Cited by 28Epigenetics and DNA MethylationTesticular diseases and treatmentsCancer-related gene regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential methylation EPIC analysis discloses cisplatin-resistance related hypermethylation and tumor-specific heterogeneity within matched primary and metastatic testicular germ cell tumor patient tissue samples

Open access
Lobo, João, Constâncio, Vera, Leite-Silva, Pedro, Guimarães, Rita, Cantante, Mariana, Braga, Isaac, Maurício, Joaquina, Looijenga, Leendert H. J., Henrique, Rui, Jerónimo, Carmen·2021·Clinical Epigenetics

Abstract

Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) are among the most common solid malignancies in young-adult men, and currently most mortality is due to metastatic disease and emergence of resistance to cisplatin. There is some evidence that increased methylation is one mechanism behind this resistance, stemming from individual studies, but approaches based on matched primary and metastatic patient samples are lacking. Herein, we provide an EPIC array-based study of matched primary and metastatic TGCT samples. Histology was the major determinant of overall methylation pattern, but some clustering of samples related to response to cisplatin was observed. Further differential analysis of patients with the same histological subtype (embryonal carcinoma) disclosed a remarkable increase in net methylation levels (at both promoter and CpG site level) in the patient with cisplatin-resistant disease and poor outcome compared to the patient with complete response to chemotherapy. This further confirms the recent results of another study performed on isogenic clones of sensitive and resistant TGCT cell lines. Differentially methylated promoters among groups of samples were mostly not shared, disclosing heterogeneity in patient tissue samples. Finally, gene ontology analysis of cisplatin-resistant samples indicated enrichment of differentially hypermethylated promoters on pathways related to regulation of immune microenvironment, and enrichment of differentially hypomethylated promoters on pathways related to DNA/chromatin binding and regulation. This data supports not only the use of hypomethylating agents for targeting cisplatin-resistant disease, but also their use in combination with immunotherapies and chromatin remodelers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13148-021-01048-y

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epigenetic reprogramming is a major pathway of resistance in various tumor types, including TGCTs, particularly in the cisplatin-resistant setting, which is characterized by enrichment of differentially hypermethylated promoters on pathways related to regulation of the immune microenvironment.

    “Epigenetic reprogramming consists of a major pathway of resistance in various tumor types, including TGCTs, particularly in the cisplatin-resistant setting which is characterized by the enrichment of differentially hypermethylated promoters on pathways related to the regulation of the immune microenvironment [77].”

