CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 339Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is social camouflaging associated with anxiety and depression in autistic adults?

Open access
Hull, Laura, Levy, Lily, Lai, Meng-Chuan, Petrides, K. V., Baron-Cohen, Simon, Allison, Carrie, Smith, Paula, Mandy, Will·2021·Molecular Autism
DOI 10.1186/s13229-021-00421-1PMC PMC7885456
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is inconsistent evidence for a clear pattern of association between 'camouflaging' (strategies used to mask and/or compensate for autism characteristics during social interactions) and mental health. METHODS: This study explored the relationship between self-reported camouflaging and generalised anxiety, depression, and social anxiety in a large sample of autistic adults and, for the first time, explored the moderating effect of gender, in an online survey. RESULTS: Overall, camouflaging was associated with greater symptoms of generalised anxiety, depression, and social anxiety, although only to a small extent beyond the contribution of autistic traits and age. Camouflaging more strongly predicted generalised and social anxiety than depression. No interaction between camouflaging and gender was found. LIMITATIONS: These results cannot be generalised to autistic people with intellectual disability, or autistic children and young people. The sample did not include sufficient numbers of non-binary people to run separate analyses; therefore, it is possible that camouflaging impacts mental health differently in this population. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that camouflaging is a risk factor for mental health problems in autistic adults without intellectual disability, regardless of gender. We also identified levels of camouflaging at which risk of mental health problems is highest, suggesting clinicians should be particularly aware of mental health problems in those who score at or above these levels.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13229-021-00421-1

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cusack J, Sterry R. Your questions: shaping future autism research. London: Autistica; 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–339 of 339

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hull, L., Levy, L., Lai, M.-C., Petrides, K. V., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Mandy, W.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Molecular Autism
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-02-16
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
13-13
ISSN
2040-2392 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s13229-021-00421-1
PMC
PMC7885456
OpenAlex
W3132619758
Cited by
337
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 19
FWCI
25.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Molecular Autism (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (RG46450)
  • Wellcome Trust (RG58828)
  • Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (777394)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
social camouflaging, autism spectrum disorder, autistic adults, anxiety, depression, social anxiety, mental health, gender differences, autistic traits, masking, intellectual disability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Autistic Disorder, Depression, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Young Adult, Self Report, Public Health Surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review