Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 503

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 292 of the 292 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review on commercial-scale high-value products that can be produced alongside cellulosic ethanol

Open access
Rosales-Calderon, Oscar, Arantes, Valdeir·2019·Biotechnology for Biofuels
DOI 10.1186/s13068-019-1529-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The demand for fossil derivate fuels and chemicals has increased, augmenting concerns on climate change, global economic stability, and sustainability on fossil resources. Therefore, the production of fuels and chemicals from alternative and renewable resources has attracted considerable and growing attention. Ethanol is a promising biofuel that can reduce the consumption of gasoline in the transportation sector and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Lignocellulosic biomass is a promising feedstock to produce bioethanol (cellulosic ethanol) because of its abundance and low cost. Since the conversion of lignocellulose to ethanol is complex and expensive, the cellulosic ethanol price cannot compete with those of the fossil derivate fuels. A promising strategy to lower the production cost of cellulosic ethanol is developing a biorefinery which produces ethanol and other high-value chemicals from lignocellulose. The selection of such chemicals is difficult because there are hundreds of products that can be produced from lignocellulose. Multiple reviews and reports have described a small group of lignocellulose derivate compounds that have the potential to be commercialized. Some of these products are in the bench scale and require extensive research and time before they can be industrially produced. This review examines chemicals and materials with a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of at least 8, which have reached a commercial scale and could be shortly or immediately integrated into a cellulosic ethanol process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13068-019-1529-1

Cites

292 of 292 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 292 references

Research works printed but not linked: 128

  1. Zhang Y. The links between the price of oil and the value of us dollar. Int J Energy Econ Policy. 2013;3:341–51.
  2. Zhai R, Hu J, Saddler JN. What are the major components in steam pretreated lignocellulosic biomass that inhibit the efficacy of cellulase enzyme mixtures? ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2016;4:3429–36. · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00481
  3. Beta Renewables PROESA. Industrial experience in Second generation ethanol production. Budapest: Glob Bioenergy Partnersh; 2016.
  4. Scott A. Clariant bets big on cellulosic ethanol. Chem Eng News. 2018;96:4–7.
  5. Carole J. Raizen has lowest price as cellulosic ethanol hinges on feedstock cost. 2016. http://www.luxresearchinc.com/news-and-events/press-releases/read/raizen-has-lowest-price-cellulosic-ethanol-hinges-feedstock-cost . Accessed 25 Jan 2017.
  6. Sapp M. Poet-DSM to host Poet Liberty grand opening on Sept. 3. 2014. http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/bdigest/2014/08/14/poet-dsm-to-host-poet-liberty-grand-opening-on-sept-3/ . Accessed 17 Nov 2017. · doi:10.1016/j.focat.2017.03.017
  7. da Silva HJT, Pedro VM. Evolution of production costs in Brazilian sugar-energy sector. China-USA Bus Rev. 2017;16(3):93–107. https://doi.org/10.17265/1537-1514/2017.03.001 . · doi:10.17265/1537-1514/2017.03.001
  8. Laxman RS, Lachke AH. Bioethanol lignocellulosic biomass. In: Handbook plant-based biofuels; 2009. p. 121–39. · doi:10.1201/9780789038746.ch9
  9. Rosales-Calderon O, Trajano HL, Posarac D, Duff SJB. Modeling of oxygen delignified wheat straw enzymatic hydrolysis as a function of hydrolysis time, enzyme concentration, and lignin content. Ind Biotechnol. 2016;12:176–86. · doi:10.1089/ind.2015.0037
  10. Schwietzke S, Ladisch M, Russo L, Kwant K. Gaps in the research of 2nd Generation transportation biofuels, vol. 41. Golden; 2008.
