Modified CBT for social anxiety and social functioning in young adults with autism spectrum disorder
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a strong research imperative to investigate effective treatment options for adolescents and adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Elevated social anxiety, difficulties with social functioning and poor mental health have all been identified as core treatment targets for this group. While theoretical models posit a strong bidirectionality between social anxiety and ASD social functioning deficits, few interventions have targeted both domains concurrently. Of the two group interventions previously conducted with adolescents and adults with ASD, significant results have only been observed in either social anxiety or social functioning, and have not generalised to changes in overall mood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefit, tolerability and acceptability of a group cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT) intervention in young adults with ASD. Primary treatment outcomes were social anxiety symptoms and social functioning difficulties; secondary outcomes were self-reported mood and overall distress. METHOD: Ten groups of participants completed an eight-week, modified group CBT intervention targeting both social anxiety and social functioning, that included social skills training, exposure tasks and behavioural experiment components. Seventy-eight adolescents and young adults with ASD, without intellectual impairment, aged between 16 and 38 (M = 22.77; SD = 5.31), were recruited from the community, Headspace centres and the Autism Clinic for Translational Research at the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney. Outcomes (social anxiety, social functioning and mood) were measured pre- and post-intervention via self-report questionnaires (administered either online or through the return of hard-copy booklets), and participants were invited to provide anonymous feedback on the intervention (at the mid-point and end of the intervention). RESULTS: Participants demonstrated statistically significant improvements on all outcome measures in response to the intervention. Specifically, social anxiety symptoms decreased (p < .001), and specific subdomains of social functioning improved post-intervention, particularly in social motivation (p = .032) and restricted interests and repetitive behaviours (p = .025). Self-reported symptom improvements also generalised to mood (depression, anxiety and stress; p < .05). All improvements demonstrated small effect sizes. Participant feedback was positive and indicated strong satisfaction with the program. LIMITATIONS: The absence of a control group and follow-up measures, reliance on self-report instruments as outcome measures and the exclusion of those with intellectual disability represent significant limitations to this study. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that a group CBT intervention appears to be a beneficial intervention for self-reported social anxiety, social functioning and overall mental health in adolescents and young adults with ASD. The stand-alone nature of the intervention combined with positive participant feedback indicates it was well tolerated, has potential clinical utility and warrants further study in a randomised-controlled, follow-up design.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A subsequent qualitative study using a subset of the sample demonstrated that the intervention was viewed positively by most participants.
“A subsequent qualitative study39 using a subset of the sample demonstrated that the intervention was viewed positively by most participants.”
From Approaches to improving mental healthcare for autistic people: Systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [39]
The Results (Tolerability measures) report positive feedback from a subset: 28 participants completed a feedback form, and 96% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they enjoyed the group. But this paper does not report a subsequent qualitative study; the Discussion (Limitations and future directions) calls for comprehensive qualitative investigation in future research. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIndividual adaptations were largely viewed positively.
“Individual adaptations were largely viewed positively,39,51”
From Approaches to improving mental healthcare for autistic people: Systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [39]
The Results (Tolerability measures; page not provided) report that 96% of respondents enjoyed the group, and the Discussion says feedback on the adapted group program was positive. The paper describes individual follow-up in the Methods (Intervention program), but does not report whether participants viewed those individual adaptations positively. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTwo of the included articles were from the same trial.
“Two of these articles were from the same trial.34,39”
From Approaches to improving mental healthcare for autistic people: Systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [39]
The Method describes this paper’s pre–post intervention study, but does not identify another article reporting the same trial. Searches for a shared cohort, previously published results, and another trial report found no passage in our copy establishing the relationship between the two cited articles. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 72 · Cited by 59
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [13]White SW Schry AR Kreiser NL Social worries and difficulties: autism and/or social anxiety disorder? Handbook of autism and anxiety 2014 Berlin Springer 121 136
- Authors
- Bemmer, E. R., Boulton, K. A., Thomas, E. E., Larke, B., Lah, S., Hickie, I. B., & Guastella, A. J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Guastella, Adam J.
- Venue
- Molecular Autism
- Published
- 2021-02-08
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-11
- ISSN
- 2040-2392 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7871647
- OpenAlex
- W3128671971
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 4.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Molecular Autism (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council Linkage Grant (LP110200562)
- National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1061922)
- Senior Principal Research Fellowship (1046899)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, social anxiety, social functioning, group cognitive behavioral therapy, social skills training, exposure therapy, behavioural experiments, adolescents and young adults, mood, depression, stress, restricted and repetitive behaviors, social motivation, treatment acceptability, mental health interventions, intervention satisfaction
- MeSH terms
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Social Interaction, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Disease Management, Young Adult, Social Skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review