Chemical genomics language model toward reliable and explainable compound-protein interaction exploration
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Accurate prediction of compound-protein interactions (CPIs) is crucial for chemical biology and drug discovery. Despite recent advancements, existing deep learning (DL)-based CPI models often struggle to simultaneously achieve high generalization performance, quantify prediction confidence, and ensure explainability. Here, we propose ChemGLaM, a chemical genomics language model designed to address these three crucial challenges, thereby enabling reliable and explainable CPI predictions. ChemGLaM integrates independently pre-trained chemical and protein language models through an interaction block with a cross-attention mechanism, achieving near state-of-the-art performance in predicting novel CPIs at a low computational cost. Incorporating uncertainty estimation and attention visualization enables ChemGLaM to enhance the success rate of virtual screening and to provide molecular insights into CPIs. To demonstrate the practical impact of ChemGLaM, we constructed a publicly available database containing large-scale CPI predictions for every possible pairing between all 20,434 human proteins and all 11,455 drugs and validated its practical applicability in a case study on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. ChemGLaM marks an important step forward in addressing the challenges of AI-driven CPI exploration and drug discovery.Scientific ContributionThis study established a unified CPI prediction framework that simultaneously achieves high generalization performance, confidence quantification, and explainability. We leveraged this framework to create a community resource by constructing a comprehensive CPI database and demonstrated its practical utility by successfully prioritizing hit compounds and deconvoluting their targets in a phenotypic screening for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Large-scale chemical language representations capture molecular structure and properties
Ross, J., Belgodere, B., Chenthamarakshan, V., Padhi, I., Mroueh, Y., & Das, P. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00580-7 · Cited by 590 · see citing works
Mead, R. J., Shan, N., Reiser, H. J., Marshall, F., & Shaw, P. J. (2023) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-022-00612-2 · Cited by 505 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We first performed comprehensive predictions using ChemGLaM for the combined set of 1,607 compounds against 66 previously reported potential ALS therapeutic targets [34].”
Haas, J., Barbato, A., Behringer, D., Studer, G., Roth, S., Bertoni, M., Mostaguir, K., Gumienny, R., & Schwede, T. (2018) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25431 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Koyama, T., Tsumura, H., Okita, R., Yamazaki, K., Hasegawa, A., Imamura, K., Kato, T., Iwata, H., Kojima, R., Inoue, H., Matsumoto, S., & Okuno, Y.
- Affiliations
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Okuno, Yasushi
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Cheminformatics
- Published
- 2026-01-30
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-29
- ISSN
- 1758-2946 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12922394
- OpenAlex
- W7126238826
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 21.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cheminformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP24KJ1510, 22K06112)
- Grant-in-Aid for Transformative Research Areas (A) “Latent Chemical Space” (JP24H01771)
- Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP22bm0804034)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Keywords
- compound-protein interaction prediction, chemical language models, protein language models, cross-attention, uncertainty estimation, attention visualization, explainable AI, virtual screening, drug discovery, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, phenotypic screening, target deconvolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review