Cited by 16Reproductive Health and ContraceptionGlobal Maternal and Child HealthInternational Human Rights and Reproductive Law

Demand for abortion and post abortion care in Ibadan, Nigeria

Open access
Awoyemi, Bosede O, Novignon, Jacob·2014·Health Economics Review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While induced abortion is considered to be illegal and socially unacceptable in Nigeria, it is still practiced by many women in the country. Poor family planning and unsafe abortion practices have daunting effects on maternal health. For instance, Nigeria is on the verge of not meeting the Millennium development goals on maternal health due to high maternal mortality ratio, estimated to be about 630 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. Recent evidences have shown that a major factor in this trend is the high incidence of abortion in the country. The objective of this paper is, therefore, to investigate the factors determining the demand for abortion and post-abortion care in Ibadan city of Nigeria. METHODS: The study employed data from a hospital-based/exploratory survey carried out between March to September 2010. Closed ended questionnaires were administered to a sample of 384 women of reproductive age from three hospitals within the Ibadan metropolis in South West Nigeria. However, only 308 valid responses were received and analysed. A probit model was fitted to determine the socioeconomic factors that influence demand for abortion and post-abortion care. RESULTS: The results showed that 62% of respondents demanded for abortion while 52.3% of those that demanded for abortion received post-abortion care. The findings again showed that income was a significant determinant of abortion and post-abortion care demand. Women with higher income were more likely to demand abortion and post-abortion care. Married women were found to be less likely to demand for abortion and post-abortion care. Older women were significantly less likely to demand for abortion and post-abortion care. Mothers' education was only statistically significant in determining abortion demand but not post-abortion care demand. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that while abortion is illegal in Nigeria, some women in the Ibadan city do abort unwanted pregnancies. The consequence of this in the absence of proper post-abortion care is daunting. There is the need for policymakers to intensify public education against indiscriminate abortion and to reduce unwanted pregnancies. In effect, there is need for effective alternative family planning methods. This is likely to reduce the demand for abortion. Further, with income found as a major constraint, post abortion services should be made accessible to both the rich and poor alike so as to prevent unnecessary maternal deaths as a result of abortion related complications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13561-014-0003-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Bankole A Singh S Haas T Reasons why women have induced abortion: evidence from 27 countries Int Fam Plan Perspec 1998 4 117 127 10.2307/3038208 · DOI
  2. Olukoya P Reducing maternal mortality from unsafe abortion among adolescents in Africa Afr J Reprod Health 2004 4 57 62 10.2307/3583306 15487614 · DOI
  3. Ahman E Shah IH Unsafe abortion: worldwide estimates for 2000 Reprod Health Matter 2002 4 13 17 10.1016/S0968-8080(02)00012-5 12369316 · DOI
  4. Okonofua FE Onwudiegwu U Odutayo R Pregnancy outcome after illegal induced abortion in Nigeria: a retrospective controlled historical study Afr J Med Sci 1994 4 165 169 7625306
  5. Sabatello EF Estimates of demand for abortion among Soviet immigrants in Israel Stud Fam Plann 1992 4 268 273 10.2307/1966888 1412599 · DOI
  6. Mooney T Akinsooto VS Unsafe abortions in a developing country: has liberalization of laws on abortions made a difference? Afr J Reprod Health 2003 4 34 38 10.2307/3583211 14677298 · DOI
  7. Henshaw SK, Singh S, Boniface O-A, Adewole IF, Ngozi I, Yvette PC: The incidence of induced abortion in Nigeria.Int Fam Plan Perspec 1998, 24(4):156–164.
  8. Henshaw SK Singh S Haas T The incidence of abortion worldwide Int Fam Plan Perspec 1999 4 30 38 10.2307/2991869 14627053 · DOI
  9. Agadjanian V: Quasi-legal abortion services in a sub-Saharan settings: user's profile and mortivations.Int Fam Plan Perspec 1998, 24(3):111–116.
  10. Powell-Griner E Trent K Socio-demographic determinants of abortion in the United States Demography 1987 4 553 561 10.2307/2061391 3428454 · DOI
  11. Deyak TA Smith VK The economic value of statute reform: the case of liberalized abortion J Polit Econ 1976 4 83 100 10.1086/260411 · DOI
  12. Medoff MH An economic analysis of the demand for abortion Econ Inq 1988 4 353 359 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1988.tb01499.x 11645607 · DOI
  13. Brown RW Jewell TR The impact of provider availability on abortion demand Contemp Econ Policy 1996 4 95 106 10.1111/j.1465-7287.1996.tb00616.x · DOI
  14. Grossman M Joyce JT Unobservables, pregnancy resolutions and birth weight production functions in New York City J Polit Econ 1990 4 983 1007 10.1086/261716 · DOI
  15. Garbacz C Abortion demand Popul Res Policy Rev 1990 4 151 160 10.1007/BF02343247 · DOI
  16. Kane T Staiger D Teen motherhood and abortion access Q J Econ 1996 4 467 506 10.2307/2946685 · DOI
  17. King RH Myers SC Byrnes DM The demand for abortion by unmarried teenagers: economic factors, age, ethnicity and religiosity matter Am J Econ Sociol 1992 4 223 235 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1992.tb03349.x · DOI
  18. Becker GS The demand for children: a treatise on the family 1981 Harvard University Press, Harvard
  19. Coelen SP McIntyre RJ An econometric model of pronatalist and abortion policies J Polit Econ 1978 4 1077 1102 10.1086/260729 · DOI
  20. Medoff MH The response of the abortion demand to changes in abortion costs Soc Indic Res 2008 4 329 346 10.1007/s11205-007-9176-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Awoyemi, B. O., & Novignon, J.
Affiliations
  • Afe Babalola University (NG)
  • University of Ibadan (NG)
Corresponding author
Awoyemi, Bosede O
Venue
Health Economics Review
Published
2014-06-17
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
3-3
ISSN
2191-1991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122388444
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Economics Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
Keywords
abortion, post-abortion care, socioeconomic factors, income, marital status, maternal health, maternal mortality, unwanted pregnancy, family planning, Ibadan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review