  11. Tu M, Pan X, Saddler JN. Adsorption of cellulase on cellulolytic enzyme lignin from lodgepole pine. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57:7771–8. · doi:10.1021/jf901031m
  12. Chin DWK, Lim S, Pang YL, Leong LK, Lim CH. Investigation of organosolv pretreatment to natural microbial-degraded empty fruit bunch for sugar based substrate recovery. Energy Procedia. 2019;158:1065–71. · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.258
  13. van Wyk JPH, Mohulatsi M. Biodegradation of wastepaper by cellulase from Trichoderma viride. Bioresour Technol. 2003;86:21–3. · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(02)00130-x
  14. Castellanos OFF, Sinitsyn APP, Yu Vlasenko E, Vlasenko EY. Evaluation of hydrolysis conditions of cellulosic materials by Penicillium cellulase. Bioresour Technol. 1995;52:109–17. · doi:10.1016/0960-8524(95)00010-c
  15. Skomarovsky AA, Markov AV, Gusakov AV, Kondrateva EG, Okunev ON, Bekkarevich AO, et al. New cellulases efficiently hydrolyzing lignocellulose pulp. Appl Biochem Microbiol Matys. 2006;42:592–7. · doi:10.1134/s0003683806060093
  16. Hu J, Arantes V, Pribowo A, Saddler JN. The synergistic action of accessory enzymes enhances the hydrolytic potential of a “cellulase mixture” but is highly substrate specific. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:112–24. · doi:10.1186/1754-6834-6-112
  17. Johan K, Jozsef MFT. Hydrolysis of steam-pretreated lignocellulose. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1999;82:243–58. · doi:10.1385/abab:82:3:243
  18. Martín C, Marcet M, Thomsen AB. Comparison between wet oxidation and steam explosion as pretreatment methods for enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. BioResources. 2008;3:670–83. · doi:10.15376/biores.3.3.670-683
  19. Pribowo A, Arantes V, Saddler JN. The adsorption and enzyme activity profiles of specific Trichoderma reesei. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2012;50:195–203. · doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2011.12.004
  20. Djioleu AC, Arora A, Martin EM, Smith JA, Pelkki MH, Carrier DJ. Sugar recovery from the pretreatment/enzymatic hydrolysis of high and low specific gravity poplar clones. Agric Food Anal Bacteriol. 2012;2:121–31.
  21. Ruffell J, Levie B, Helle S, Duff S. Pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of recovered fibre for ethanol production. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:2267–72. · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.090
  22. Draude KM, Kurniawan CB, Du SJB. Effect of oxygen delignification on the rate and extent of enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic material. Bioresour Technol. 2001;79:113–20. · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(01)00055-4
  23. Newman RH, Vaidya AA, Sohel MI, Jack MW. Optimizing the enzyme loading and incubation time in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates. Bioresour Technol. 2013;129:33–8. · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.028
  24. Haven MO, Jørgensen H. Adsorption of β-glucosidases in two commercial preparations onto pretreated biomass and lignin. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:165. · doi:10.1186/1754-6834-6-165
  25. Rosales-Calderon O, Trajano HL, Posarac D, Duff SJB. Enzyme recycling by adsorption during hydrolysis of oxygen-delignified wheat straw. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2017;5:9701–8. · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01294
  26. Krogh KBRM, Harris PV, Olsen CL, Johansen KS, Hojer-Pedersen J, Borjesson J, et al. Characterization and kinetic analysis of a thermostable GH3 beta-glucosidase from Penicillium brasilianum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86:143–54. · doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2181-7
  27. Hyeon J-E, Yu K-O, Suh DJ, Suh Y-W, Lee SE, Lee J, et al. Production of minicellulosomes from Clostridium cellulovorans for the fermentation of cellulosic ethanol using engineered recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010;310:39–47. · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02035.x
  28. Cho J, Park J, Jeon J. Comparison of three- and two-column configurations in ethanol dehydration using azeotropic distillation. J Ind Eng Chem. 2006;12:206–15.
  29. Kang Q, Huybrechts J, Van Der Bruggen B, Baeyens J, Tan T, Dewil R. Hydrophilic membranes to replace molecular sieves in dewatering the bio-ethanol/water azeotropic mixture. Sep Purif Technol. 2014;136:144–9. · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.09.009
