Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

History, epidemiology and diagnostics of dengue in the American and Brazilian contexts: a review

Open access
Salles, Tiago Souza, da Encarnação Sá-Guimarães, Thayane, de Alvarenga, Evelyn Seam Lima, Guimarães-Ribeiro, Victor, de Meneses, Marcelo Damião Ferreira, de Castro-Salles, Patricia Faria, dos Santos, Carlucio Rocha, do Amaral Melo, Ana Claudia, Soares, Marcia Regina, Ferreira, Davis Fernandes, Moreira, Monica Ferreira·2018·Parasites & Vectors

Abstract

Dengue virus (DENV), an arbovirus transmitted by mosquitoes, has become a major threat to American human life, reaching approximately 23 million cases from 1980 to 2017. Brazil is among the countries most affected by this terrible viral disease, with 13.6 million cases. DENV has four different serotypes, DENV1-4, which show a broad clinical spectrum. Dengue creates a staggering epidemiological and economic burden for endemic countries. Without a specific therapy and with a commercial vaccine that presents some problems relative to its full effectiveness, initiatives to improve vector control strategies, early disease diagnostics and the development of vaccines and antiviral drugs are priorities. In this study, we present the probable origins of dengue in America and the trajectories of its spread. Overall, dengue diagnostics are costly, making the monitoring of dengue epidemiology more difficult and affecting physicians' therapeutic decisions regarding dengue patients, especially in developing countries. This review also highlights some recent and important findings regarding dengue in Brazil and the Americas. We also summarize the existing DENV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) diagnostic tests to provide an improved reference since these tests are useful and accurate at discriminating DENV from other flaviviruses that co-circulate in the Americas. Additionally, these DENV PCR assays ensure virus serotyping, enabling epidemiologic monitoring.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13071-018-2830-8

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Salles, T. S., da Encarnação Sá-Guimarães, T., de Alvarenga, E. S. L., Guimarães-Ribeiro, V., de Meneses, M. D. F., de Castro-Salles, P. F., dos Santos, C. R., do Amaral Melo, A. C., Soares, M. R., Ferreira, D. F., & Moreira, M. F.
Venue
Parasites & Vectors
Published
2018-04-24
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
264-264
ISSN
1756-3305 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2806217711
Cited by
256
References
28
FWCI
24.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: History, epidemiology and diagnostics of dengue in the American and Brazilian contexts: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13071-018-2830-8
The paper
Salles, T. S., da Encarnação Sá-Guimarães, T., de Alvarenga, E. S. L., Guimarães-Ribeiro, V., de Meneses, M. D. F., de Castro-Salles, P. F., dos Santos, C. R., do Amaral Melo, A. C., Soares, M. R., Ferreira, D. F., & Moreira, M. F. (2018). History, epidemiology and diagnostics of dengue in the American and Brazilian contexts: a review. Parasites & Vectors. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2830-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.