The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visualizing chemical functionality in plant cell walls
Open accessAbstract
Understanding plant cell wall cross-linking chemistry and polymeric architecture is key to the efficient utilization of biomass in all prospects from rational genetic modification to downstream chemical and biological conversion to produce fuels and value chemicals. In fact, the bulk properties of cell wall recalcitrance are collectively determined by its chemical features over a wide range of length scales from tissue, cellular to polymeric architectures. Microscopic visualization of cell walls from the nanometer to the micrometer scale offers an in situ approach to study their chemical functionality considering its spatial and chemical complexity, particularly the capabilities of characterizing biomass non-destructively and in real-time during conversion processes. Microscopic characterization has revealed heterogeneity in the distribution of chemical features, which would otherwise be hidden in bulk analysis. Key microscopic features include cell wall type, wall layering, and wall composition-especially cellulose and lignin distributions. Microscopic tools, such as atomic force microscopy, stimulated Raman scattering microscopy, and fluorescence microscopy, have been applied to investigations of cell wall structure and chemistry from the native wall to wall treated by thermal chemical pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. While advancing our current understanding of plant cell wall recalcitrance and deconstruction, microscopic tools with improved spatial resolution will steadily enhance our fundamental understanding of cell wall function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
MOSIER, N. (2005) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025 · Cited by 6,251
Miscanthus: European experience with a novel energy crop
Lewandowski, I., Clifton-Brown, J. C., Scurlock, J. M. O., & Huisman, W. (2000) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/s0961-9534(00)00032-5 · Cited by 988
Albersheim, P., Darvill, A., Roberts, K., Sederoff, R., & Staehelin, A. (2010) · doi:10.1201/9780203833476 · Cited by 252
Cited by
Nanoparticle-Based Sustainable Agriculture and Food Science: Recent Advances and Future Outlook
Mittal, D., Kaur, G., Singh, P., Yadav, K., & Ali, S. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Nanotechnology · doi:10.3389/fnano.2020.579954 · Cited by 788
Jagadeesh, P., Puttegowda, M., Mavinkere Rangappa, S., & Siengchin, S. (2021) · Polymer Composites · doi:10.1002/pc.26312 · Cited by 281
Characterizing variability in lignocellulosic biomass: a review
Yan, J., Oyedeji, O., Leal, J. H., Donohoe, B. S., Semelsberger, T. A., Li, C., Hoover, A. N., Webb, E., Bose, E. A., Zeng, Y., et al. (2020) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06263 · Cited by 134
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeng, Y., Himmel, M. E., & Ding, S.-Y.
- Venue
- Biotechnology for Biofuels
- Published
- 2017-11-30
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 263-263
- ISSN
- 1754-6834 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2767305608
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visualizing chemical functionality in plant cell walls. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13068-017-0953-3
- The paper
- Zeng, Y., Himmel, M. E., & Ding, S.-Y. (2017). Visualizing chemical functionality in plant cell walls. Biotechnology for Biofuels. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0953-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.