  30. Agrawal A, Kaushik N, Biswas S. Derivatives and applications of lignin—an insight. Scitechnol J. 2014;1:30–6.
  31. Coral Medina JD, Woiciechowski AL, Zandona Filho A, Bissoqui L, Noseda MD, de Souza Vandenberghe LP, et al. Biological activities and thermal behavior of lignin from oil palm empty fruit bunches as potential source of chemicals of added value. Ind Crops Prod. 2016;94:630–7. · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.046
  32. Strzemiecka B, Klapiszewski Ł, Jamrozik A, Szalaty T, Matykiewicz D, Sterzyński T, et al. Physicochemical characterization of functional lignin–silica hybrid fillers for potential application in abrasive tools. Materials (Basel). 2016;9:517. · doi:10.3390/ma9070517
  33. Edake M, Dalil M, Darabi Mahboub MJ, Dubois JL, Patience GS. Catalytic glycerol hydrogenolysis to 1,3-propanediol in a gas-solid fluidized bed. RSC Adv. 2017;7:3853–60. · doi:10.1039/c6ra27248g
  34. Avila Neto PM, da Silva GP, Coelho LF, Contiero J. Experimental design for 1,3-propanediol biosynthesis by K. Pneumoniae GLC29 using glycerol. J Appl Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;4:578–86.
  35. Edwin C, Clayrnont N. Bioconversion of a fermentable carbon source to 1,3-propanediol by a single microorganism. J Biol Chem. 1997;177:2151–6.
  36. Pavone A. Process economics program review 2013-03 Cerenol™. 2013.
  37. Grand View Research. 1,4 Butanediol (BDO) Market Worth $12.6 Billion By 2025. 2017. http://www.grandviewresearch.com/press-release/global-1-4-butanediol-market . Accessed 20 June 2017.
  38. Jeffrey SP. The many lives of BDO. 2016. https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/pressroom/cutting-edge-chemistry/the-many-lives-of-bdo.html . Accessed 20 #June 2017.
  39. Shantz T. Firm. Scitech J. 2019;6:2.
  40. Tan T, Yu J, Lu J, Zhang T. Biotechnology in China II, vol. 122. Springer; 2010. ISBN: 9783642149948.
  41. Qin J, Xiao Z, Ma C, Xie N, Liu P, Xu P. Production of 2,3-butanediol by Klebsiella pneumoniae using glucose and ammonium phosphate. Chinese J Chem Eng. 2006;14:132–6. · doi:10.1016/s1004-9541(06)60050-5
  42. Li L, Li K, Wang Y, Chen C, Xu Y, Zhang L, et al. Metabolic engineering of Enterobacter cloacae for high-yield production of enantiopure (2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol from lignocellulose-derived sugars. Metab Eng. 2015;28:19–27. · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2014.11.010
  43. Li L, Li K, Wang K, Chen C, Gao C, Ma C, et al. Efficient production of 2,3-butanediol from corn stover hydrolysate by using a thermophilic Bacillus licheniformis strain. Bioresour Technol. 2014;170:256–61. · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.101
  44. Metsoviti M, Paraskevaidi K, Koutinas A, Zeng A-P, Papanikolaou S. Production of 1,3-propanediol, 2,3-butanediol and ethanol by a newly isolated Klebsiella oxytoca strain growing on biodiesel-derived glycerol based media. Process Biochem. 2012;47:1872–82. · doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2012.06.011
  45. Lee SJ, Lee JH, Yang X, Kim SB, Lee JH, Yoo HY, et al. Phenolic compounds: strong inhibitors derived from lignocellulosic hydrolysate for 2,3-butanediol production by Enterobacter aerogenes. Biotechnol J. 2015;10:1920–8. · doi:10.1002/biot.201500090
  46. Joo J, Lee SJ, Yoo HY, Kim Y, Jang M, Lee J, et al. Improved fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates to 2,3-butanediol through investigation of effects of inhibitory compounds by Enterobacter aerogenes. Chem Eng J. 2016;306:916–24. · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.113
  47. Jantama K, Polyiam P, Khunnonkwao P, Chan S, Sangproo M, Khor K, et al. Efficient reduction of the formation of by-products and improvement of production yield of 2,3-butanediol by a combined deletion of alcohol dehydrogenase, acetate kinase-phosphotransacetylase, and lactate dehydrogenase genes in metabolically engineered Kl. Metab Eng. 2015;30:16–26. · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2015.04.004
  48. Ramachandran KB, Goma G. Effect of oxygen supply and dilution rate on the production of 2,3-butanediol in continuous bioreactor by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Enzym Microb Technol. 1987;9:107–11. · doi:10.1016/0141-0229(87)90152-9
  49. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Acetaldehyde. n.d. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15340856 . Accessed 26 May 2017.
  50. Eckert M, Fleischmann G, Jira R, Bolt HM, Golka K. Acetaldehyde Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry, vol. 1. New York: Wiley; 2012. p. 191–205.
