Cited by 3Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and Dynamicsvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Deep learning molecular interaction motifs from receptor structures alone

Open access
Kim, Seeun, Oh, Simaek, Woo, Hyeonuk, Sim, Jiho, Seok, Chaok, Park, Hahnbeom·2025·Journal of Cheminformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Interactions of proteins with other molecules are often mediated by a set of critical binding motifs on their surfaces. Most traditional binder designs relied on motifs borrowed from known binder molecules, which highly restricted their applicability to novel targets or new binding sites. This work presents a deep learning network MotifGen that predicts potential binder motifs directly from receptor structures without further supporting information. MotifGen generates motif profiles at the receptor surface for 14 types of functional groups or 6 chemical interaction classes. These profiles are highly human-interpretable and can be further utilized as pre-trained embedding inputs for versatile few-shot binder design applications. We demonstrate MotifGen's effectiveness through its applications to peptide binder design and small molecule binding site prediction, where it either surpassed existing methods or added significant value when integrated. Our motif-centric approach can offer a new design strategy for novel binder discovery for challenging receptor targets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13321-025-01055-8

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kim, S., Oh, S., Woo, H., Sim, J., Seok, C., & Park, H.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Seok, Chaok
  • Park, Hahnbeom
Venue
Journal of Cheminformatics
Published
2025-07-30
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
113-113
ISSN
1758-2946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412738933
Cited by
3
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cheminformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Korea-US Collaborative Research Fund (RS-2024-00467483)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (RS-2024-00407331, RS-2023-0023215)
  • KIST instututional grant (2E33791)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
protein-ligand interactions, binding site prediction, structure-based drug design, interpretability, pre-trained embeddings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review