Cited by 33Epigenetics and DNA MethylationBirth, Development, and HealthTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

Evaluation of pediatric epigenetic clocks across multiple tissues

Open access
Fang, Fang, Zhou, Linran, Perng, Wei, Marsit, Carmen J., Knight, Anna K., Cardenas, Andres, Aung, Max T., Hivert, Marie-France +91 more·2023·Clinical Epigenetics

Abstract

Background: Epigenetic clocks are promising tools for assessing biological age. We assessed the accuracy of pediatric epigenetic clocks in gestational and chronological age determination. Results: Our study used data from seven tissue types on three DNA methylation profiling microarrays and found that the Knight and Bohlin clocks performed similarly for blood cells, while the Lee clock was superior for placental samples. The pediatric-buccal-epigenetic clock performed the best for pediatric buccal samples, while the Horvath clock is recommended for children's blood cell samples. The NeoAge clock stands out for its unique ability to predict post-menstrual age with high correlation with the observed age in infant buccal cell samples. Conclusions: Our findings provide valuable guidance for future research and development of epigenetic clocks in pediatric samples, enabling more accurate assessments of biological age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13148-023-01552-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 33

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [1]Santos KF Mazzola TN Carvalho HF The prima donna of epigenetics: the regulation of gene expression by DNA methylation Braz J Med Biol Res 2005 38 10 1531 1541 10.1590/S0100-879X2005001000010 16172746 · DOI
  2. [2]Nishiyama A Nakanishi M Navigating the DNA methylation landscape of cancer Trends Genet 2021 37 11 1012 1027 10.1016/j.tig.2021.05.002 34120771 · DOI
  3. [3]Wu YL Lin ZJ Li CC Lin X Shan SK Guo B Zheng MH Li F Yuan LQ Li ZH Epigenetic regulation in metabolic diseases: mechanisms and advances in clinical study Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023 8 1 98 10.1038/s41392-023-01333-7 36864020 PMC9981733 · DOI
  4. [4]Noroozi R Ghafouri-Fard S Pisarek A Rudnicka J Spolnicka M Branicki W Taheri M Pospiech E DNA methylation-based age clocks: from age prediction to age reversion Ageing Res Rev 2021 68 101314 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101314 33684551 · DOI
  5. [5]Horvath S Raj K DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing Nat Rev Genet 2018 19 6 371 384 10.1038/s41576-018-0004-3 29643443 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [6]Di Lena P Sala C Nardini C Evaluation of different computational methods for DNA methylation-based biological age Brief Bioinform 2022 23 4 bbac274 10.1093/bib/bbac274 35794713 · DOI
  7. [7]Horvath S DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types Genome Biol 2013 14 10 R115 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115 24138928 PMC4015143 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [8]Knight AK Craig JM Theda C Baekvad-Hansen M Bybjerg-Grauholm J Hansen CS Hollegaard MV Hougaard DM Mortensen PB Weinsheimer SM An epigenetic clock for gestational age at birth based on blood methylation data Genome Biol 2016 17 1 206 10.1186/s13059-016-1068-z 27717399 PMC5054584 · DOI
  9. [9]Bohlin J Haberg SE Magnus P Reese SE Gjessing HK Magnus MC Parr CL Page CM London SJ Nystad W Prediction of gestational age based on genome-wide differentially methylated regions Genome Biol 2016 17 1 207 10.1186/s13059-016-1063-4 27717397 PMC5054559 · DOI
  10. [10]Lee Y Choufani S Weksberg R Wilson SL Yuan V Burt A Marsit C Lu AT Ritz B Bohlin J Placental epigenetic clocks: estimating gestational age using placental DNA methylation levels Aging (Albany NY) 2019 11 12 4238 4253 10.18632/aging.102049 31235674 PMC6628997 · DOI
  11. [11]Mayne BT Leemaqz SY Smith AK Breen J Roberts CT Bianco-Miotto T Accelerated placental aging in early onset preeclampsia pregnancies identified by DNA methylation Epigenomics 2017 9 3 279 289 10.2217/epi-2016-0103 27894195 PMC6040051 · DOI
  12. [12]McEwen LM O'Donnell KJ McGill MG Edgar RD Jones MJ MacIsaac JL Lin DTS Ramadori K Morin A Gladish N The PedBE clock accurately estimates DNA methylation age in pediatric buccal cells Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2020 117 38 23329 23335 10.1073/pnas.1820843116 31611402 PMC7519312 · DOI
  13. [13]Graw S Camerota M Carter BS Helderman J Hofheimer JA McGowan EC Neal CR Pastyrnak SL Smith LM DellaGrotta SA NEOage clocks—epigenetic clocks to estimate post-menstrual and postnatal age in preterm infants Aging (Albany NY) 2021 13 20 23527 23544 10.18632/aging.203637 34655469 PMC8580352 · DOI
  14. [14]Knapp EA Kress AM Parker CB Page GP McArthur K Gachigi KK Alshawabkeh AN Aschner JL Bastain TM Breton CV The environmental influences on child health outcomes (ECHO)-wide cohort Am J Epidemiol 2023 192 8 1249 1263 10.1093/aje/kwad071 36963379 PMC10403303 · DOI
  15. [15]Aryee MJ Jaffe AE Corrada-Bravo H Ladd-Acosta C Feinberg AP Hansen KD Irizarry RA Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays Bioinformatics 2014 30 10 1363 1369 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu049 24478339 PMC4016708 · DOI
  16. [16]Chen YA Lemire M Choufani S Butcher DT Grafodatskaya D Zanke BW Gallinger S Hudson TJ Weksberg R Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray Epigenetics 2013 8 2 203 209 10.4161/epi.23470 23314698 PMC3592906 · DOI
  17. [17]Triche TJ Jr Weisenberger DJ Van Den Berg D Laird PW Siegmund KD Low-level processing of Illumina Infinium DNA methylation BeadArrays Nucleic Acids Res 2013 41 7 e90 10.1093/nar/gkt090 23476028 PMC3627582 · DOI
  18. [18]Yuan V Price EM Del Gobbo G Mostafavi S Cox B Binder AM Michels KB Marsit C Robinson WP Accurate ethnicity prediction from placental DNA methylation data Epigenet Chromatin 2019 12 1 51 10.1186/s13072-019-0296-3 PMC6688210 31399127 · DOI
  19. [19]Xu Z Niu L Li L Taylor JA ENmix: a novel background correction method for Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip Nucleic Acids Res 2016 44 3 e20 10.1093/nar/gkv907 26384415 PMC4756845 · DOI
  20. [20]Ladd-Acosta C Vang E Barrett ES Bulka CM Bush NR Cardenas A Dabelea D Dunlop AL Fry RC Gao X Analysis of pregnancy complications and epigenetic gestational age of newborns JAMA Netw Open 2023 6 2 e230672 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0672 36826815 PMC9958528 · DOI
  21. [21]McEwen LM Jones MJ Lin DTS Edgar RD Husquin LT MacIsaac JL Ramadori KE Morin AM Rider CF Carlsten C Systematic evaluation of DNA methylation age estimation with common preprocessing methods and the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array Clin Epigenet 2018 10 1 123 10.1186/s13148-018-0556-2 PMC6192219 30326963 · DOI
  22. [22]Crimmins EM Thyagarajan B Levine ME Weir DR Faul J Associations of age, sex, race/ethnicity, and education with 13 epigenetic clocks in a nationally representative US sample: the Health and Retirement Study J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2021 76 6 1117 1123 10.1093/gerona/glab016 33453106 PMC8140049 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [24]Knight AK Smith AK Conneely KN Dalach P Loke YJ Cheong JL Davis PG Craig JM Doyle LW Theda C Relationship between epigenetic maturity and respiratory morbidity in preterm infants J Pediatr 2018 198 168–173 e162 PMC6261285 29705119
  24. [25]Clark J Bulka CM Martin CL Roell K Santos HP O'Shea TM Smeester L Fry R Dhingra R Placental epigenetic gestational aging in relation to maternal sociodemographic factors and smoking among infants born extremely preterm: a descriptive study Epigenetics 2022 17 13 2389 2403 10.1080/15592294.2022.2125717 36134874 PMC9665142 · DOI
  25. [26]Wang X Cho HY Campbell MR Panduri V Coviello S Caballero MT Sambandan D Kleeberger SR Polack FP Ofman G Epigenome-wide association study of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants: results from the discovery-BPD program Clin Epigenet 2022 14 1 57 10.1186/s13148-022-01272-0 PMC9052529 35484630 · DOI