  51. Faith WL, Keyes DB, Clarks RL. Industrial Chemicals. New York: Wiley; 1965.
  52. Howard M, Roberts M, Taylor S. C1 to acetyls: catalysis and process. Catal Today. 1993;18:325–54. · doi:10.1016/0920-5861(93)80060-e
  53. Oro LA, Claver C. Iridium complexes in organic synthesis. Wiley-VCH; 2009. ISBN: 3527623086. · doi:10.1002/9783527623075
  54. Brei VV, Sharanda ME, Prudius SV, Bondarenko EA. Synthesis of acetic acid from ethanol–water mixture over Cu/ZnO–ZrO2–Al2O3 catalyst. Applied Catal A Gen. 2013;458:196–200. · doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2013.03.038
  55. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Acetic Anhydride. n.d. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/acetic_anhydride#section=Top . Accessed 17 Apr 2017.
  56. Joseph RZ, Victor IA, Steven LC, Norma LL, Stanley WP, David MP. Eastman chemical company acetic anhydride process. Catal Today. 1992;13:73–91. · doi:10.1016/0920-5861(92)80188-s
  57. Froment G, Pijcke H, Goethals G. Thermal cracking of aceton. Chem Eng Sci. 1961;18:173–9. · doi:10.1016/0009-2509(61)80008-0
  58. Carpenter BH. Oxidation of acetaldehyde to acetic anhydride. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev. 1965;4:105–11. · doi:10.1021/i260013a024
  59. Madihah MS, Ariff AB, Khalil MS, Suraini AA, Karim MI. Anaerobic fermentation of gelatinized sago starch-derived sugars to acetone-1-butanol-ethanol solvent by Clostridium acetobutylicum. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2001;46:197–204. · doi:10.1007/bf02818533
  60. Thang VH, Kobayashi G. A novel process for direct production of acetone–butanol–ethanol from native starches using granular starch hydrolyzing enzyme by Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014;172:1818–31. · doi:10.1007/s12010-013-0620-5
  61. Loyarkat S, Cheirsilp B, Umsakul K. Direct conversion of sugars and organic acids to biobutanol by non-growing cells of Clostridium spp. incubated in a nitrogen-free medium. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013;171:1726–38. · doi:10.1007/s12010-013-0474-x
  62. Aoust D, Pinel D, Bajwa PK, Shireen T, Martin VJJ, Trevors JT, et al. Mutants of the pentose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis with improved tolerance to inhibitors in hardwood spent sulfite liquor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;104:892–900. · doi:10.1002/bit.22449
  63. PubChem. Ethyl acetate. 2017. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/8857 . Accessed 20 Mar 2017.
  64. Colley SW, Tabatabaei J, Waugh KC, Wood MA. The detailed kinetics and mechanism of ethyl ethanoate synthesis over a Cu/Cr2O3 catalyst. J Catal. 2005;236:21–33. · doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2005.09.012
  65. Tu YJ, Li C, Chen YW. Effect of Chromium promoter on copper-catalysts in ethanol dehydrogenation. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 1994;59:141–7. · doi:10.1002/jctb.280590205
  66. Inui K, Kurabayashi T, Sato S. Direct synthesis of ethyl acetate from ethanol carried out under pressure. J Catal. 2002;212:207–15. · doi:10.1006/jcat.2002.3769
  67. Inui K, Kurabayashi T, Sato S, Ichikawa N. Effective formation of ethyl acetate from ethanol over Cu–Zn–Zr–Al–O catalyst. J Mol Catal A: Chem. 2004;216:147–56. · doi:10.1016/j.molcata.2004.02.017
  68. Inui K, Kurabayashi T, Sato S. Direct synthesis of ethyl acetate from ethanol over Cu–Zn–Zr–Al–O catalyst. Appl Catal A Gen. 2002;237:53–61. · doi:10.1016/s0926-860x(02)00320-4
