Cited by 23Herpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsChemokine receptors and signalingAnimal Virus Infections Studies

CCL2 and CCL5 driven attraction of CD172a+ monocytic cells during an equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1) infection in equine nasal mucosa and the impact of two migration inhibitors, rosiglitazone (RSG) and quinacrine (QC).

Open access
Zhao, Jing, Poelaert, Katrien C. K., Van Cleemput, Jolien, Nauwynck, Hans J.·2017·Veterinary Research

Abstract

Equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1) causes respiratory disease, abortion and neurological disorders in horses. Besides epithelial cells, CD172a + monocytic cells become infected with EHV-1 in the respiratory mucosa and transport the virus from the apical side of the epithelium to the lamina propria en route to the lymph and blood circulation. Whether CD172a + monocytic cells are specifically recruited to the infection sites in order to pick up virus is unknown. In our study, equine nasal mucosa explants were inoculated with EHV-1 neurological strains 03P37 and 95P105 or the non-neurological strains 97P70 and 94P247 and the migration of monocytic cells was examined by immunofluorescence. Further, the role of monokines CCL2 and CCL5 was determined and the effect of migration inhibitors rosiglitazone (RSG) or quinacrine was analyzed. It was shown that with neurological strains but not with the non-neurological strains, CD172a + cells specifically migrated towards EHV-1 infected regions and that CCL2 and CCL5 were involved. CCL2 started to be expressed in infected epithelial cells at 24 h post-incubation (hpi) and CCL5 at 48 hpi, which corresponded with the CD172a + migration. RSG treatment of EHV-1-inoculated equine nasal mucosa had no effect on the virus replication in the epithelium, but decreased the migration of CD172a + cells in the lamina propria. Overall, these findings bring new insights in the early pathogenesis of EHV-1 infections, illustrate differences between neurological and non-neurological strains and show the way for EHV-1 treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13567-017-0419-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In nasal mucosal explants, EHV-1 elicited the production of chemokines CCL2 and CCL5 already at 24 hours post-inoculation in order to attract target CD172a+ cells.

    “In nasal mucosal explants, EHV-1 elicited the production of chemokines (e.g., CCL2 and CCL5), already at 24 hpi, in order to attract target CD172a+ cells (Gryspeerdt et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2017).”

    From The Pathogenesis and Immune Evasive Mechanisms of Equine Herpesvirus Type 1 (2021) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2017

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says CCL2 and CCL5 were first detected at 24 hpi and were involved in attracting CD172a+ cells. However, the Results and Discussion limit the increased chemokine production and cell migration to neurological EHV-1 strains; non-neurological strains did not show a significant increase. The Results also report a significant CCL5 increase only from 48 hpi. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 23

Authors
Zhao, J., Poelaert, K. C. K., Van Cleemput, J., & Nauwynck, H. J.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Nauwynck, Hans J.
Venue
Veterinary Research
Published
2017-02-27
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
14-14
ISSN
  • 0928-4249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1297-9716
OpenAlex
W2590648030
Cited by
23
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Veterinary Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • China Scholarship Council (201203250001)
  • Institute for the promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT-Vlaanderen) (141627)
  • Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) (11Y5415N)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
Keywords
equine herpesvirus 1, MCP-1, RANTES, chemokines, cell migration, rosiglitazone, quinacrine, nasal mucosa, viral pathogenesis, horses, lamina propria
MeSH terms
Rosiglitazone, Animals, Cell Movement, Herpesvirus 1, Equid, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Herpesviridae Infections, Horse Diseases, Horses, Monocytes, Nasal Mucosa, Quinacrine, Receptors, Immunologic, Chemokine CCL2, Chemokine CCL5, Thiazolidinediones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review