Cited by 63Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Neoantigen-specific immunity in low mutation burden colorectal cancers of the consensus molecular subtype 4

Open access
van den Bulk, Jitske, Verdegaal, Els M. E., Ruano, Dina, Ijsselsteijn, Marieke E., Visser, Marten, van der Breggen, Ruud, Duhen, Thomas, van der Ploeg, Manon +7 more·2019·Genome Medicine

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of checkpoint blockade immunotherapies in colorectal cancer is currently restricted to a minority of patients diagnosed with mismatch repair-deficient tumors having high mutation burden. However, this observation does not exclude the existence of neoantigen-specific T cells in colorectal cancers with low mutation burden and the exploitation of their anti-cancer potential for immunotherapy. Therefore, we investigated whether autologous neoantigen-specific T cell responses could also be observed in patients diagnosed with mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancers. Methods: Whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing were performed on cancer and normal tissues from seven colorectal cancer patients diagnosed with mismatch repair-proficient tumors to detect putative neoantigens. Corresponding neo-epitopes were synthesized and tested for recognition by in vitro expanded T cells that were isolated from tumor tissues (tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes) and from peripheral mononuclear blood cells stimulated with tumor material. Results: Neoantigen-specific T cell reactivity was detected to several neo-epitopes in the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes of three patients while their respective cancers expressed 15, 21, and 30 non-synonymous variants. Cell sorting of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes based on the co-expression of CD39 and CD103 pinpointed the presence of neoantigen-specific T cells in the CD39+CD103+ T cell subset. Strikingly, the tumors containing neoantigen-reactive TIL were classified as consensus molecular subtype 4 (CMS4), which is associated with TGF-β pathway activation and worse clinical outcome. Conclusions: We have detected neoantigen-targeted reactivity by autologous T cells in mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancers of the CMS4 subtype. These findings warrant the development of specific immunotherapeutic strategies that selectively boost the activity of neoantigen-specific T cells and target the TGF-β pathway to reinforce T cell reactivity in this patient group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13073-019-0697-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 63

Authors
van den Bulk, J., Verdegaal, E. M. E., Ruano, D., Ijsselsteijn, M. E., Visser, M., van der Breggen, R., Duhen, T., van der Ploeg, M., de Vries, N. L., Oosting, J., Peeters, K. C. M. J., Weinberg, A. D., Farina-Sarasqueta, A., van der Burg, S. H., & de Miranda, N. F. C. C.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
Genome Medicine
Published
2019-12
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
87-87
ISSN
1756-994X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2997386439
Cited by
63
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • KWF Bas Mulder Award UL (2015-7664)
  • ZonMw Veni grant (016.176.l44)
  • Fight Colorectal Cancer-Michael’s Mission-AACR Fellowship in Young Onset, Late-Stage Colorectal Cancer Research 2015 (15-40-1645-DEMI)
  • LUMC PhD fellowship (-)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
colorectal cancer, neoantigens, neoantigen-specific T cells, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, TGF-beta signaling, cancer immunotherapy
MeSH terms
Calponins, Epitopes, Antigens, Neoplasm, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Immunotherapy, Interferon-gamma, Microfilament Proteins, Mutation, Peptides, Transcription Factors, Colorectal Neoplasms, T-Lymphocyte Subsets, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, DNA Mismatch Repair

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review