  69. Limited DSM. Beyond sugar. New Delhi: Dhampur Sugar Mills Limited; 2012.
  70. Limited DSM. Beyond sugar, annual report 2011–12. New Delhi: Dhampur Sugar Mills Limited; 2011.
  71. Donahue CJ, Amico TD, Exline JA. Synthesis and characterization of a gasoline oxygenate, ethyl tert-butyl ether. J Chem Educ. 2002;79:16–8. · doi:10.1021/ed079p16
  72. Vlasenko NV, Kochkin YN, Topka AV, Strizhak PE. Liquid-phase synthesis of ethyl tert-butyl ether over acid cation-exchange inorganic–organic resins. Appl Catal A Gen. 2009;362:82–7. · doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2009.04.021
  73. Fujii S, Yabe K, Furukawa M, Matsuura M, Aoyama H. A one-generation reproductive toxicity study of ethyl tertiary butyl ether in rats. Reprod Toxicol. 2010;30:414–21. · doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.04.013
  74. Puziy AM, Poddubnaya OI, Kochkin YN, Vlasenko NV, Tsyba MM. Acid properties of phosphoric acid activated carbons and their catalytic behavior in ethyl-tert-butyl ether synthesis. Carbon N Y. 2010;48:706–13. · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2009.10.015
  75. Segovia JJ, Villamañán RM, Martín MC, Chamorro CR, Villamañán MA. Thermodynamic characterization of bio-fuels: excess functions for binary mixtures containing ETBE and hydrocarbons. Energy. 2010;35:759–63. · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2009.09.025
  76. European Fuel Oxygenates Association. Technical product bulletin ETBE (Cas number 637-92-3). 2006.
  77. Jeffrey S. Plotkin. Beyond the Ethylene Steam Cracker. 2016. https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/pressroom/cutting-edge-chemistry/beyond-the-ethylene-steam-cracker.html . Accessed 21 Apr 2017.
  78. Pubchem. Ethylene glycol. n.d. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/174 . Accessed 20 Apr 2017.
  79. Aoshuang X. LANXESS strengthens position as leading EPDM rubber manufacturer in China. 2015. http://lanxess.cn/en/media-china/press-releases-china/lanxess-strengthens-position-as-leading-epdm-rubber-manufacturer/ . Accessed 26 May 2017.
  80. Covitch MJ. Olefin copolymer viscosity modifiers. In: Rudnick LR, editor. Lubricant additives—chemistry and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2003. p. 293–305. · doi:10.1201/9780824747404.ch10
  81. Choo C. German Lanxess to produce bio-based EPDM rubber in Brazil end-2011. 2011. https://www.platts.com/latest-news/petrochemicals/singapore/german-lanxess-to-produce-bio-based-epdm-rubber-8365763 . · doi:10.1016/s1350-4789(11)70417-2
  82. Ramcharan. Overview on EPDM rubber. Prod Dev Inf. 2013;3:1–6.
  83. Pourriahi S, Hanover. Brazil automotive downturn impacts Lanxess operations. 2016. http://www.european-rubber-journal.com/2016/03/23/brazil-automotive-downturn-impacts-lanxess-operations/ . Accessed 1 Jan 2017.
  84. Nhien LC, Long NVD, Kim S, Lee M. Design and optimization of intensified biorefinery process for furfural production through a systematic procedure. Biochem Eng J. 2016;116:166–75. · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2016.04.002
  85. Dalgleish G. Bagasse utilization at Illovo sugar. Scottburgh: Sezela Mill; 2002.
  86. Vedernikovs N, State L, Chemistry W, Kampars V. Changes in the birch wood lignocellulose composition in the pretreatment process. Sci J Riga Technol Univ. 2010;22:68–73.
  87. Merat N, Godawa C, Gaset A. High selective production of tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol: catalytic hydrogenation of furfural and furfuryl alcohol. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2007;48:145–59. · doi:10.1002/jctb.280480205
  88. Jyothi AN, Sasikiran K, Nambisan B, Balagopalan C. Optimisation of glutamic acid production from cassava starch factory residues using Brevibacterium divaricatum. Process Biochem. 2005;40:3576–9. · doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.046
  89. Su Y, Yamada K. Studies on l-glutamic acid fermentation. Bull Agric Chem Soc Japan. 1960;24:69–74.
  90. Amin GA, Al-Talhi A. Production of l-glutamic acid by immobilized cell reactor of the bacterium Corynebacterium glutamicum entrapped into carrageenan gel Beads. World Appl Sci J. 2007;2:62–7.