    From The Immune Landscape and Immunotherapeutic Strategies in Platinum-Refractory Testicular Germ Cell Tumors (2024) · cites this paper as [77]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Lobo J, Gillis AJM, Jeronimo C, Henrique R, Looijenga LHJ. Human germ cell tumors are developmental cancers: impact of epigenetics on pathobiology and clinic. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(2):65. · DOI
  2. Oosterhuis JW, Looijenga LHJ. Human germ cell tumours from a developmental perspective. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19(9):522–37. · DOI
  3. Honecker F, Aparicio J, Berney D, Beyer J, Bokemeyer C, Cathomas R, et al. ESMO consensus conference on testicular germ cell cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(8):1658–86. · DOI
  4. Lakshminarasimhan R, Liang G. The role of DNA methylation in cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;945:151–72. · DOI
  5. Constancio V, Nunes SP, Henrique R, Jeronimo C. DNA methylation-based testing in liquid biopsies as detection and prognostic biomarkers for the four major cancer types. Cells. 2020;9(3):558. · DOI
  6. Levenson VV. DNA methylation as a universal biomarker. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2010;10(4):481–8. · DOI
  7. Rijlaarsdam MA, Tax DM, Gillis AJ, Dorssers LC, Koestler DC, de Ridder J, et al. Genome wide DNA methylation profiles provide clues to the origin and pathogenesis of germ cell tumors. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0122146. · DOI
  8. Noor DAM, Jeyapalan JN, Alhazmi S, Carr M, Squibb B, Wallace C, et al. Genome-wide methylation analysis identifies genes silenced in non-seminoma cell lines. NPJ Genom Med. 2016;1:15009. · DOI
  9. van der Zwan YG, Rijlaarsdam MA, Rossello FJ, Notini AJ, de Boer S, Watkins DN, et al. Seminoma and embryonal carcinoma footprints identified by analysis of integrated genome-wide epigenetic and expression profiles of germ cell cancer cell lines. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e98330. · DOI
  10. Shen H, Shih J, Hollern DP, Wang L, Bowlby R, Tickoo SK, et al. Integrated molecular characterization of testicular germ cell tumors. Cell Rep. 2018;23(11):3392–406. · DOI
  11. Killian JK, Dorssers LC, Trabert B, Gillis AJ, Cook MB, Wang Y, et al. Imprints and DPPA3 are bypassed during pluripotency- and differentiation-coupled methylation reprogramming in testicular germ cell tumors. Genome Res. 2016;26(11):1490–504. · DOI
  12. Cheung HH, Yang Y, Lee TL, Rennert O, Chan WY. Hypermethylation of genes in testicular embryonal carcinomas. Br J Cancer. 2016;114(2):230–6. · DOI
  13. Dorssers LCJ, Gillis AJM, Stoop H, van Marion R, Nieboer MM, van Riet J, et al. Molecular heterogeneity and early metastatic clone selection in testicular germ cell cancer development. Br J Cancer. 2019;120(4):444–52. · DOI
  14. Fazal Z, Singh R, Fang F, Bikorimana E, Baldwin H, Corbet A, et al. Hypermethylation and global remodelling of DNA methylation is associated with acquired cisplatin resistance in testicular germ cell tumours. Epigenetics. 2020;66:1–14.
  15. Singh R, Fazal Z, Corbet AK, Bikorimana E, Rodriguez JC, Khan EM, et al. Epigenetic remodeling through downregulation of polycomb repressive complex 2 mediates chemotherapy resistance in testicular germ cell tumors. Cancers. 2019;11(6):148. · DOI
  16. Jacobsen C, Honecker F. Cisplatin resistance in germ cell tumours: models and mechanisms. Andrology. 2015;3(1):111–21. · DOI
  17. Wermann H, Stoop H, Gillis AJ, Honecker F, van Gurp RJ, Ammerpohl O, et al. Global DNA methylation in fetal human germ cells and germ cell tumours: association with differentiation and cisplatin resistance. J Pathol. 2010;221(4):433–42. · DOI
  18. Bakardjieva-Mihaylova V, Skvarova Kramarzova K, Slamova M, Svaton M, Rejlova K, Zaliova M, et al. Molecular basis of cisplatin resistance in testicular germ cell tumors. Cancers. 2019;11(9):253. · DOI
  19. Cheng ML, Donoghue MTA, Audenet F, Wong NC, Pietzak EJ, Bielski CM, et al. Germ cell tumor molecular heterogeneity revealed through analysis of primary and metastasis pairs. JCO Precis Oncol. 2020;4:25.
  20. Barrett MT, Lenkiewicz E, Malasi S, Stanton M, Slack J, Andrews P, et al. Clonal analyses of refractory testicular germ cell tumors. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(3):e0213815. · DOI
  21. Necchi A, Bratslavsky G, Corona RJ, Chung JH, Millis SZ, Elvin JA, et al. Genomic characterization of testicular germ cell tumors relapsing after chemotherapy. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(1):122–30. · DOI
  22. Loveday C, Litchfield K, Proszek PZ, Cornish AJ, Santo F, Levy M, et al. Genomic landscape of platinum resistant and sensitive testicular cancers. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2189. · DOI
  23. Roška J, Wachsmannová L, Hurbanová L, Šestáková Z, Mueller T, Jurkovičová D, et al. Differential gene expression in cisplatin-resistant and -sensitive testicular germ cell tumor cell lines. Oncotarget. 2020;11(51):56. · DOI
  24. Lobo J, Costa AL, Vilela-Salgueiro B, Rodrigues A, Guimaraes R, Cantante M, et al. Testicular germ cell tumors: revisiting a series in light of the new WHO classification and AJCC staging systems, focusing on challenges for pathologists. Hum Pathol. 2018;82:113–24. · DOI
  25. Muller F, Scherer M, Assenov Y, Lutsik P, Walter J, Lengauer T, et al. RnBeads 2.0: comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation data. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):55. · DOI
  26. de Vries G, Rosas-Plaza X, van Vugt M, Gietema JA, de Jong S. Testicular cancer: determinants of cisplatin sensitivity and novel therapeutic opportunities. Cancer Treat Rev. 2020;88:102054. · DOI
