The effect of amyloid deposition on longitudinal resting-state functional connectivity in cognitively normal older adults
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Pathological processes contributing to Alzheimer's disease begin decades prior to the onset of clinical symptoms. There is significant variation in cognitive changes in the presence of pathology, functional connectivity may be a marker of compensation to amyloid; however, this is not well understood. METHODS: We recruited 64 cognitively normal older adults who underwent neuropsychological testing and biannual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), amyloid imaging with Pittsburgh compound B (PiB)-PET, and glucose metabolism (FDG)-PET imaging for up to 6 years. Resting-state MRI was used to estimate connectivity of seven canonical neural networks using template-based rotation. Using voxel-wise paired t-tests, we identified neural networks that displayed significant changes in connectivity across time. We investigated associations among amyloid and longitudinal changes in connectivity and cognitive function by domains. RESULTS: Left middle frontal gyrus connectivity within the memory encoding network increased over time, but the rate of change was lower with greater amyloid. This was no longer significant in an analysis where we limited the sample to only those with two time points. We found limited decline in cognitive domains overall. Greater functional connectivity was associated with better attention/processing speed and executive function (independent of time) in those with lower amyloid but was associated with worse function with greater amyloid. CONCLUSIONS: Increased functional connectivity serves to preserve cognitive function in normal aging and may fail in the presence of pathology consistent with compensatory models.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The relation between regional Aβ burden and WMHs' effect on future EF change might be explained by WMHs' impacts on connectivity within the executive control and default mode networks.
“These data suggest that this relation might be explained by WMHs’ impacts on connectivity within the executive control, and default mode networks [44].”
From Amyloid-PET and White Matter Hyperintensities Have Independent Effects on Baseline Cognitive Function and Synergistic Effects on Longitudinal Executive Function (2023) · cites this paper as [44]
The Results (page unavailable) link amyloid, connectivity, and executive function, while the Introduction discusses amyloid-related default mode connectivity. They do not show that WMHs affect connectivity within the executive control or default mode networks, or that such an effect explains future executive-function change. In Table 2, the time-by-WMH interaction for the connectivity measured was not significant. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 19
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [10]Elman JA Madison CM Baker SL Effects of beta-amyloid on resting state functional connectivity within and between networks reflect known patterns of regional vulnerability Cereb Cortex 2014 26 695 707 25405944 PMC4712800
- Authors
- Lin, C., Ly, M., Karim, H. T., Wei, W., Snitz, B. E., Klunk, W. E., & Aizenstein, H. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Aizenstein, Howard J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
- Published
- 2020-01-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-7
- ISSN
- 1758-9193 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6945413
- OpenAlex
- W3005516081
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Alzheimer s Research & Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (P50 AG005133, RF1 AG025516, P01 AG025204, 5K23AG038479, NIA T32 AG021885)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH076079, NIMH T32 MH019986)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- amyloid deposition, resting-state functional connectivity, longitudinal change, cognitively normal older adults, Alzheimer's disease, compensatory model, middle frontal gyrus, executive function, attention and processing speed, cognitive aging, Pittsburgh compound B PET
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Brain, Cognition, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Rest, Positron-Emission Tomography, Amyloidogenic Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review