Cited by 81Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Further analyses of the safety of verubecestat in the phase 3 EPOCH trial of mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Egan, Michael F., Mukai, Yuki, Voss, Tiffini, Kost, James, Stone, Julie, Furtek, Christine, Mahoney, Erin, Cummings, Jeffrey L. +5 more·2019·Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Verubecestat, a BACE1 inhibitor that reduces Aβ levels in the cerebrospinal fluid of humans, was not effective in a phase 3 trial (EPOCH) of mild-to-moderate AD and was associated with adverse events. To assist in the development of BACE1 inhibitors, we report detailed safety findings from EPOCH. METHODS: EPOCH was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 78-week trial evaluating verubecestat 12 mg and 40 mg in participants with mild-to-moderate AD diagnosed clinically. The trial was terminated due to futility close to its scheduled completion. Of 1957 participants who were randomized and took treatment, 652 were assigned to verubecestat 12 mg, 652 to verubecestat 40 mg, and 653 to placebo. Adverse events and relevant laboratory, vital sign, and ECG findings were assessed. RESULTS: Verubecestat 12 mg and 40 mg were associated with an increase in the percentage of participants reporting adverse events versus placebo (89 and 92% vs. 82%), although relatively few participants discontinued treatment due to adverse events (8 and 9% vs. 6%). Adverse events that were increased versus placebo included falls and injuries, suicidal ideation, weight loss, sleep disturbance, rash, and hair color change. Most were mild to moderate in severity. Treatment differences in suicidal ideation emerged within the first 3 months but did not appear to increase after 6 months. In contrast, treatment differences in falls and injuries continued to increase over time. CONCLUSIONS: Verubecestat was associated with increased risk for several types of adverse events. Falls and injuries were notable for progressive increases over time. While the mechanisms underlying the increased adverse events are unclear, they may be due to BACE inhibition and should be considered in future clinical development programs of BACE1 inhibitors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01739348 , registered on 29 November 2012.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13195-019-0520-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inadequate efficacy and/or severe side effects in clinical trials with BACE1 inhibitors such as Verubecestat and Atabecestat have been reported.

    “Similarly, inadequate efficacy and/or severe side effects in clinical trials with BACE1 inhibitors such as Verubecestat and Atabecestat [638–640] have also been reported.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 81

Authors
Egan, M. F., Mukai, Y., Voss, T., Kost, J., Stone, J., Furtek, C., Mahoney, E., Cummings, J. L., Tariot, P. N., Aisen, P. S., Vellas, B., Lines, C., & Michelson, D.
Affiliations
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Banner Alzheimer’s Institute (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Egan, Michael F.
Venue
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Published
2019-08-07
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
68-68
ISSN
1758-9193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964825595
Cited by
81
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 7
FWCI
6.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s Research & Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Scholarship - UNLV (University of Nevada Reno) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Merck
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
verubecestat, BACE1 inhibitors, Alzheimer's disease, drug safety, adverse events, falls and injuries, suicidal ideation, dose comparison
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cyclic S-Oxides, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Thiadiazines, Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases, Treatment Outcome, Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review