The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The introduction of renewable jet fuel (RJF) is considered an important emission mitigation measure for the aviation industry. This study compares the well-to-wake (WtWa) greenhouse gas (GHG) emission performance of multiple RJF conversion pathways and explores the impact of different co-product allocation methods. The insights obtained in this study are of particular importance if RJF is included as an emission mitigation instrument in the global Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). RESULTS: Fischer-Tropsch pathways yield the highest GHG emission reduction compared to fossil jet fuel (86-104%) of the pathways in scope, followed by Hydrothermal Liquefaction (77-80%) and sugarcane- (71-75%) and corn stover-based Alcohol-to-Jet (60-75%). Feedstock cultivation, hydrogen and conversion inputs were shown to be major contributors to the overall WtWa GHG emission performance. The choice of allocation method mainly affects pathways yielding high shares of co-products or producing co-products which effectively displace carbon intensive products (e.g., electricity). CONCLUSIONS: Renewable jet fuel can contribute to significant reduction of aviation-related GHG emissions, provided the right feedstock and conversion technology are used. The GHG emission performance of RJF may be further improved by using sustainable hydrogen sources or applying carbon capture and storage. Based on the character and impact of different co-product allocation methods, we recommend using energy and economic allocation (for non-energy co-products) at a global level, as it leverages the universal character of energy allocation while adequately valuing non-energy co-products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, M., Han, J., Dunn, J. B., Cai, H., & Elgowainy, A. (2012) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/045905 · Cited by 536
Self-citationChemical, thermal stability, seal swell, and emissions studies of alternative jet fuels
Corporan, E., Edwards, T., Shafer, L., DeWitt, M. J., Klingshirn, C., Zabarnick, S., West, Z., Striebich, R., Graham, J., & Klein, J. (2011) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef101520v · Cited by 315
de Jong, S., Hoefnagels, R., Faaij, A., Slade, R., Mawhood, R., & Junginger, M. (2015) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1613 · Cited by 294
Self-citationMawhood, R., Gazis, E., de Jong, S., Hoefnagels, R., & Slade, R. (2016) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1644 · Cited by 229
Self-citationAtsonios, K., Kougioumtzis, M.-A., D. Panopoulos, K., & Kakaras, E. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.056 · Cited by 198
Life Cycle Assessment of Potential Biojet Fuel Production in the United States
Agusdinata, D. B., Zhao, F., Ileleji, K., & DeLaurentis, D. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es202148g · Cited by 184
Life-cycle analysis of bio-based aviation fuels
Han, J., Elgowainy, A., Cai, H., & Wang, M. Q. (2013) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.153 · Cited by 175
Self-citationLand-use change and greenhouse gas emissions from corn and cellulosic ethanol
Dunn, J. B., Mueller, S., Kwon, H.-Y., & Wang, M. Q. (2013) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/1754-6834-6-51 · Cited by 167
Self-citationStaples, M. D., Malina, R., Olcay, H., Pearlson, M. N., Hileman, J. I., Boies, A., & Barrett, S. R. H. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee43655a · Cited by 119
Cited by
Renewable bio-jet fuel production for aviation: a review
Wei, H., Liu, W., Chen, X., Yang, Q., Li, J., & Chen, H. (2019) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2019.06.007 · Cited by 435
Kargbo, H., Harris, J. S., & Phan, A. N. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110168 · Cited by 333
Progress in utilisation of waste cooking oil for sustainable biodiesel and biojet fuel production
Goh, B. H. H., Chong, C. T., Ge, Y., Ong, H. C., Ng, J.-H., Tian, B., Ashokkumar, V., Lim, S., Seljak, T., & Józsa, V. (2020) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113296 · Cited by 311
Bio-aviation Fuel: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of the Supply Chain Components
Doliente, S. S., Narayan, A., Tapia, J. F. D., Samsatli, N. J., Zhao, Y., & Samsatli, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.00110 · Cited by 295
“Using a variety of modes of transport was found to decrease the cost of transporting fuel over longer distances, thereby allowing facilities to take advantage of cheaper feedstock sources from further away (de Jong et al., 2017b).”
BackgroundInfluentialSustainable aviation fuel technologies, costs, emissions, policies, and markets: A critical review
Watson, M. J., Machado, P. G., da Silva, A. V., Saltar, Y., Ribeiro, C. O., Nascimento, C. A. O., & Dowling, A. W. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141472 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- de Jong, S., Antonissen, K., Hoefnagels, R., Lonza, L., Wang, M., Faaij, A., & Junginger, M.
- Venue
- Biotechnology for Biofuels
- Published
- 2017-03-14
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-64
- ISSN
- 1754-6834 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2596998468
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 13.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13068-017-0739-7
- The paper
- de Jong, S., Antonissen, K., Hoefnagels, R., Lonza, L., Wang, M., Faaij, A., & Junginger, M. (2017). Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production. Biotechnology for Biofuels. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0739-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
