The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of gastro-intestinal nematode infection on sheep performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infections are common in domestic sheep and impact directly and indirectly on the health of infected animals as well as on the associated economic production. In this study, we aim at summarizing the current knowledge on the influence of GIN infections on sheep production by conducting a systematic review. A subsequent meta-analysis of relevant studies was performed to provide an estimate of the effect of GIN infections on weight gain, wool production and milk yield. METHODS: A literature search was performed on the CAB, Pubmed and Web of Science database for the period 1960-2012. Inclusion criteria were: 1) Measurement of at least one production parameter. 2) Comparison between groups of sheep with different nematode burdens. 3) Same conditions regarding all aspects except parasite burden between groups. 4) Quantitative measurements of one or more production traits. RESULTS: Altogether, 88 studies describing 218 trials were included in this review. The majority of studies (86%) reported that GIN infections had a negative effect on production but this was reported to be statistically significant in only 43% of the studies. Meta-analysis indicated that performances of sheep infected with nematodes was 85, 90 and 78% of the performance in uninfected individuals for weight gain, wool production and milk yield respectively. Our results suggest a possible reporting bias or small study effect for the estimation of the impact of GIN infections on weight gain. Finally, a general linear model provided an estimate for the decrease in weight gain in relation to the increase in faecal egg count of nematodes. CONCLUSION: This study underlines the importance of GIN infections for sheep production and highlights the need to improve parasite management in sheep, in particular in face of challenges such as anthelmintic resistance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Sterne, J. A. C., Sutton, A. J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Terrin, N., Jones, D. R., Lau, J., Carpenter, J., Rucker, G., Harbord, R. M., Schmid, C. H., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d4002 · Cited by 7,709
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704 · cited 1×
“Since this standardized measurement is a ratio, logarithmic transformation, as described in [19], was used for the computation of confidence intervals and to perform further analysis.”
MethodDrug resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance: a status report
Kaplan, R. M. (2004) · Trends in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.pt.2004.08.001 · Cited by 1,276
Meta‐Analysis in Medical Research: The Handbook for the Understanding and Practice of Meta‐Analysis
(2005) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470994894 · Cited by 687
Nutrition–parasite interaction
Coop, R. L., & Kyriazakis, I. (1999) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0304-4017(99)00070-9 · Cited by 593
Cited by
Ramünke, S., Melville, L., Rinaldi, L., Hertzberg, H., de Waal, T., von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G., Cringoli, G., Mavrot, F., Skuce, P., Krücken, J., et al. (2016) · International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance · doi:10.1016/j.ijpddr.2016.10.002 · Cited by 69
Self-citationCorrêa, P. S., Mendes, L. W., Lemos, L. N., Crouzoulon, P., Niderkorn, V., Hoste, H., Costa-Júnior, L. M., Tsai, S. M., Faciola, A. P., Abdalla, A. L., et al. (2020) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1093/femsec/fiaa024 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Mavrot, F., Hertzberg, H., & Torgerson, P.
- Venue
- Parasites & Vectors
- Published
- 2015-10-24
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 557-557
- ISSN
- 1756-3305 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1839129633
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 4.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of gastro-intestinal nematode infection on sheep performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13071-015-1164-z
- The paper
- Mavrot, F., Hertzberg, H., & Torgerson, P. (2015). Effect of gastro-intestinal nematode infection on sheep performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasites & Vectors. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1164-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.