  91. Kumar R, Vikramachakravarthi D, Pal P. Chemical engineering and processing: process intensification production and purification of glutamic acid: a critical review towards process intensification. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif. 2014;81:59–71. · doi:10.1016/j.cep.2014.04.012
  92. Fufeng Group Limited. 2013 Annual report. 2013. ISBN: 9788867808243. · doi:10.1016/s1364-5439(13)70188-6
  93. Das K, Anis M, Azemi BMNM, Ismail N. Fermentation and recovery of glutamic acid from palm waste hydrolysate by ion-exchange resin column. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1995;48:551–5. · doi:10.1002/bit.260480519
  94. Spivey JJ, Han Y-F, Dooley KM. SPR Catalysis V26. Royal society of chemistry; 2014. ISBN: 1849739188. · doi:10.1039/9781782620037
  95. Jiménez-Quero A, Pollet E, Zhao M, Marchioni E, Averous L, Phalip V. Fungal fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass for itaconic and fumaric acid production. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;27:1–8. · doi:10.4014/jmb.1607.07057
  96. Koffas M, Stephanopoulos G. Strain improvement by metabolic engineering: lysine production as a case study for systems biology. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005;16:361–6. · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2005.04.010
  97. Christoph W, Becker J. The l-lysine story: from metabolic pathways to industrial production. In: Amino acid biosynthesis pathways, regulation metabolism engineering. Berlin: Springer; 2007. p. 39–70.
  98. Ohnishi J, Katahira R, Mitsuhashi S, Kakita S, Ikeda M. A novel gnd mutation leading to increased l-lysine production in Corynebacterium glutamicum. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;242:265–74. · doi:10.1016/j.femsle.2004.11.014
  99. Ikeda M. Amino acid production processes. Microb Prod l-Amino Acids. Berlin: Springer; 2003. p. 1–35.
  100. Ohnishi J, Hayashi M, Mitsuhashi S, Ikeda M. Efficient 40 C fermentation of l-lysine by a new Corynebacterium glutamicum mutant developed by genome breeding. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;62:69–75. · doi:10.1007/s00253-003-1254-2
  101. Sakai S, Tsuchida Y, Okino S, Ichihashi O, Kawaguchi H, Watanabe T, et al. Effect of lignocellulose-derived inhibitors on growth of and ethanol production by growth-arrested Corynebacterium glutamicum R. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:2349–53. · doi:10.1128/aem.02880-06
  102. Schneider J, Niermann K, Wendisch VF. Production of the amino acids l-glutamate, l-lysine, l-ornithine and l-arginine from arabinose by recombinant Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biotechnol J. 2011;154:191–8. · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.07.009
  103. Siqueira G, Arantes V. Nanocelluloses from lignocellulosic biomass. In: Kumar R, Singh S, Balan V, editors. Valorization lignocellulose biomass a biorefinary. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers; 2016. p. 293–320.
  104. Pva COF, With C, Nanofibers C, By O. Composites with cellulose nanofibers obtained by. BioResources. 2011;6:487–512.
  105. Eriksen O, Syverud K, Gregersen O. The use of microfibrillated cellulose produced from kraft pulp as strength enhancer in TMP paper. Nord Pulp Pap Res J. 2008;23:299–304. · doi:10.3183/npprj-2008-23-03-p299-304
  106. Eriksson L. Nanocellulose. Nanotechnol Mag. 2017;977:6–10.
  107. Herzele S, Veigel S, Liebner F, Zimmermann T, Gindl-Altmutter W. Reinforcement of polycaprolactone with microfibrillated lignocellulose. Ind Crops Prod. 2016;93:302–8. · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.12.051
  108. NatureWorks. NatureWorks introduces Ingeo 3D860—a new formulation for PLA filament for 3D printing that provides high impact strength and heat resistance. 2016. http://www.natureworksllc.com/News-and-Events/Press-Releases/2016/03-29-16-Ingeo-3D860-3D-Printing . Accessed 10 May 2017.
