HybridGCN for protein solubility prediction with adaptive weighting of multiple features
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The solubility of proteins stands as a pivotal factor in the realm of pharmaceutical research and production. Addressing the imperative to enhance production efficiency and curtail experimental costs, the demand arises for computational models adept at accurately predicting solubility based on provided datasets. Prior investigations have leveraged deep learning models and feature engineering techniques to distill features from raw protein sequences for solubility prediction. However, these methodologies have not thoroughly delved into the interdependencies among features or their respective magnitudes of significance. This study introduces HybridGCN, a pioneering Hybrid Graph Convolutional Network that elevates solubility prediction accuracy through the combination of diverse features, encompassing sophisticated deep-learning features and classical biophysical features. An exploration into the intricate interplay between deep-learning features and biophysical features revealed that specific biophysical attributes, notably evolutionary features, complement features extracted by advanced deep-learning models. Augmenting the model’s capability for feature representation, we employed ESM, a substantial protein language model, to derive a zero-shot learning feature capturing comprehensive and pertinent information concerning protein functions and structures. Furthermore, we proposed a novel feature fusion module termed Adaptive Feature Re-weighting (AFR) to integrate multiple features, thereby enabling the fine-tuning of feature importance. Ablation experiments and comparative analyses attest to the efficacy of the HybridGCN approach, culminating in state-of-the-art performances on the public eSOL and S. cerevisiae datasets.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Classification: A Comprehensive Review
Rawat, W., & Wang, Z. (2017) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00990 · Cited by 3,503 · see citing works
Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN
Dauparas, J., Anishchenko, I., Bennett, N., Bai, H., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., Wicky, B. I. M., Courbet, A., de Haas, R. J., Bethel, N., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.06.03.494563 · Cited by 2,107 · see citing works
Robust deep learning–based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN
Dauparas, J., Anishchenko, I., Bennett, N., Bai, H., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., Wicky, B. I. M., Courbet, A., de Haas, R. J., Bethel, N., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.add2187 · Cited by 2,070 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models
Naveed, H., Khan, A. U., Qiu, S., Saqib, M., Anwar, S., Usman, M., Akhtar, N., Barnes, N., & Mian, A. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3744746 · Cited by 1,257 · see citing works
Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families
Madani, A., Krause, B., Greene, E. R., Subramanian, S., Mohr, B. P., Holton, J. M., Olmos, J. L., Xiong, C., Sun, Z. Z., Socher, R., et al. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01618-2 · Cited by 1,078 · see citing works
Evaluating Protein Transfer Learning with TAPE
Rao, R., Bhattacharya, N., Thomas, N., Duan, Y., Chen, X., Canny, J., Abbeel, P., & Song, Y. S. (2019) · doi:10.1101/676825 · Cited by 719 · see citing works
Modeling the language of life – Deep Learning Protein Sequences
Heinzinger, M., Elnaggar, A., Wang, Y., Dallago, C., Nechaev, D., Matthes, F., & Rost, B. (2019) · doi:10.1101/614313 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
An empirical analysis of feature engineering for predictive modeling
Heaton, J. (2016) · SoutheastCon 2016 · doi:10.1109/secon.2016.7506650 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Idicula‐Thomas, S., & Balaji, P. V. (2005) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.041009005 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
SOLart: a structure-based method to predict protein solubility and aggregation
Hou, Q., Kwasigroch, J. M., Rooman, M., & Pucci, F. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz773 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Chen, L., Wu, R., Zhou, F., Zhang, H., & Liu, J. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Huifeng
- Liu, Jian K.
- Venue
- Journal of Cheminformatics
- Published
- 2023-12-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 118-118
- ISSN
- 1758-2946 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10704697
- OpenAlex
- W4389486963
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Cheminformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- protein solubility prediction, feature fusion, evolutionary features, feature importance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review