Cited by 34Pharmaceutical Economics and PolicyHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods

Evaluating the administration costs of biologic drugs: development of a cost algorithm

Open access
Tetteh, Ebenezer K, Morris, Stephen·2014·Health Economics Review

Abstract

Biologic drugs, as with all other medical technologies, are subject to a number of regulatory, marketing, reimbursement (financing) and other demand-restricting hurdles applied by healthcare payers. One example is the routine use of cost-effectiveness analyses or health technology assessments to determine which medical technologies offer value-for-money. The manner in which these assessments are conducted suggests that, holding all else equal, the economic value of biologic drugs may be determined by how much is spent on administering these drugs or trade-offs between drug acquisition and administration costs. Yet, on the supply-side, it seems very little attention is given to how manufacturing and formulation choices affect healthcare delivery costs. This paper evaluates variations in the administration costs of biologic drugs, taking care to ensure consistent inclusion of all relevant cost resources. From this, it develops a regression-based algorithm with which manufacturers could possibly predict, during process development, how their manufacturing and formulation choices may impact on the healthcare delivery costs of their products.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13561-014-0026-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The access required for intravenous infusions involves invasive procedures that can be inconvenient and painful and a drain on the time and resources of patients, healthcare professionals, and the healthcare system.

    “The access required for intravenous infusions, the standard administration route for biologic drugs in oncology, involves invasive procedures that can be inconvenient and painful and a drain on the time and resources of patients, healthcare professionals (HCPs), and the healthcare system in general [2–4].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 34

Authors
Tetteh, E. K., & Morris, S.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Tetteh, Ebenezer K
Venue
Health Economics Review
Published
2014-10-23
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
26-26
ISSN
2191-1991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101831231
Cited by
34
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Economics Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • School of Pharmacy, University College London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Keywords
biologic drugs, administrative costs, pharmaceutical manufacturing, drug formulation, cost-effectiveness analysis, health technology assessment, value for money, cost prediction, process development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review