Authors
Fang, F., Zhou, L., Perng, W., Marsit, C. J., Knight, A. K., Cardenas, A., Aung, M. T., Hivert, M.-F., Aris, I. M., Goodrich, J. M., Smith, A. K., Gaylord, A., Fry, R. C., Oken, E., O’Connor, G., Ruden, D. M., Trasande, L., Herbstman, J. B., Camargo, C. A., Bush, N. R., Dunlop, A. L., Dabelea, D. M., Karagas, M. R., Breton, C. V., Ober, C., Everson, T. M., Page, G. P., Ladd-Acosta, C., Outcomes, O. B. O. P. C. F. E. I. O. C. H., Smith, P. B., Newby, L. K., Jacobson, L. P., Catellier, D. J., Gershon, R., Cella, D., Laham, F. R., Mansbach, J. M., Wu, S., Spergel, J. M., Celedón, J. C., Puls, H. T., Teach, S. J., Porter, S. C., Waynik, I. Y., Iyer, S. S., Samuels-Kalow, M. E., D.Thompson, A., Stevenson, M. D., Bauer, C. S., Inhofe, N. R., Boos, M., Macias, C. G., Gern, J., Jackson, D., Bacharier, L., Kattan, M., Wood, R., Rivera-Spoljaric, K., Bacharier, L., Bastain, T., Farzan, S., Habre, R., Karr, C., Tylavsky, F., Mason, A., Zhao, Q., Sathyanarayana, S., Bush, N., LeWinn, K. Z., Lester, B., Carter, B., Pastyrnak, S., Neal, C., Smith, L., Helderman, J., McEvoy, C., Tepper, R., Lyall, K., Volk, H., Schmidt, R., Croen, L., O’Shea, M., Vaidya, R., Obeid, R., Rollins, C., Bear, K., Pastyrnak, S., Lenski, M., Singh, R., Msall, M., Frazier, J., Gogcu, S., Montgomery, A., Kuban, K., Douglass, L., Jara, H., Joseph, R., Kerver, J. M., & Perera, F.
Affiliations
  • RTI International (US)
  • Colorado School of Public Health (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Fang, Fang
Venue
Clinical Epigenetics
Published
2023-09-02
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
142-142
ISSN
  • 1868-7075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-7083
OpenAlex
W4386387132
Cited by
33
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Epigenetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Center for Clinical and Translational Research (KL2-TR002534)
  • NIH Office of the Director (R01MD009064, UH3OD023286, UH3OD023305, UH3OD023290, UH3OD023253, R01DK076648, UH3OD023275, UH3OD023287)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
epigenetic clocks, biological age, DNA methylation, gestational age estimation, chronological age estimation, Horvath clock, buccal epithelial cells, placental tissue, blood cells, tissue comparison
MeSH terms
Child, Female, Humans, Infant, Placenta, Pregnancy, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic, Epigenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review