Animal trypanosomosis in clinically healthy cattle of north Cameroon: epidemiological implications
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The control of animal trypanosomosis consists, amongst other things, of the punctual treatment of new cases, primarily diagnosed by pastoralists on the basis of clinical signs. This practice suggests that many apparently healthy infected animals are left untreated. In this study animal trypanosomosis in clinically healthy zebu cattle was evaluated, the distribution of the vectors established and the epidemiological implications discussed. METHODS: In 2014 two cross-sectional surveys were carried out in the Cambeef ranch. A total of 866 blood samples were collected from cattle in different sites: 549 in the dry season and 317 in the rainy season. The blood samples were subjected to parasitological examination using the buffy coat method and to PCV determination. An entomological survey on animal trypanosomosis vectors was undertaken during tsetse flies caught were identified and the mid-gut of each living non-teneral tsetse fly was examined for infections using a microscope. RESULTS: An overall trypanosomosis prevalence of 9% was found in the cattle examined. There were significantly (P < 0.05) more trypanosome infected cattle in the dry season than the rainy season. Trypanosome-infected cattle had significantly (P < 0.05) lower Body Condition Scores (BCS) and Packed Cell Volumes (PCV) in the dry season than in the rainy season. Anemia was positively correlated with trypanosome infection. The likelihood for an animal to be parasitologically free of trypanosome infection was at least three times as high in the Gudali breed as compared with the white and red Fulani breeds. Species of trypanosomes identified were Trypanosoma vivax (73.23%), Trypanosoma congolense (15.49%) and Trypanosoma brucei (11.27%). A total of 390 tsetse flies and 103 tabanids were trapped. Two species of tsetse flies were identified: Glossina tachinoides (33.59%) and G. morsitans submorsitans (41%). Nine of the 194 non-teneral flies were infected with trypanosomes. CONCLUSION: Carriers of trypanosomes are present amongst apparently healthy cattle in the study site. Attempts to successfully reduce the population of reservoir trypanosomes within herds and control the disease will need to consider mass screening once every year and this should be associated with drug sensitivity tests.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a difference in trypanosome-specific antiparasite antibody secreting cells in spleen and B cell activation between trypanotolerant and trypanosusceptible cattle.
“There is a difference in trypanosome-specific antiparasite Ab secreting cells in spleen and B cell activation between trypanotolerant and trypanosusceptible cattle (La Greca et al., 2014; Mamoudou et al., 2016; Morrison et al., 2016).”
From Identification of Candidate Signature Genes and Key Regulators Associated With Trypanotolerance in the Sheko Breed (2019) · cites this paper as Mamoudou et al., 2016
The Discussion reports that Gudali cattle were more likely than white and red Fulani cattle to be free of detectable trypanosome infection and suggests this could indicate greater tolerance. The Methods describe blood-based parasite detection, and the Results report infection, anaemia, and body-condition measures. Searches for spleen antibody-secreting cells and B-cell activation found no passage addressing the immune-cell differences claimed. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- [3]Mamoudou A, Ebene NJ, Pierre FS, Mfopit MY. Prevalence and impact of bovine trypanosomiasis in Mayo Rey division, a Soudano-Sahelian zone of Cameroon. JParasitol Vector Biol. 2015;7:80-88.
- [10]Bronsvoort M Morgan K Tanya VN Foot-and-mouth disease and livestock husbandry practices in the Adamawa Province of Cameroun 2002 Liverpool University of Liverpool, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences and Animal Husbandry 14690088
- [12]Ezanno P, Ickowicz A, Bocquier F. Factors affecting the body condition score of N’dama cows under extensive range management Enzanno in southern Senegal. Anim Res. 2003; 52(5):37-48.
- [13]Woo PTK The haematocrit centrifuge technique for the diagnosis of African trypanosomiasis Acta Trop 1970 27 384 386 4396363
- [15]Murray M Murray PK Mcintyre WIM An improved parasitological technique of the diagnosis of African trypanosomiasis Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1977 71 325 326 10.1016/0035-9203(77)90110-9 563634 · DOI
- [22]Grace D Himstedt H Sidibe I Randolph T Clausen PH Comparing FAMACHA eye color chart and hemoglobin color scale tests for detecting anemia and improving treatment of bovine trypanosomosis in West Africa Vet Parasitol 2007 147 26 39 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.03.022 17498880 · DOI
- [24]Moritz M Ewing D Garabed BR On Not Knowing Zoonotic Diseases: Pastoralists’ Ethnoveterinary Knowledge in the Far North Region of Cameroon Hum Organ 2013 72 1 1 11 10.17730/humo.72.1.72672642576gw247 23990687 PMC3754808 · DOI
- [27]Mamoudou A, Zoli A, Tanenbe C, Andrikaye JP, Bourdanne, Marcotty T, Delespaux V, Clausen HP, Geerts S. Evaluation sur le terrain et sur souris de la résistance des trypanosomes des bovins du plateau de l’Adamaoua au Cameroun à l’acéturate de diminazène et au chlorure d’isométamidium. Revue Elev Méd Vét Pays Trop. 2006;59(1–4):11–16
- [28]Geerts S Holmes PH Diall O Eisler MC African bovine trypanosomosis: the problem of drug resistance Trends Parasitol 2001 17 25 28 10.1016/S1471-4922(00)01827-4 11137737 · DOI