  27. Schmidtova S, Kalavska K, Kucerova L. Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin chemoresistance and its circumventing in testicular germ cell tumors. Curr Oncol Rep. 2018;20(11):88. · DOI
  28. Koster R, van Vugt MA, Timmer-Bosscha H, Gietema JA, de Jong S. Unravelling mechanisms of cisplatin sensitivity and resistance in testicular cancer. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2013;15:e12. · DOI
  29. Mayer F, Honecker F, Looijenga LH, Bokemeyer C. Towards an understanding of the biological basis of response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in germ-cell tumors. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(6):825–32. · DOI
  30. Singh R, Fazal Z, Freemantle SJ, Spinella MJ. Mechanisms of cisplatin sensitivity and resistance in testicular germ cell tumors. Cancer Drug Resist. 2019;2(3):580–94.
  31. Koul S, McKiernan JM, Narayan G, Houldsworth J, Bacik J, Dobrzynski DL, et al. Role of promoter hypermethylation in Cisplatin treatment response of male germ cell tumors. Mol Cancer. 2004;3:16. · DOI
  32. Martinelli C, Lengert AVH, Carcano FM, Silva ECA, Brait M, Lopes LF, et al. MGMT and CALCA promoter methylation are associated with poor prognosis in testicular germ cell tumor patients. Oncotarget. 2017;8(31):50608–17. · DOI
  33. Roska J, Jurkovicova D. Understanding the crosstalk of molecular factors and signaling pathways reveals novel biomarkers of cisplatin resistance in testicular germ cell tumors. Neoplasma. 2020;67(1):1–14. · DOI
  34. Beyrouthy MJ, Garner KM, Hever MP, Freemantle SJ, Eastman A, Dmitrovsky E, et al. High DNA methyltransferase 3B expression mediates 5-aza-deoxycytidine hypersensitivity in testicular germ cell tumors. Cancer Res. 2009;69(24):9360–6. · DOI
  35. Biswal BK, Beyrouthy MJ, Hever-Jardine MP, Armstrong D, Tomlinson CR, Christensen BC, et al. Acute hypersensitivity of pluripotent testicular cancer-derived embryonal carcinoma to low-dose 5-aza deoxycytidine is associated with global DNA Damage-associated p53 activation, anti-pluripotency and DNA demethylation. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e53003. · DOI
  36. Albany C, Hever-Jardine MP, von Herrmann KM, Yim CY, Tam J, Warzecha JM, et al. Refractory testicular germ cell tumors are highly sensitive to the second generation DNA methylation inhibitor guadecitabine. Oncotarget. 2017;8(2):2949–59. · DOI
  37. Oing C, Verem I, Mansour WY, Bokemeyer C, Dyshlovoy S, Honecker F. 5-Azacitidine exerts prolonged pro-apoptotic effects and overcomes cisplatin-resistance in non-seminomatous germ cell tumor cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;20(1):56. · DOI
  38. Albany C, Fazal Z, Singh R, Bikorimana E, Adra N, Hanna NH, et al. A phase 1 study of combined guadecitabine and cisplatin in platinum refractory germ cell cancer. Cancer Med. 2020;5:66.
  39. Adra N, Einhorn LH, Althouse SK, Ammakkanavar NR, Musapatika D, Albany C, et al. Phase II trial of pembrolizumab in patients with platinum refractory germ-cell tumors: a Hoosier Cancer Research Network Study GU14-206. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(1):209–14. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Lobo J, Rodrigues A, Guimaraes R, Cantante M, Lopes P, Mauricio J, et al. Detailed characterization of immune cell infiltrate and expression of immune checkpoint molecules PD-L1/CTLA-4 and MMR proteins in testicular germ cell tumors disclose novel disease biomarkers. Cancers. 2019;11(10):8568. · DOI · Paper page
  41. Lobo J, Jeronimo C, Henrique R. Targeting the immune system and epigenetic landscape of urological tumors. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(3):568. · DOI
  42. Jostes S, Nettersheim D, Schorle H. Epigenetic drugs and their molecular targets in testicular germ cell tumours. Nat Rev Urol. 2019;16(4):245–59. · DOI
  43. Cardoso AR, Lobo J, Miranda-Goncalves V, Henrique R, Jeronimo C. Epigenetic alterations as therapeutic targets in Testicular Germ Cell Tumours: current and future application of “epidrugs.” Epigenetic 2020;56:1–20

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lobo, J., Constâncio, V., Leite-Silva, P., Guimarães, R., Cantante, M., Braga, I., Maurício, J., Looijenga, L. H. J., Henrique, R., & Jerónimo, C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • IPO Porto (PT)
  • Princess Máxima Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Henrique, Rui
Venue
Clinical Epigenetics
Published
2021-04-06
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
70-70
ISSN
  • 1868-7075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-7083
OpenAlex
W3148328959
Cited by
28
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Epigenetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PTDC/MECONC/ 29043/2017, SFRH/BD/132751/2017)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Testicular diseases and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer-related gene regulation
Keywords
testicular germ cell tumors, cisplatin resistance, DNA methylation, promoter hypermethylation, metastatic cancer, embryonal carcinoma, tumor heterogeneity, immune microenvironment, hypomethylating agents, combination immunotherapy, chromatin remodeling, histological subtypes
MeSH terms
Adult, Antineoplastic Agents, Cisplatin, Humans, Male, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal, Testicular Neoplasms, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Treatment Outcome, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, DNA Methylation, Cell Line, Tumor, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review