Cited by 10Health and Medical Research ImpactsAcademic Writing and PublishingHealth Sciences Research and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

“Publish or Perish”: barriers to research publication in an undergraduate medical research program

Open access
Alsulami, Abdulrahman F, Khaimi, Zeyad O, Hadi, Mohammed A, Aljabri, Yazeed H, Mayet, Talha S, Althubaiti, Alaa·2023·BMC Research Notes

Abstract

Objectives: Publication is one of the crucial parameters in research, and the inability to publish has been noted in many medical students’ projects due to different reasons. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the obstacles that prevented medical students in a health science university from publishing their research from 2018 to 2021. First, an online survey was distributed to assess the obstacles to publication perceived by the medical students. Second, a total of 81 research projects were evaluated by scientific reviewers and their final decision about the publication was recorded. Results: In total, 162 students filled out the survey. The barriers faced by the students were various. They included an unsupportive research supervisor, a lack of time, an insufficient sample size, and many others. In the reviewer’s evaluation, out of 81 projects, 70 projects (86.4%) were recommended to be published after minor or major modifications, while 11 projects (13.6%) were rejected due to poor writing style, poor results interpretation, and incorrect methodology. Conclusion: Articulating the barriers to undergraduate medical research publication is important in boosting publication rates and research experience of graduating medical students. Medical research educators and research supervisors should strongly consider creating a framework that tackles existing obstacles and any future matters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13104-023-06542-5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 16 · Cited by 10

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Rosenberg WMC, Sackett DL. On the need for evidence-based medicine. J Public Heal Med. 1995;17:330–4. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45160659. Accessed 2 Oct 2022.
  2. Griffin MF, Hindocha S. Publication practices of medical students at british medical schools: experience, attitudes and barriers to publish. Med Teach. 2011;33. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.530320. · DOI
  3. Aslam F, Shakir M, Qayyum MA. Why medical students are crucial to the future of Research in South Asia. PLoS Med. 2005;2:1110–1. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.0020322. · DOI
  4. Alsaleem SA, Alkhairi MAY, Alzahrani MAA, Alwadai MI, Alqahtani SSA, Alaseri YFY, et al. Challenges and Barriers toward Medical Research among Medical and Dental students at King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Front Public Heal. 2021;9. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2021.706778. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cursiefen C, Altunbas A. Contribution of medical student research to the MedlineTM-indexed publications of a german medical faculty. Med Educ. 1998;32:439–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2923.1998.00255.X. · DOI
  6. Alsayed N, Eldeek B, Tayeb S, Ayuob N, Al-Harbi A. Research practices and publication obstacles among interns at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 2011–2012. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2012;87:64–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.EPX.0000417978.44502.61. · DOI
  7. Chellaiyan VG, Manoharan A, Jasmine M, Liaquathali F. Medical research: perception and barriers to its practice among medical school students of Chennai. J Educ Health Promot. 2019;8. https://doi.org/10.4103/JEHP.JEHP_464_18. · DOI
  8. Arriola-Quiroz I, Curioso WH, Cruz-Encarnacion M, Gayoso O. Characteristics and publication patterns of theses from a peruvian medical school. Health Info Libr J. 2010;27:148–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1471-1842.2010.00878.X. · DOI
  9. Althubaiti A. Undergraduate Medical Research Programme: a cross-sectional study of students’ Satisfactions, Perceived Challenges, and attitudes. Glob J Health Sci. 2015;7:117. https://doi.org/10.5539/GJHS.V7N5P117. · DOI
  10. Menon V, Varadharajan N, Praharaj SK, Ameen S. Why do manuscripts get rejected? A content analysis of rejection reports from the Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine. Indian J Psychol Med. 2022;44:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620965845. · DOI
  11. Soe HHK, Than NN, Lwin H, Htay MNNN, Phyu KL, Abas AL. Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers toward research: the perspectives of undergraduate medical and dental students. J Educ Health Promot. 2018;7:23. https://doi.org/10.4103/JEHP.JEHP_61_17. · DOI
  12. Althubaiti A. Attitudes of Medical Students toward Statistics in Medical Research: evidence from Saudi Arabia. J Stat Data Sci Educ. 2021;29:115–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1850220. · DOI
  13. Althubaiti A, Al Muqbil B, Al Buraikan D. Assessment of Medical Students’ attitudes towards Research and Perceived Barriers. Int J Med Students. 2017;5:95–8. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2017.28. Accessed 4 Oct 2022. · DOI
  14. Althubaiti A, Althubaiti SM. Medical research: what to expect in a student–supervisor relationship. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12909-022-03851-4. · DOI
  15. Althubaiti A. Sample size determination: a practical guide for health researchers. J Gen Fam Med. 2022;24:72–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/JGF2.600. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Alsulami, A. F., Khaimi, Z. O., Hadi, M. A., Aljabri, Y. H., Mayet, T. S., & Althubaiti, A.
Affiliations
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA)
Corresponding author
Althubaiti, Alaa
Venue
BMC Research Notes
Published
2023-10-13
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
269-269
ISSN
1756-0500 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387616311
Cited by
10
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Research Notes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Science
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
undergraduate medical research, medical students, publish or perish, research supervision, publication rates, research training, sample size limitations
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Personnel, Students, Medical, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review