Cited by 25Machine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

HybridGCN for protein solubility prediction with adaptive weighting of multiple features

Open access
Chen, Long, Wu, Rining, Zhou, Feixiang, Zhang, Huifeng, Liu, Jian K.·2023·Journal of Cheminformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The solubility of proteins stands as a pivotal factor in the realm of pharmaceutical research and production. Addressing the imperative to enhance production efficiency and curtail experimental costs, the demand arises for computational models adept at accurately predicting solubility based on provided datasets. Prior investigations have leveraged deep learning models and feature engineering techniques to distill features from raw protein sequences for solubility prediction. However, these methodologies have not thoroughly delved into the interdependencies among features or their respective magnitudes of significance. This study introduces HybridGCN, a pioneering Hybrid Graph Convolutional Network that elevates solubility prediction accuracy through the combination of diverse features, encompassing sophisticated deep-learning features and classical biophysical features. An exploration into the intricate interplay between deep-learning features and biophysical features revealed that specific biophysical attributes, notably evolutionary features, complement features extracted by advanced deep-learning models. Augmenting the model’s capability for feature representation, we employed ESM, a substantial protein language model, to derive a zero-shot learning feature capturing comprehensive and pertinent information concerning protein functions and structures. Furthermore, we proposed a novel feature fusion module termed Adaptive Feature Re-weighting (AFR) to integrate multiple features, thereby enabling the fine-tuning of feature importance. Ablation experiments and comparative analyses attest to the efficacy of the HybridGCN approach, culminating in state-of-the-art performances on the public eSOL and S. cerevisiae datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13321-023-00788-8

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Chen, L., Wu, R., Zhou, F., Zhang, H., & Liu, J. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Huifeng
  • Liu, Jian K.
Venue
Journal of Cheminformatics
Published
2023-12-08
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
118-118
ISSN
1758-2946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389486963
Cited by
25
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cheminformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
protein solubility prediction, feature fusion, evolutionary features, feature importance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review