  109. Chuah HH. Crystallization kinetics of poly(trimethylene terephthalate). Polym Eng Sci. 2001;41:308–13. · doi:10.1002/pen.10730
  110. Li P, Yang G. Synthesis, morphology, and nonisothermal crystallization behavior of poly (trimethylene terephthalate)/poly (propylene glycol) segmented random copolymers. Polym Adv Technol. 2016;27:1029–37. · DOI
  111. Li M, Jeong YG. Preparation and characterization of high-performance poly(trimethylene terephthalate) nanocomposites reinforced with exfoliated graphite. Macromol Mater Eng. 2011;296:159–67. · doi:10.1002/mame.201000295
  112. Roquette. ROQUETTE Press Kit. 2008.
  113. Karen Laird. Roquette brings world’s largest isosorbide production unit on stream. 2015. https://www.plasticstoday.com/content/roquette-brings-worlds-largest-isosorbide-production-unit-on-stream/62964546722068 . Accessed 23 Mar 2017. · doi:10.1016/s0306-3747(15)30073-7
  114. Simakova IL, Demidova YS, Murzina EV, Aho A, Murzin DY. Structure sensitivity in catalytic hydrogenation of galactose and arabinose over Ru/C catalysts. Catal Lett. 2016;146:1291–9. · doi:10.1007/s10562-016-1752-3
  115. Squalene NL, Oil O, Risk C. A review and hypothesis. Carcinogenesis. 1997;6:1101–3.
  116. Guzman D. Bio-succinic acid market ready to roar. ICIS Chem Bus. 2012;281:28.
  117. Guo X, Zhang R, Li Z, Dai D, Li C, Zhou X. A novel pathway construction in Candida tropicalis for direct xylitol conversion from corncob xylan. Bioresour Technol. 2013;128:547–52. · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.155
  118. Flores ME, Perez R, Huitron C. b-Xylosidase and xylanase characterization and production by Streptomyces sp. CH-M-1035. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1997;24:410–6. · doi:10.1046/j.1472-765x.1997.00149.x
  119. Misra S, Raghuwanshi S, Saxena RK. Evaluation of corncob hemicellulosic hydrolysate for xylitol production by adapted strain of Candida tropicalis. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;92:1596–601. · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.033
  120. Ping Y, Ling HZ, Song G, Ge JP. Xylitol production from non-detoxified corncob hemicellulose acid hydrolysate by Candida tropicalis. Biochem Eng J. 2013;75:86–91. · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2013.03.022
  121. S2G BioChem. S2G BioChem announces collaboration with Mondelēz International for new sweetener process. 2016. http://s2gbiochem.com/about-us/news/press-27-10-16.php . Accessed 25 May 2017.
  122. PubChem. Methods of manufacturing after. 2019. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/2%2C3-butanediol#section=Methods-of-Manufacturing . Accessed 5 June 2019.
  123. Eckert M, Fleischmann G, Jira R, Bolt HM, Golka K. Acetaldehyde. Ullman’s Encycl Ind Chem. 2012;2:569–84.
  124. Bengelsdorf FR, Poehlein A, Flitsch SK, Linder S, Schiel-Bengelsdorf B, Stegmann BA, et al. Industrial application of ABE fermentation. In: Wittmann C, Liao JC, Lee SY, Nielsen J, Stephanopoulos G, editors. Industrial biotechnology microorganism. New York: Wiley; 2017. p. 353.
  125. De Carvalho JC, Magalhães AI, Soccol CR. Biobased itaconic acid market and research trends-is it really a promising chemical? Chim Oggi/Chem Today. 2018;36:56–8.
  126. Trouw Nutrition International. New directions towards. 2014;Q2:2014.
  127. Market Study Report LLC. Activated plyethgplene Glycol market size to surge at 2.5% CAGR to reach 170 million USD by 2024. 2019. https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/activated-polyethylene-glycol-market-size-to-surge-at-25-cagr-to-reach-170-million-usd-by-2024-2019-04-02 . Accessed 17 June 2019. · doi:10.1016/j.focat.2019.06.007
  128. Nova Institute for Econogy and Innovation. Succinic acid: new bio-based building block with a huge market and environmental potential?. Hürth: Nova Institute for Econogy and Innovation; 2018.

Cited by

See all 503

Metadata

Authors
Rosales-Calderon, O., & Arantes, V.
Venue
Biotechnology for Biofuels
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-10-08
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
240-240
ISSN
1754-6834 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s13068-019-1529-1
OpenAlex
W2979868576
Cited by
503
References
292
FWCI
25.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (15/02862-5)
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (308715/2015-2)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on commercial-scale high-value products that can be produced alongside cellulosic ethanol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13068-019-1529-1
The paper
Rosales-Calderon, O., & Arantes, V. (2019). A review on commercial-scale high-value products that can be produced alongside cellulosic ethanol. Biotechnology for Biofuels. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-019-1529-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.