Malaria elimination in Botswana, 2012–2014: achievements and challenges
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Botswana significantly reduced its malaria burden between 2000 and 2012. Incidence dropped from 0.99 to 0.01 % and deaths attributed to malaria declined from 12 to 3. The country initiated elimination strategies in October 2012. We examine the progress and challenges during implementation and identify future needs for a successful program in Botswana. METHODS: A national, rapid notification and response strategy was developed. Cases detected through the routine passive surveillance system at health facilities were intended to initiate screening of contacts around a positive case during follow up. Positive cases were reported to district health management teams to activate district rapid response teams (DRRT). The health facility and the DRRT were to investigate the cases, and screen household members within 100 m of case households within 48 h of notification using rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) and microscopy. Positive malaria cases detected in health facilities were used for spatial analysis. RESULTS: There were 1808 malaria cases recorded in Botswana during 26 months from October, 2012 to December, 2014. Males were more frequently infected (59%) than females. Most cases (60%) were reported from Okavango district which experienced an outbreak in 2013 and 2014. Among the factors creating challenges for malaria eradication, only 1148 cases (63.5%) were captured by the required standardized notification forms. In total, 1080 notified cases were diagnosed by RDT. Of the positive malaria cases, only 227 (12.6%) were monitored at the household level. One hundred (8.7%) cases were associated with national or transnational movement of patients. Local movements of infected individuals within Botswana accounted for 31 cases while 69 (6.01%) cases were imported from other countries. Screening individuals in and around index households identified 37 additional, asymptomatic infections. Oscillating, sporadic and new malaria hot-spots were detected in Botswana during the study period. CONCLUSION: Botswana's experience shows some of the practical challenges of elimination efforts. Among them are the substantial movements of human infections within and among countries, and the persistence of asymptomatic reservoir infections. Programmatically, challenges include improving the speed of communicating and improving the thoroughness when responding to newly identified cases. The country needs further sustainable interventions to target infections if it is to successfully achieve its elimination goal.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Botswana, but not Tanzania, is one of nine countries worldwide that uses indoor residence spraying of traditional structures for control of malaria-carrying mosquitos.
“Interestingly, Botswana, but not Tanzania, is one of nine countries worldwide that uses indoor residence spraying of traditional structures for control of malaria-carrying mosquitos [70, 71].”
From Population structure of human gut bacteria in a diverse cohort from rural Tanzania and Botswana (2019) · cites this paper as [70]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 44
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [8]Memoire A Botswana malaria program performance review towards a malaria free Botswana 2009 Gabrone, Botswana. Ministry of Health
- [31]Roll Back Malaria – Progress and Impact Series Country report number 8. October 2013. Focus on South Africa, Sction d – impacts and cases averted pages 62–63.
- [36]WHO IST East and Sothern Africa Malaria Bulletin - December 2014.
- [59]WHO WHO IST East and Southern Africa Malaria Bulletin 2014 2014
- Authors
- Chihanga, S., Haque, U., Chanda, E., Mosweunyane, T., Moakofhi, K., Jibril, H. B., Motlaleng, M., Zhang, W., & Glass, G. E.
- Affiliations
- Ministry of Health (BW)
- University of Florida (US)
- World Health Organization (CH)
- Academy of Military Medical Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Haque, Ubydul
- Venue
- Parasites & Vectors
- Published
- 2016-02-24
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-99
- ISSN
- 1756-3305 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4765051
- OpenAlex
- W2278070482
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 5.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Parasites & Vectors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- University of Florida
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine and Tropical Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
- Keywords
- malaria elimination, Botswana, rapid response teams, case notification, contact screening, asymptomatic malaria, imported malaria, malaria hotspots, malaria surveillance, malaria incidence, malaria mortality
- MeSH terms
- Botswana, Communicable Disease Control, Humans, Malaria, Disease Eradication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review