Cited by 57Systemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesMachine Learning in HealthcareMedical Coding and Health Information

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rule-based and machine learning algorithms identify patients with systemic sclerosis accurately in the electronic health record

Open access
Jamian, Lia, Wheless, Lee, Crofford, Leslie J., Barnado, April·2019·Arthritis Research & Therapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare disease with studies limited by small sample sizes. Electronic health records (EHRs) represent a powerful tool to study patients with rare diseases such as SSc, but validated methods are needed. We developed and validated EHR-based algorithms that incorporate billing codes and clinical data to identify SSc patients in the EHR. METHODS: We used a de-identified EHR with over 3 million subjects and identified 1899 potential SSc subjects with at least 1 count of the SSc ICD-9 (710.1) or ICD-10-CM (M34*) codes. We randomly selected 200 as a training set for chart review. A subject was a case if diagnosed with SSc by a rheumatologist, dermatologist, or pulmonologist. We selected the following algorithm components based on clinical knowledge and available data: SSc ICD-9 and ICD-10-CM codes, positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) (titer ≥ 1:80), and a keyword of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP). We performed both rule-based and machine learning techniques for algorithm development. Positive predictive values (PPVs), sensitivities, and F-scores (which account for PPVs and sensitivities) were calculated for the algorithms. RESULTS: PPVs were low for algorithms using only 1 count of the SSc ICD-9 code. As code counts increased, the PPVs increased. PPVs were higher for algorithms using ICD-10-CM codes versus the ICD-9 code. Adding a positive ANA and RP keyword increased the PPVs of algorithms only using ICD billing codes. Algorithms using ≥ 3 or ≥ 4 counts of the SSc ICD-9 or ICD-10-CM codes and ANA positivity had the highest PPV at 100% but a low sensitivity at 50%. The algorithm with the highest F-score of 91% was ≥ 4 counts of the ICD-9 or ICD-10-CM codes with an internally validated PPV of 90%. A machine learning method using random forests yielded an algorithm with a PPV of 84%, sensitivity of 92%, and F-score of 88%. The most important feature was RP keyword. CONCLUSIONS: Algorithms using only ICD-9 codes did not perform well to identify SSc patients. The highest performing algorithms incorporated clinical data with billing codes. EHR-based algorithms can identify SSc patients across a healthcare system, enabling researchers to examine important outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13075-019-2092-7

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Development of algorithms to identify patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) in the electronic health record (EHR). At least a 1-time count of the SSc ICD-9 code (710.1) or ICD-10-CM codes (M34*) was applied to the 3 million subjects in Vanderbilt’s Synthetic Derivative, which resulted in 1899 potential SSc cases. Of these 1899 potential SSc cases, 200 were randomly selected for a training set to develop and test algorithms with various combinations of the SSc ICD-9 and ICD-10-CM codes, keyword search for Raynaud’s phenomenon, and positive ANA (≥ 1:80). The highest performing algorithm was internally validated in a set of 100 subjects who were not part of the original training set
Fig. 1 Development of algorithms to identify patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) in the electronic health record (EHR). At least a 1-time count of the SSc ICD-9 code (710.1) or ICD-10-CM codes (M34*) was applied to the 3 million subjects in Vanderbilt’s Synthetic Derivative, which resulted in 1899 potential SSc cases. Of these 1899 potential SSc cases, 200 were randomly selected for a training set to develop and test algorithms with various combinations of the SSc ICD-9 and ICD-10-CM codes, keyword search for Raynaud’s phenomenon, and positive ANA (≥ 1:80). The highest performing algorithm was internally validated in a set of 100 subjects who were not part of the original training setCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jamian, L., Wheless, L., Crofford, L. J., & Barnado, A.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Barnado, April
Venue
Arthritis Research & Therapy
Published
2019-12
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
305-305
ISSN
  • 1478-6354 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-6362
OpenAlex
W2997101676
Cited by
57
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Arthritis Research & Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD 5K12HD043483-12)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (1 K08AR072757-01)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1 RR024975)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (ULTR000445)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
systemic sclerosis, electronic health records, patient identification algorithm, ICD-10-CM codes, ICD-9 codes, billing codes, antinuclear antibodies, Raynaud's phenomenon, random forest, rule-based algorithm, rare diseases, positive predictive value, sensitivity and specificity, chart review validation, clinical data integration, health information exchange
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Scleroderma, Systemic, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, International Classification of Diseases, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review