Assessing the effect of shape on the evaluation of expected and actual chocolate flavour
Open accessAbstract
Shape can play an important role in our perception of food. In this study, the consequences of crossmodal correspondences between shape and taste on the expected and actual experience of eating chocolate were evaluated. Participants were given two identical dark chocolates differing only in terms of their shape (round or angular) and then rated their expectations of sweetness, bitterness, creaminess and liking. Subsequently, they rated their experience of those attributes on tasting the chocolates. Repeated-measures multivariate analyses (RM-MANOVA) of variance were conducted to assess the role of chocolate shape and cacao content on expected and post-taste chocolate ratings. In addition, we assessed the differences between expected and post-taste ratings for each chocolate shape. The results revealed that the shape of the chocolate significantly influenced expected sweetness, bitterness and creaminess. By contrast, it had no significant effect on post-tasting ratings. The round chocolates were judged to be less sweet, more bitter, less creamy and liked less than expected, whereas the angular chocolates were judged to be slightly more creamy than expected. The theory of assimilation and contrast is outlined as one plausible mechanism behind the differences between expectation and the actual taste experience. Implications for food product design and directions for future research are discussed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Food shape can influence expectations.
“That is, food shape can influence expectations.”
From The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [41]
People expected round-shaped chocolates to taste sweeter and less bitter than angular-shaped chocolates.
“For instance, Wang et al. [41] demonstrated that people expected round-shaped chocolates to taste sweeter and less bitter than angular-shaped chocolates.”
From The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [41]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 57
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Martin A. Revolt over Cadbury's 'rounder, sweeter' bars: Not only has the classic rectangle shape of a Dairy Milk changed, customers say they are more 'sugary' too. Daily Mail. 2013;29:528-41. Downloaded from http:// www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2421568/Revolt-Cadburys-rounder- sweeter-bars-Not-classic-rectangle-shape-Dairy-Milk-changed-customers- also-sugary.html.
- Spence C. Assessing the influence of shape and sound symbolism on the consumer's response to chocolate. New Food. 2014;17(2):59-62.
- Authors
- Wang, Q. J., Reinoso Carvalho, F., Persoone, D., & Spence, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Qian Janice
- Venue
- Flavour
- Published
- 2017-02-08
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2044-7248 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2586224108
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 6.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Flavour (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/L007053/1)
- CAPES Foundation (BEX 3488/13-6)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
- Keywords
- cross-modal correspondence, sweetness, bitterness, creaminess, food product design, dark chocolate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review