- [29]Delespaux V Geysen D Van Den Bossche P Geerts S Molecular tools for the rapid detection of drug resistance in animal trypanosomes Trends Parasitol 2008 24 236 242 10.1016/j.pt.2008.02.006 18420457 · DOI
- [30]Vougat R Foyet H Garrabed R Ziebe R Antioxidant activity and phytochemical constituent of two plants used to manage foot and mouth disease in the Far North Region of Cameroon J Intercult Ethnopharmacol 2014 4 1 40 46 26401383 PMC4566761
- [31]Van Den Bossche P Doran M Connor RJ An analysis of trypanocidal drug use in the Eastern Province of Zambia Acta Trop 2000 75 247 258 10.1016/S0001-706X(00)00059-0 10708665 · DOI
- [33]Melaku A Birasa B Drugs and drug resistance in African animal trypanosomosis: A review European J Appl Sci 2013 5 3 84 91
- [36]Delafosse A Thebaud E Desquesnes M Michaux Y Epidemiology of Trypanosoma vivax infection in cattle in the tse-tse free area of Lake Chad Prev Vet Med 2006 74 108 119 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.10.006 16321453 · DOI
- [37]Holmes PH Katunguka-Rwakishaya E Bennison JJ Wassink GJ Parkins JJ Impact of nutrition on the pathophysiology of bovine trypanosomiasis Parasitology 2000 120 73 85 10.1017/S0031182099005806 10874711 · DOI
- [39]Radostitis OM Gay CC Hinchcliff KW Veterinary Medicine, Text book of the disease of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats 2007 tenth Baillier Tindall, London, Philadelphia, New York Saunders Elsevier
- [40]Murray M Dexter TM Anaemia in bovine African trypanosomiasis: A review Acta Trop 1988 45 389 432 2907267
- [41]Trail JCM D’ieteren GDM Murray M Ordner G Yangari G Maille JC Viviani P Colardelle C Sauveroche B Measurements of trypanotolerance criteria and their effect on reproductive performance of N’Dama cattle Vet Parasitol 1993 45 241 255 10.1016/0304-4017(93)90079-3 8447067 · DOI
- [42]Marcotty T Simukoko H Berkvens D Vercruysse J Praet N Van Den Bossche P Evaluating the use of packed cell volume as an indicator of trypanosomal infections in cattle in eastern Zambia Prev Vet Med 2008 87 288 300 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.05.002 18586340 · DOI
- [44]Moloo SK Kutuza SB Comparative study on the infection rates of different laboratory strains of Glossina species by Trypanosoma congolense Med Vet Entomol 1988 2 253 257 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1988.tb00192.x 2980181 · DOI
- [45]Desquesnes M Dia M Trypanosoma vivax: Mechanical transmission in cattle by one of the most common African tabanids, Atylotus agrestis Vet Parasitol 2003 119 9 19 10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.10.015 12810044 · DOI
- [46]Desquesnes M Biteau-Coroller F Bouyer J Dia ML Foil L Development of a mathematical model for mechanical transmission of trypanosomes and other pathogens of cattle transmitted by tabanids Int J Parasitol 2009 39 333 346 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.07.004 18755195 · DOI
- [49]Ryan L Molyneux DH Observations on and comparisons of various, traps for the collection of Glossinidae and other Diptera in Africa Revue Elev Méd Vét Pays Trop 1982 35 165 172 7163575
- [50]Penchenier L, Laveissiere C. Manuel de luttecontre la maladie du sommeil, Stratégies, Vol 2, Edition OCEAC. Yaoundé, Cameroon: OCEAC; 2000.
- [52]Leak SGA Mulatu W Advance of Glossina morsitans submorsitans and G. pallidipesalong the Ghibe river system in south west Ethiopia Acta Trop 1999 55 91 95 10.1016/0001-706X(93)90052-D 7903142 · DOI
- [54]Tchouomene-Labou J Nana-Djeunga H Simo G Njitchouang GR Cuny G Asonganyi T Spatial and temporal variations relevant to tsetse control in the Bipindi focus of southern Cameroon ParasitVectors 2013 6 193 PMC3701558 23815985
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mekonnen, Y. A., Gültas, M., Effa, K., Hanotte, O., & Schmitt, A. O. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.01095 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“There is a difference in trypanosome-specific antiparasite Ab secreting cells in spleen and B cell activation between trypanotolerant and trypanosusceptible cattle (La Greca et al., 2014; Mamoudou et al., 2016; Morrison et al., 2016).”
Background
- Authors
- Mamoudou, A., Njanloga, A., Hayatou, A., Suh, P. F., & Achukwi, M. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Ngaoundéré (CM)
- Université de Yaoundé I (CM)
- Institut de Recherche Agricole pour le Développement (CM)
- Venue
- Parasites & Vectors
- Published
- 2016-04-13
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 206-206
- ISSN
- 1756-3305 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4831123
- OpenAlex
- W2340106514
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 3.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Parasites & Vectors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Trypanosoma species research and implications
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- animal trypanosomiasis, Bos indicus, asymptomatic carriers, trypanosome prevalence, Glossina tachinoides, Glossina morsitans submorsitans, tsetse flies, Tabanidae, Trypanosoma vivax, Trypanosoma congolense, Trypanosoma brucei, seasonal variation, body condition score, anemia, hematocrit, cattle breeds, reservoir hosts, Cameroon, Fulani cattle
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cameroon, Cattle, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Insect Vectors, Male, Seasons, Trypanosoma, Trypanosomiasis, Bovine, Tsetse Flies, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review