient group. The study aim to recruit patients from May 2022 to March 2023, and the first results from the study will be available late 2023. Trial registration: The trial is registered in ISRCTN 11th of May 2022: 14,067,965.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13063-023-07272-6

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

9 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lervik, L. C. N., Vasseljen, O., Austad, B., Bach, K., Bones, A. F., Granviken, F., Hill, J. C., Jørgensen, P., Øien, T., Veites, P. M., Van der Windt, D. A., & Meisingset, I.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Arthritis UK (GB)
Corresponding author
Lervik, Lars Christian Naterstad
Venue
Trials
Published
2023-04-11
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
267-267
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4364359195
Cited by
12
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Keele Research Repository (Keele University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Norges Forskningsråd (ref 303331)
  • NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
Keywords
computerized clinical decision support systems, stratified care, musculoskeletal pain, general practice, personalized treatment recommendations, neck and back pain, shoulder pain, health-related quality of life, sick leave, secondary care referral, analgesics
MeSH terms
Humans, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, General Practitioners, General Practice, Musculoskeletal Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review